top 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago*

If we are in a black hole, then the thing you feared most about falling into a black hole must be bullshit since we are quite fine. Relative to the vastness of shit in the universe, anyway.

  • source
  • [–] 325 points 1 year ago (62 children)

    I took a physics course at a community college over 20 years ago and one of the things that stood out to me was the professor telling us not to overthink or assign too much romanticism to the idea of black holes.

    His message was basically “it just means the escape velocity is greater than the speed of light… if you plug the size and mass of the universe into the escape velocity formula, the result you get back is greater than the speed of light, so our entire universe is a black hole.”

    If this was being discussed at a community college decades ago then I think the new discoveries aren’t as revelatory as they would at first appear to the general public.

  • source
  • hideshow 62 child comments
  • [–] 110 points 1 year ago (40 children)

    Nah really it was probably some small thing the media got a hold of and just ran with. I think you're spot on

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 40 child comments
  • [–] 113 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Smbc is Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal, but what does xkcd stand for?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (31 children)

    On the contrary; while I have heard the explanation that the commenter you replied to has said I have also heard a slightly different theory:

    Our universe is the 3 dimensional event horizon of a 4th dimensional black hole. By extension we may find that black holes in our universe have similar funky 2 dimensional areas at their even horizons.

    I am sure clickbait articles are part of it but there also seems to be several actual theories surrounding the idea of the nature of our universe relating to black holes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (30 children)
  • [+] 26 points 1 year ago (19 children)
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    YOU can't move freely in time. Don't speak for me.

    Ok, I can't either. But still...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I think I can move freely in time, just not voluntarily...

    Sometimes I go through a whole day in like a minute, sometimes I blink and it's Monday already.

    Or maybe it's working nights has that effect?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    You move through time every second...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Walk in the other direction then, let's see how that goes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    That not how you do it. Watch a documentary called edge of all we know. Someone much smarter then you has that opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Sure you know more then the wheel chair guy gj

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Snark and fact are 2 different things. Sorry you disagree with the wheel man and I don't. Enjoy your earth centric view of the universe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Sure u know more then the wheel chair man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    So much just to say your not wrong so if he said 11 d then your 3d model is wrong by your own definition. Please read before you write

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Nah, this universe is 3d.

    I'm assuming you are thinking that time is the 4th dimension and we have time here so we are 4d?

    Time may be the 4th dimension, but in our universe, time doesn't actually behave like a proper dimension. For one thing, dimensions should be spatially perpendicular to each other and time is not. We also seem to only be able to move one way through time whereas we can move back and forth through the other 3 dimensions.

    Dimensions get weird and complicated. For the intents and purposes of this conversation it's correct to say that the universe were experiencing now is 3 dimensional.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's actually a crazy take that time isn't a dimension. We'll if someone say the sky is purple who am I to argue?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Three spacial dimensions, which is normally what people mean when they say that, unless they specify otherwise. For example, we call them 3D game engines, not 4D. Yes, there's also a time dimension that is special. It cannot be moved through freely.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Yes, but if you're beyond the event horizon of a black hole time becomes basically* irrelevant. You could literally turn around, look back out towards the rest of he universe, and watch all of time play out in the blink of an eye.

    You know that scene in Interstellar where they land on the planet for 5 minutes, but 20 years passes for everyone else due to the planet's mass? It's the same thing, but a billion-billion-billion times more severe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    No, time does not become irrelevant. It's perfectly normal for things inside the black hole. Here's the space time diagram for our universe on the right, and a black hole at the top-left. Time is the vertical axis, space is the horizontal. The speed of light is a 45° angle, and the solid lines are event horizons. The hourglass shapes are the cones of all your possible futures and pasts (aka, anywhere that isn't faster than the speed of light from a position). Notice the space-time diagram looks exactly the same on the other side of the horizon. To get back through though you'd have to travel faster than that 45° angle, which is impossible.

