US drama The Pitt is similar enough to medical series ER for a lawsuit against its producers to progress, a court in the US has ruled.

The widow of Michael Crichton, who created ER, argues The Pitt is effectively a reboot of the series, which has been made without proper permission or credit.

Sherri Crichton says her husband's contract included a "frozen rights" provision that prohibited any spin-offs, sequels or reboots of ER being made without his express consent.

A three-judge panel said there are "clear and numerous similarities between The Pitt and ER," which means the case can go ahead. Warner Bros previously described the lawsuit as "baseless" and sought to have it dismissed.

Listing the similarities between the two shows, the court cited the emergency room setting, the fast pace, use of medical jargon, graphic depictions of injuries, and younger doctors fresh from medical school being trained.

"We find the details here suffice for a prima facie case," the judges said.

It means the case will now go to a jury trial in Los Angeles Superior Court.

all 91 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 161 points 1 day ago (24 children)

Good to know we'll never have any new TV shows based in an emergency room ever again

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 day ago* (13 children)

    This bullshit! How judges going rule this is a reboot. Fuck the judge with cactus. Now this great show will get canceled. But come on better cancel or pay out for every single hospital show. Fucking cunt just like her asshole husband. Hope they fight this and bury her in court fees.

    Edit: wife called it exact comparison Grey's Anatomy would fit all the same criteria. Why didn't the bitch sue creator of that show?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

    It's because the showrunners of The Pitt worked on E.R and were in talks with Crichton's widow to make a sequel, but the network didn't want to pay the royalties she was asking for. So they pivoted to making an original medical drama that was very similar to E.R, hence her suing them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    Which will easily get defeated when they can point to something like Grey's and the lack of legal action.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Is Grey’s based in an emergency room setting? Does it share key actors and staff? What about Scrubs? House?

    Is it pure coincidence that a bunch of ER alumni happen to create a completely unrelated show that happens to feature the comings and goinga of doctors in an emergency room?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago

    Valid points that the Pitt should just lean into. "We wanted to do a sequel. We couldn't come to terms. We dropped any ER (the show) based stuff and kept all the ER medical stuff."

    Does 24 have standing to sue because they did the 1 hour per show format?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago*

    I would argue that just because you wanted to do a reboot and then couldn't do reboot and did something else instead isn't really evidence in and of itself.

    Star Wars was of course supposed to be a flash Gordon reboot but no one seems to care about that.

    If I pitch a cop drama that doesn't get made does that prohibit me as a producer from ever having anything to do with cop dramas ever again? I have to stick to musicals for the rest of my life and hope that one of those never gets denied.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    “We find the details here suffice for a prima facie case,” the judges said.

    Pretty early there to say it will get "easily" defeated, when the judges have found that there is a credible claim

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Nothing of the sort was ruled. There hasn’t been any substantial proceedings at all. The only thing that has been decided is that there is enough of a plausible claim to proceed with a case.

    Perhaps there is nothing there but an ER-based medical drama featuring a common actor and some common show runners and staff. Perhaps discovery will uncover some damning evidence of (surprise) TV evecs being shitty people and trying to screw over creators of an IP.

    Time will tell

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Legal Eagle has video on it from a couple months ago.

    tl;dr the most damning evidence to the layman is they actually approached the estate about a reboot/spinoff that fell through before all of a sudden the Pitt happened

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago* (1 child)

    Yeah but if that's the entirety of their evidence they're going to have to really hope that they've got something in Discovery. Because I can totally envision and utterly innocent series of events that would also result in The Pitt coming about.

    1. Old producers of ER are looking for some work so they approach about doing a reboot.
    2. Talks begin but ultimately fall through and the show never gets created.
    3. The producers are there for still looking for a new show to do so start to come up with their own IP.
    4. Given that they have history in the medical industry it makes sense to make another show based in the medical industry. It's not like there going to do a period piece or anything.
    5. They write an original IP story based in the medical industry.
    6. They pitched it, and it gets produced. One of the benefits being that it is original IP, and they don't have to give any credit to anyone and therefore the show is cheaper to produce.

    A logical series of events that lead to a similar show being produced after engaging with talks to produce a reboot of the show ER, but all totally innocent and not evidence of IP theft.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • No the judge is being reasonable while you are being OTT. As others have said, there were talks to make a reboot/sequel to ER which fell through and ER was directly adapted from a Michael Crichton script. The key is the same producers went on anyway to make a show that even used a same principle actor because they allegedly didn't want to pay for the rights.

    The judge has only ruled that there is a case to hear on face value. It may well be that once the facts are heard, the producers and Warner Brothers win. It may well be that the producers lose and are felt to have effectively made the same show anyway, and owe the estate money.

