How about saying "Mexico's Gulf" to get around this stupid law?
I mean, we're not talking about this guy being an organized crime boss. This guy isn't a capo which puts enormous pressure on anything touched.
You can say that, but it sounds like he tried to pull some strings.
People close to Mulivanov say he has type 2 diabetes and polyneuropathy, and that his health deteriorated in pretrial detention.
I don't think he'll have to worry about diabetes or neuropathy for much longer. I foresee far more health deterioration when he faces a Ukrainian FPV drone on the front lines.
I don't know. Here's a couple of the very clear examples if you want to search for yourself:
ER:
Season 1 Episode 15 ("Feb. 5, '95"): Dr. Mark Greene treats a terminally ill cancer patient named Grace (or a breast cancer/lymph node cancer patient) who asks him to help her die. Mark increases her morphine dose to relieve her severe pain, which results in her death, sparking an ethical debate among viewers and staff about end-of-life care and palliative dosing.
The Pitt:
Episode 11 ("5:00 P.M.") of The Pitt, (dying terminal cancer patient, Roxie) Dr. Cassie McKay and Dr. Robby increase her morphine dose (invoking the doctrine of double effect, where the primary goal is pain relief even if it risks suppressing respiration) and Roxie passes away while the team deals with other emergency room crises.
ER:
The storyline occurs in Season 1, Episode 20, titled "Full Moon, Saturday Night" (originally aired in April 1995).
In this episode, the ER is chaotic due to a full moon. The nurse Haleh Adams informs Dr. Susan Lewis that a newborn baby was found abandoned inside a trash bag.
The Pitt:
The Pitt spans Season 2, starting with Season 2, Episode 5 (titled "BABY JANE DOE!") Baby Jane Doe is an infant found abandoned in the hospital's waiting room bathroom at 7:30 a.m..
This doesn't surprise me. We watched The Pitt and loved it. We'd heard the about the lawsuit and thought how empty it must be to just be a similar show about doctors in the Emergency Room.
Wanting more we went back and started rewatching ER (which holds up surprisingly well!). Episode after episode of ER we're recognizing nearly exact patient plot points in Season 1 in ER that were depicted in The Pitt. Each time we see one in ER, we're understanding the lawsuit more. It almost feels like the writers of The Pitt watched ER season 1 for its plot points.
I don't know who Van Hollen is, yet I support Van Hollen for majority leader too.
The Judge did indicate that he didn’t believe Lum was likely to commit another crime,
Why does the judge think the defendant changed his tune?-
I'm not going to argue with you on the why to ban the death penalty. We both agree it should be banned. Honestly the reasons we arrive at the same answer are immaterial.
I find it interesting that I start with my post about saying I support the banning the death penalty, and I close with the post with my support for banning the death penalty. Yet multiple people are clipping out both of those agreements to focus on the an intermediate disagreement.
We arrive at the same conclusion to ban the death penalty, but you don't like the first reason why I want it banned. Why fight a battle that is already won?
Didn’t read beyond that, it’s unlikely you have anything valuable to say.
Wow. Its not often someone tells on themselves so clearly, but I appreciate that you did. I know exactly how much concern to give your posts now and in the future!
If you are not opposed to the death penalty
Did you miss the part where I said "ban the death penalty"?