[–] 1 point 22 hours ago

Duckduckgo has contracts with microsoft and until backlash give microsoft and linkedin exclusive access to stalk you.

If you want a searchengine thats not serving some mega corp self host searxng.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 22 hours ago

    I think i read about someone who “overdosed” on nutmeg. Did nog get high, slept for a long time only to wale up so dehydrated their eyelids where stuck and couldn’t open.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago

    Surely you understand that there is a difference between the production red blood cells, which are the same at birth and elder age. Versus: The development of the prefrontal cortex which is responsible for processing and adapting one's thinking in order to focus, control how you behave, and make (smart) decisions.

    Which almost all drugs directly interact with.

    Puberty is where your brain learns to find its baselines, to discover who you are. Using drugs from a young age impacts who you might become.

    Now the difference between 18 and 24 isn’t going to be that big and amounts matter. 1 joint at 15 isnt going to harm you more then then alcohol at the same age. But if your baseline is to be impaired all day, thats going to have an impact.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

    Its actually about biological maturity. Your brain is literaly not complete before that.

    I can back this up with scientific sources:

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3621648/

    https://sites.duke.edu/apep/module-3-alcohol-cell-suicide-and-the-adolescent-brain/science-content/brain-maturation-is-complete-at-about-24-years-of-age/

    “the brain rewires itself from the onset of puberty up until 24 years old, especially in the prefrontal cortex.”

    “It is well established that the brain undergoes a “rewiring” process that is not complete until approximately 25 years of age.This discovery has enhanced our basic understanding regarding adolescent brain maturation and it has provided support for behaviors experienced in late adolescence and early adulthood. Several investigators consider the age span 10–24 years as adolescence”

    Speaking from personal experience, i actually felt this. Its similar to the memory of suddenly “waking up to a compleye theory of mind” at around 5yo which many people have. Like the parts of my brain that were otherwise occupied in the background becoming fully accessible to me.

    There might be some truth to what you say if you look at evolution. Cause it does seem like the phase maturity keeps getting longer, but its not something an insividual family can fight within a few generations.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 30 points 5 days ago (7 children)

    There where multiple ongoing anti-drug campaign when i was a teen.

    Many of them framed facts into scare campaigns. The issue was if i lined them all up it became obvious that they could not all tell the truth.

    I was vey naive and it seemed very obvious to not consume something that would kill me. I was never going to touch drugs, why would anyone? Why do we need a police officers visiting my class to tell us the most obvious things in the world.

    At some point i just cracked from the confusion and started doing my own research on the topic.

    As a results i became hugely interested in the matter and they remain one of my special intrest today. Mild altering substances are so fascinating and powerful, and we barely understand them.

    Responsible disclaimer:

    • Drugs have real risks and can be very dangerous, addiction is no joke.

    • While interested i did wait till i was over 18 to start experimenting, with what i know now i recommend waiting till at least 24. Contrary to what laws say an 18yo is not an adult.

    • I knew my limits and remained careful while continuing to apply a scientific rigor trough it all. And in the end i stopped using them at all.

  • source
  •  

    Hi,

    Happy to have found this com,

    I identify as spiritual but not religious and have always been interested in philosophy but i didn’t know what gnosis meant beyond the “relgious (a)gnostic” label used to differentiate between absolute belief that you know god exists vs believing but knowing you can’t really know, therefore accepting others.

    This changed after reading a few pages of the gospel of Judas and it kinda hit me out of left field.

    A summary for those who don’t know (its a few years ago i read it though)

    The story in this book starts with the figure of Jesus ridiculing his followers for they worship Jaweh, a material demigurge that is not god.

    He then singles Judas out for being smarter then to blindly worship this idol and takes him to the side where he first kinda praises Judas for being further then the others. And starts to talk about some mystical story something about a fake and a real temple.

    Judas seems to get really excited by this and starts talking about if Jesus is in this real temple and if they can join them. (Or a dream of their own, cant remember)

    Then Jesus ridicules Judas and says he will never reach the highest heaven but will instead become a star under the demigurge. And then starts to give an entire description of a mythical cosmic pantheon full of numbers.

    Naturally i started researching wtf I just read. it reads like a warning for worshipping religion all together, at the same time its providing a kind of scripture but it feels like bait which Judas has taken and therefore lost.

    Trough research I learned this book was considered one of the oldest gnostic texts, the mythical description and talk of demigurge appears to have been long standing tenets of gnostic religion.

    But at the top, the unknowable, which is koninginly everything aka god aka gnosis.

    This “unknownable” part is what stuck with me.

    Apparently over the ages many gnostic cults have risen up that promised to reveal absolute truth/gnosis.

    But you cannot reveal something that cannot be known. Someone who claims to have obtained gnosis will always be wrong.

    But reaching for gnosis is still a nobel goal, to want to know and get close to the truth.

    It simply seems mature to know the limits of our earthly form that we can never arrive, only attempt to get closer.

    To get as close as one can to gnosis, one must be agnostic.

    Is this a known interpretation? Have others stumbled upon this? I love to heat what people here think.

     

    “The Board of Peace “seeks to promote stability, restore dependable and lawful governance, and secure enduring peace in areas affected or threatened by conflict“

    Its all so stupid if it weren’t tragic.

    Sorry if this doesn’t belong here, i found no better place for sharing this thought.

    view more: next ›