    It's important to remember that ER is directly based on a script written by Michael Crichton who was a medical student in an emergency room prior to being a writer. Steven Spielberg took the script and developed it with John Wells and the pilot for ER is pretty much that script, barely changed. It's not some tenuous connection - it is effectively Michael Crichton's show as much as the other original producers, no matter how much it changed over 15 seasons.

    This is not about making shows based in Emergency Rooms. This purely about whether this show is actually a sequel to ER that has been changed a little to get away from paying one of the original producers estates. If it had not been the exact same producers who were discussing making a sequel to ER, then there likely wouldn't have been a case.

    The Pitt's executive producers include: John Wells, an executive producer on ER, R Scott Gemmil a writer & producer on ER and Noah Wyle an actor on ER. At face value that is quite the coincidence, especially when they also pitched a reboot of ER.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    They could have chosen not to cast Noah Wyle. I legit thought it was a sequel to ER.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    That's kinda like saying Michael Imperioli couldn't take a role as a mob boss because he played Christopher Moltisanti and that would make it a Sopranos spin-off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Sure. Just providing an outside perspective. I haven't watched either show, and that's the connection I made.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Right, but Allison Janney and Bradley Whitford were both in The West Wing. Now they're both in The Diplomat playing characters in the White House. But that doesn't make the Diplomat a sequel to the West Wing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

    It would make me think so at first. Like, I wondered if Rob Lowe was going to get involved when I read that Janney and whitford were doing a political drama together.

    It’s not enough to win the case, but I absolutely agree that there’s enough there to bring the case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Listing the similarities between the two shows, the court cited the emergency room setting, the fast pace, use of medical jargon, graphic depictions of injuries, and younger doctors fresh from medical school being trained.

    I hope she isn't going after Scrubs next they also meet all these standards too!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 1 day ago (1 child)
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago

    Gray's wasn't/isn't solely based in the ER, a lot in the OR and patient rooms. There are also numerous other medical dramas before and since that haven't been sued.

    As someone who never saw ER i wonder if these broad descriptions are enough for the claim to succeed with a jury. A key point is probably going to be that Noah Wyle was in ER and in talks for a sequel that the estate shutdown before The Pitt.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 68 points 1 day ago (6 children)

    You ever been so out of the loop that this article is where you found out that Michael Crichton died?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I'll see your 'found out via article' and raise you a 'found out in a comment on said article'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Listing the similarities between the two shows, the court cited the emergency room setting, the fast pace, the use of medical jargon, graphic depictions of injuries and younger doctors fresh from medical school being trained.

    With the exception (maybe) of the younger training doctors, though I imagine doctors gotta learn, everything described there is a definitional part of a medical drama set in an emergency room. I understand the court letting this move forward because there may be good reason to explore the more detailed similarities. But the ones they listed there... that is baseless.

    You cannot copyright a real world setting or genre. The subject matter of emergency room medicine is not owned by Michael Crichton, Warner Brothers, or anyone. Would be like saying the creator of Honeymooners owns the rights to domestic abuse. ER's copyright encompasses its characters, and specific stories. Not the entire concept of an ER or triage medicine. It did not create any of those concepts. It also doesn't own the style of narrative, pacing, editing, cinematography, etc. used, either.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago

    With the exception (maybe) of the younger training doctors, though I imagine doctors gotta learn, everything described there is a definitional part of a medical drama set in an emergency room.

    And the training doctors are an audience insert, so that characters can explain shit that would be obvious for anyone who is actually at home in the setting.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 20 hours ago

    It's also shot in a totally different way that is obvious, even to people who don't understand tv production. If there had been no mention of ER, NOBODY would make the connection.

    It sounds like they had this medical show with Noah Wylie, and someone had the bright idea of shortcutting the promotion by tying to a beloved old show he'd been in. There was really no connection, but if it could make the show get accepted faster, it would be worth it. So they float the idea, but move forward anyway, because the project doesn't rely on the ER connection.

    Later, the Estate claims the ER connection was everything because of course they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Somehow I got The Pitt mixed up with The Bear and did grueling mental gymnastics for too long trying to figure out how any of this is possible.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Oh no, not medical jargon and depictions of injuries in a medical show. It must be copyright infringement there's no other explanation for it.

    They should probably sue Scrubs next.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Doesn't sound like it's about copyright infringement, just contract law.

    The studio negotiated at first but then just went ahead without receiving authorization for a reboot from the estate holding that veto right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 day ago

    This is the start of a dangerous precedent that may allow a circus to sue the court for copyright infringement on the grounds that it's full of clowns.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    So does that mean ER could be found too similar to Scrubs or Gray's Anatomy? 🤔

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    I always forget that Crichton created ER. He was so prolific.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)
  • [–] 22 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    I can name 10 shows matching those criteria...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    It's a standard medical show, that focuses on the ER, like a million other shows. The only connection is Noah Wylie, so he's now prohibited from doing a medical show because it will be considered a spin-off of a show he did decades ago? As a juror, I would find that to be stupid.

