Writing on X, the Republican politician said she was creating legislation that would make "the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity" a felony.

…

"I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity," she wrote. "It will be a felony offense."

She added: "We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering."

top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

It's like utterly humorless Art Bell fans took over the government.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    So if I pray to God, and ask him to send a hurricane to Mar-a-Lago, and he actually does, that's allowed?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    So weather manipulation as a byproduct is okay?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Depending on how climate change turns out for some regions, they will definitely come back to the topic of weather engineering. No rain for a year or two will do this for you.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    starting with CO2, right Marje??

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Jesus Christ 🤦‍♂️

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago
    [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    So like climate change, right?... Right?

  • source
  • [–] 114 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    What an absolute fucking idiot.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    She will get reelected by the citizens of northeast Georgia because they vote.

    Do you?

    (More of a comment to the average reader, not an attack on OP)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    She'll be re-elected because her district is very white, very rural, and very disinformed by sources like Fox News, Newsmax, and conservative AM talk radio. On the rare occasions that the democrats bother to run someone in her district they tend to get less than 30% of the vote. And, if there were ever a danger that the seat might be close, the borders would be adjusted to ensure it stays safely Republican.

    The problem goes much deeper than voting or not voting.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If this unintentionally regulates greenhouse gas emissions I’m going to laugh so hard.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 161 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity,”

    So carbon dioxide? Guess we better shut down the coal power plants. MTG says so!

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Alas "express purpose" is in there. Clearly the express purpose for petrol companies is profit. And CO2, other pollutants are just inadvertent things that happened on the way to (destroying the planet for) profit. I mean they only sold the petrol products, they didn't force people that purchased the gasoline to burn it. Maybe we can go after the combustion engine producers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    So one could say they hobby at creating potassium iodide, but its expensive to pay to dispose of, so I dump it out of the back of an aircraft that was hired. There was no intention of actually seeding the clouds and making it rain, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity,

    I'm sure I've seen MTG breathing on her hands in cold weather, which falls into the above perfectly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is performative ignorance, to please the home schooled bible toting cretins who vote.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 74 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    So would preventing “geoengineering” also prevent trying to stop climate change?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I honestly can't tell whether her intent is to block any counter-climate change projects or if this is just a dumb chemtrails thing.

    I mean, I assume it's chemtrails, given the source, but it could easily be a "I like the smell of forest fires, and you'll reduce hurricane intensity over my dead body." Given the source.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Misting fans are now a felony

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    All the fucking stupidest people. Every goddamn idiotic conspiracy theory is getting a pipeline straight to mainstream news outlets and a rep in government now. Instead of some stupid Bircher literature or having to stand out on the street and screech nonsense at passerby who could just ignore the crazy people...

    I am seriously wondering when the moon landing denialists and the flat earth morons and the HIV-denialists will get their day of representation, too.

    We already have the anti-vaxxer dumbfucks, the Qanon loons, the evolution-denying dipshits, what else is missing...? How about David Icke level bullshit about lizard people?

    JFC.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I am seriously wondering when the moon landing denialists and the flat earth morons and the HIV-denialists will get their day of representation, too.

    What is it about this current admin, and the secretary of HHS that makes you think that today isn't already that day?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So go after the bullshit corpos releasing megatons of co2 into the atmosphere

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    So, she wants to ban "cloud seeding"?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    It's that psudo-science anyway? And I think only done in the rich parts of the middle east.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    It's not pseudo-science. The science behind it is solid. But, weather is very chaotic. It's known to work to a certain extent, but it has relatively minor effects, it's very unpredictable, has unpredictable side effects, and is fairly expensive. All you're really doing is slightly boosting the formation of ice crystals in the clouds by adding a material that will hopefully produce more nucleation sites. It works in a lab, but how well it works up in the atmosphere is unknown. It probably does something, but it's very hard to get an estimate of your "bang for the buck".