    Edit: I remembered there's a PBS Space Time video that will help you understand this if you don't. It goes a lot further than just this version of the diagram.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I'm aware of the Penrose diagram and also watch PBS SpaceTime :)

    But I was referring more to the frame of reference of our universe vs that of being inside a blackhole (assuming you could magically avoid being ripped apart by gravity). To an observer inside a blackhole, "time" on the outside would blink by almost instantly. I wasn't talking about moving through an infinite universe or near/into a black hole. Just stationary, floating just beyond the event horizon, looking out. Hence the asterisk on basically*.

    I was leading them to what MotoAsh posted. But they beat me to it while I was typing.

    Edit: He even references what I'm talking about at 0:44 in the SpaceTime video. But from the frame of reference of an outside observer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Scientist: Scientific discoveries are meaningless when taken out of context.

    Journalist: Scientific discoveries are meaningless.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    another thing I learned at some point: Just because a physics formula returns a result, doesn't mean that it's reality

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Interestingly, galaxies at the edge of our ability to perceive are in fact receding away from us at velocities greater than the speed of light.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Maybe it’s because they are outside the black hole and aren’t time dilated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Wouldn't that mean if we can see them that light can enter/escape a black hole?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Entering and escaping are two wildly different things.

    It can enter, but not escape.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    Light can enter a black hole perfectly fine - we would be able to see things outside of it, because the light is still following us. No light leaves the black hole (if it's past the event horizon), so you can't see into it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Orr, you’re missing the obvious alternative here - the guy was a legendary level scientist, but the government stole his research and threatened his family and sidelined him into being a community college professor so that no one pays attention to his “drivel” so that they continue to control us into being workers for the capitalist pigs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 99 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 119 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Okay, so now you can barely afford your rent inside a black hole. Enjoy the enhanced granularity of your desperation!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That would explain why it feels like my bank account is being sucked dry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 51 points 1 year ago (13 children)
  • [+] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes I know what vacuum decay is, and the thing I referenced, the inflaton field, is a hypothetized false vacuum near the very start of the universe, that went through this exact process, giving rise to our current vacuum and ending the hypothetized inflation era

    I know there's a hypothesis that our current vacuum could be metastable as well, but that's a seperate thing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Well, that might suck slightly less in the long run?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Those are all really interesting factors to consider and I appreciate the response!

    I'll come clean, when I wrote it, I was just making a funny, like... A "decaying vacuum" would suck less over time. . .than a black hole. Lol XD

    To your point though, less likelihood of finding other life is such a wildcard, for sure. (Less likelihood of meeting cool benevolent spacefarers...but also less likely to be spotted by something like Mass Effect's Reapers, or accidentally bring home Xenomorphs or extragalactic pathogens lol)

    And...not being able to ever see the beginning of everything...my curious mind says that'd be such a bummer but also...oddly beautiful? I'll have to ponder that...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Tax breaks for the rich is the only solution

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I suddenly feel something trickling down from above. Is this what they were talking about all these years? Is this a good thing? It smells bad, like really bad. Like somebody is cooking meth while they have a near fatal case of diarrhea. What am I supposed to do?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 66 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    paying rent sometimes feels like throwing money into a black hole

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The same for mortgages too really. All these people out there toting new construction and how it’s good for property values seem to forget that higher property values means 1) higher property taxes, and 2) higher priority values, for when you sell your home and need to buy a new one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Not to mention mortgage rates are so damn high that your mortgage payment is basically like paying rent to the bank because you're barely touching the principal on the loan

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This is part of why I'm planning on over saving for my downpayment. If I'm not paying less than my rent there's no way in hades I'll ever be able to afford repairs

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I just bought a house, and honestly, dont even try to get a above 20% to knock off pmi (assuming thats a thing where you are). When we sold our previous house and did a recast with the proceeds, the difference between hitting 20% and hitting the 20% + $50k was about $200 in monthly payments

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›