    Isn't Michael Chriton's widow wealthy enough?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 5 hours ago

    The shitshow these judges just opened up is hilarious.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 day ago

    All I'm hearing is "They used the same actor! And it's more medically accurate!" which is about where the similarities end.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Next up Crichton's widow will be sued by the creators of E/R

    Even had Clooney (and Mary McDonnell who played Carter's mom in ER)

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Having not watched ER, is there anything that makes it unique? As far as I can tell, it's a show about an ER.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    TiL Michael Crichton wrote ER.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 20 hours ago
    [–] 14 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    No they aren’t. These two shows are about as close as Gilligan’s Island and Lost. Both shows are about a group of people lost an island but that’s about it. Same here.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago* (3 children)

    This doesn't surprise me. We watched The Pitt and loved it. We'd heard the about the lawsuit and thought how empty it must be to just be a similar show about doctors in the Emergency Room.

    Wanting more we went back and started rewatching ER (which holds up surprisingly well!). Episode after episode of ER we're recognizing nearly exact patient plot points in Season 1 in ER that were depicted in The Pitt. Each time we see one in ER, we're understanding the lawsuit more. It almost feels like the writers of The Pitt watched ER season 1 for its plot points.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    How many of those plots have been done in other medical shows?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    I don't know. Here's a couple of the very clear examples if you want to search for yourself:

    ER:
    Season 1 Episode 15 ("Feb. 5, '95"): Dr. Mark Greene treats a terminally ill cancer patient named Grace (or a breast cancer/lymph node cancer patient) who asks him to help her die. Mark increases her morphine dose to relieve her severe pain, which results in her death, sparking an ethical debate among viewers and staff about end-of-life care and palliative dosing.

    The Pitt:
    Episode 11 ("5:00 P.M.") of The Pitt, (dying terminal cancer patient, Roxie) Dr. Cassie McKay and Dr. Robby increase her morphine dose (invoking the doctrine of double effect, where the primary goal is pain relief even if it risks suppressing respiration) and Roxie passes away while the team deals with other emergency room crises.


    ER:
    The storyline occurs in Season 1, Episode 20, titled "Full Moon, Saturday Night" (originally aired in April 1995). In this episode, the ER is chaotic due to a full moon. The nurse Haleh Adams informs Dr. Susan Lewis that a newborn baby was found abandoned inside a trash bag.

    The Pitt:
    The Pitt spans Season 2, starting with Season 2, Episode 5 (titled "BABY JANE DOE!") Baby Jane Doe is an infant found abandoned in the hospital's waiting room bathroom at 7:30 a.m..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    I’m just restarting scrubs with the wife who hadn’t seen it and, already in Season 1 I’ve seen bowel disimpacting and needle draining a stomach with the same comedic spurt effect. I did not jump to the conclusion Pitt copied Scrubs, I assumed this was a universal type experience for med interns akin to other newbie tropes in other profession shows.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Wait, the Librarian is also a doctor?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 20 hours ago* (1 child)

    Dude if you haven't seen The Pitt yet, do yourself a favor and watch it ASAP.

    It's some of the best TV currently on. It's early to say, but I've seen some go as far to potentially put it up there with the likes of The Sopranos and The Wire.

    Personally, I'll give it another season or two before making a claim like that. But the show is outstanding imo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    well duh because the showrunner/lead is in the original ER drama.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 hours ago* (1 child)

    All these comments, all you ignorant sluts, you're missing the silver lining. If this lawsuit is allowed to go through there's a chance that the 10 million procedural cop dramas that are on the air every goddamn second will all eat each other alive. We could have a paradise. They could all destroy each other. And we would be free. Hell throw in anything that has to do with Emergency Services, same fucking show.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    Can we get reality shows to eat themselves too? I mean aren't they all the same?

    Speaking of which, someone got me to try and watch the new Wonka game show. Couldn't do it. 2 seconds of action, followed by 2 minutes of each person sitting in a chair saying shit I don't care about. How do people watch this crap?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 21 hours ago

    Youd have to be the Marvin Gaye estate to think that the pitt is plagiarising er.....

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 20 hours ago*

    The Pitt was supposed to be a sequel and the bearded guy was supposed to play doctor Carter again but they didn't get the rights so they changed his name.

    So yes, it was thought of as a reboot but it's not actually a reboot. This lawsuit is idiotic.

    (also, The Pitt sux)

  • source
  • 13 comments in c/television@piefed.social view that post