    For example, Beijing tried it during the 2008 Olympics to reduce the chances of rain during the Olympic opening and closing ceremonies. There was a moderate chance of rain predicted to happen during the opening ceremony. The government launched more than 1000 rain dispersal rockets, and it didn't rain during the opening ceremony. Did the rockets disperse the rain? Or did it simply not rain because that's not how the clouds developed. Who can say?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    These aren't serious people.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I mean, technically we’ve been playing around with cloud seeding and such which is about the only thing I can think of that would even come close to what she is talking about. But it’s by no means a common occurrence.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Why is mtg still able to talk?

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Marjorie Taylor Green is such a waste of resources.

    Ugly, dumb and vile.

    And I bet she stinks.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Maybe they'll unintentionally outlaw pollution like when the Republicans accidentally legalized cannabis in 2018

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Sadly, all it will take is some CEO to publicly state "I didn't intend to pollute the environment. I dumped dangerous chemicals into nature because I wanted more money. Yes, I knew my actions would modify the weather, as this legislation states. But that was not my express purpose. My purpose was to be able to afford my 17th yacht so my peers would accept me."

    Perfectly legal.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Does this make "Rollin' coal" illegal?

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I thought she'd prioritize dealing with sharknado attacks but there we have it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I'll rotfl my mao off when this law will turn out to accidentally punish fossil fuel and chemical companies dispersing chemicals or substances into the atmosphere and altering weather, also known as climate change.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You just know they won't touch those companies because how else are they gonna get their bribe money?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    I bet some megaMAGAmorons will embark on a quest to prove their nonsense right... and in the end find out it was the same companies that polluted the air, water and soil whos CEOs are buddybuddy with their beloved leader...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Laws aren't auto-enforcing magic. Any time that fossil fuel companies violate this stupid law (written for purely performative reasons) it simply wouldn't be enforced.

    Similarly, if the law allows for civil action, a multitude of reasons would be conjured on demand explaining why the lawsuit couldn't move forward against fossil fuel companies. If it managed to move through district courts, it would simply wind up on the supreme court docket and they would again conjure up some reasons why the suit was invalid.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    I can see how people in the future could turn this one around on to oil and plastic companies. We should probably not stop this one.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    She's attempting to ban Geoengineering. From Wikipedia:

    Geoengineering (also known as climate engineering or climate intervention) is the deliberate large-scale interventions in the Earth’s climate system intended to counteract human-caused climate change.[1] The term commonly encompasses two broad categories: large-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR) and solar radiation modification (SRM). CDR involves techniques to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and is generally considered a form of climate change mitigation. SRM aims to reduce global warming by reflecting a small portion of sunlight (solar radiation) away from Earth and back into space. Although historically grouped together, these approaches differ substantially in mechanisms, timelines, and risk profiles, and are now typically discussed separately.[2]: 168 [3] Some other large-scale engineering proposals—such as interventions to slow the melting of polar and alpine ice—are also sometimes classified as forms of geoengineering.

    Some types of geoengineering present political, social and ethical issues. One common objection is that focusing on these technologies could undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Effective governance and international oversight are widely regarded as essential.

    Major scientific organizations have examined the potential, risks, and governance needs of geoengineering, including the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine,[4][5][6] the Royal Society,[7] the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),[8] and the World Climate Research Programme.[1]

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    This is awesome. Do it. What’s gonna happen when the contrails don’t disappear? Who are they gonna arrest? Gonna have to stock up on popcorn because the theatre of the ignorant is about to get really interesting. Finally a piece of legislation I can get excited about.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    This is a bill to arrest people trying to prevent climate change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    While geoengineering isn't really something that has been tried yet, it's actual purpose if done would be to address climate change. Albiet, not really prevention but more in a canceling out some of the symptoms sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Geoengineering is a field dedicated to exactly that - mitigating climate change by modifying solar input and so forth.

    Basically, the Republicans have been shooting the environment and now want to ban tourniquets and sutures.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    All this is gonna stop is cloud seeding, since that is literally the only way in which we manipulate the weather.

    Well... On purpose, I mean. If this has the side effect of outlawing all greenhouse emissions because it's altering the weather in form of making shit hotter, that's a win.

    Edit: Also I am reminded of the time some PR lady for HAARP said the array can manipulate the weather because, technically, it could punch a hole in clouds directly above it. Which I thought was just stupid, even as a joke, because they were trying to squash the rumors that it was some kind of hurricane machine.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • What's the worst that can happen, farmers face droughts and companies can't allow relief due to legality so the crops just die and we have food shortages? I mean that just hurts the farmers and the non-rich... So no fucks they will give

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    I haven’t read the article or comments yet. Just the post title. I am afraid of the amount of brain cells I am about to lose. I’m going in, will update in a moment.

    Edit: what the fuck did I just read. A new bill to stop a conspiracy theory? MTG is dumb as a stone and I can’t comprehend how she is still in office

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Could the bill be used to base measures on that help combat climate change? Sometimes idiots are actually useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    Could it? Possibly. Would it? Probably not. At least not with big daddi T/ republicans in office. They deny the effects of pollutants in the atmosphere so there is no weather modification taking place (according to them). Considering that trump is taking away tax credits for solar and wind and is increasing leasing and tax credits for oil, gas, and coal industries I don’t think this bill will provide much benefit for the climate

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Stop paying attention to her. Make sure the next thing you click on related to her, is footage of her murder.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    So glad we handed over all levers of power to these morons.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Oh for fucks sake…. How can one woman be some incredibly dense?

    She probably heard somewhere that is why there were flash floods in Texas because some evil genius is punishing “real Americans”.

    The ironic thing is the GOP constant bashing of clean, renewable energy and promoting fossil fuels and coal really is affecting the weather, just not in a very predictable or controlled way.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I mean who else wants to hurt God loving Texans other than the radical left? No one that's who. The radical left is lying to you about climate change so they can hide their secret Jewish space lasers and punish anyone on the right for speaking out. Like, if you're on the right you're not even allowed to speak anymore, at all, about anything. It's always the left agenda this, or left agenda that, bo one listens to the right anymore. The radical left terrorists have bullied the right with fake climate change so now when there's a national disaster the left can come out with their conspiracy theories about climate change when we really know what they're doing. The left terrorists hate America and want to destroy it by making more natural disasters, and making them more serious then lie to your face and call it climate change when it's really them who are causing natural disasters to change in our climate to silence the right.

    Hopefully obvious that is parody

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Are they literally just laying the groundwork to frame Democrats for weather modifications so they can blame all of climate change on us and create a modern day witch hunt? Seriously? How the fuck is anyone stupid enough to believe this shit?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    How the fuck is anyone stupid enough to believe this shit?

    The American "education" system... that's how. Conservatives paid good money over the decades to build this level of general stupidity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    anything but the real issue

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    These people are dumb as rocks. There are also similar elements in GA like Kandiss Taylor(stupid name) beginning their political careers also proclaiming that Climate Change is fake but also suggesting that unprecedented weather conditions must be the work of external forces presumably also blaming the jews.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Seriously fuck this idiot and the idiots who voted for her. Just a disgraceful embarrassment. Then again so is work, so I get it, but have some dignity.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Does it include the pollutants coming from her private jet ?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Geoengineering… like fracking?

    Or like building man-made lakes and tunnels? What about digging a pool in my backyard?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Wonder if this could be used against fossil fuel or chemical companies. The only words that would need to be dropped is "express purpose"

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I will fuckin love if she fucks around and discovers climate change

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    At this point she is trolling with legislation, this is not even legislation for financial profit, she is just doing it to fuck with the minds of people that support green energy transition against climate change. Pure malicious glee. I hope she faces mob justice at this point.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›