BINGO

The three main onion colors have different strengths.

Red - best raw. Great diced or sliced as a topping for salad for example, pizza, or maybe chili.

White - holds texture very well. "Clean" taste, not overpowering. Great mixed into pico, salsa, etc. Can also be a good topping for chili.

Yellow - best cooked into food. Has highest sugar content, so amazing for low and slow cooking when you want a sweet (carmelized) taste, or just a nice mellow taste in a stew. Not great to eat raw compared to the others.

You say you don't like recipes that call for yellow onions... What do you mean?? You don't like cooked food? Almost every recipe that calls for cooking an onion will call out yellow onions.

Please give examples of recipes that you don't like that call for yellow onions, I will try to work with you. You seem like you are open to new things.

At the end of the day you might just not like yellow onions. But it might be a texture thing (they can get mushy) or you're accidentally putting them on stuff raw when a red/white is more appropriate.

This was mine also.

RIP, Pan

I think you're conflating the term "robotics" with "autonomous robots."

Robotics is a very, very old term.

Automation of robotics in an uncontrolled physical environment is so, so hard to program for.

This is why we got advanced language, music, art, speaking models first. There's SO much of that data (they stole and pillaged every scrap, but the fact is that it exists) that models can be trained on.

There isn't vast stores of raw sensor data that maps physical environments to servo, hydraulic, pneumatics correlated with optical, heat, tactile feedback etc.

If you think about how uncoordinated toddlers are, and how many years it takes to map all the inputs humans receive and learn how that translates to our environment so we can move around without much thought, you'll kind of get what I mean. That information just hasn't been collected on a large scale in a way that machine learning can train on it.

This is the underlying challenge of autonomous robotics. We'll get there, but for now we still need humans controlling pretty much everything that doesn't have an ultra-controlled space like factory floors.

I was in a grocery store the other day and they had some sign on a Roomba looking thing that was struggling to navigate the produce section. I can't imagine how hard it would be to create a machine that can reliably and safely mine ores autonomously.

It's pretty bad lol, but not in a bad way if that makes sense. The actors just hadn't found their roles yet, and the writers hadn't figured out how to use the characters. But it's all worth watching so you can appreciate what it becomes.

Yes. The beginning is rough.

After TnG I think a lot of people would recommend voyager or original series, but I'd recommend DS9. It is more of a prime time soap style vs every episode is an isolated adventure, but it's REALLY good. Just kind of unique series. And again... The beginning is ROUGH. Stick it out though, it gets good.

HIPAA is a framework for CONTROLLED sharing of data.

Privacy = controlled sharing of data

HIPAA has a lot of problems. But it's not some trick.

I shoot an average of 4000 rounds a month. I would bet a whole lot of money that I'm far more familiar with "pistols" in all types than you are.

Revolvers are pistols.

Their recoil is often less than a semi auto. It depends on so many factors that saying they have more or less recoil is a nonsense claim; it depends on your ammo and the mass of the gun, primarily.

Accuracy is the same. Sights matter. Build quality matters. Length of your barrel matters. It all matters.

You can throw a Ruger GP100 in the mud and I'd trust it any day over a Glock covered in mud. It's foolish to claim otherwise.

Glocks are great handguns. But they have malfunctions just the same, especially when you have mags with worn out springs like a lot of daily carry guns do because people pack the mags full and then leave them that way for years on end.

I'm not saying revolvers are better, I'm saying they have pros and cons and it's personal preference. Many people who obviously know more than you do think they're the best guns to carry when you need them most. I won't say I agree or disagree, just that I acknowledge the points, and I'm sharing them here because firearm knowledge is generally abysmal, even in countries where they're readily available.

What? Revolvers are really common. They're incredibly reliable, in a way that a semi auto mag fed pistol isn't.

A revolver rotates the cylinder and the hammer falls on each individual round. If the ammo is bad (incredibly rare but it happens) then nothing happens, but just pull the trigger again and you're not jammed or anything.

A mag-fed semi auto, while higher capacity, has WAY more complicated moving parts. There's tons of ways it can jam up or malfunction, and since all the ammo is stacked in the same spring-tensioned magazine, if there's a problem you have to clear the jam in order to fire anything else.

If you're in a position where you are actually pulling the trigger your fine motor skills are gone because of adrenaline. Clearing a jam like that isn't something you'll be able to do effectively without a ton of training, and most people don't have that kind of training.

So a lot of people prefer a revolver. It's only 6 shots instead of 11, 17, whatever, but you KNOW you'll get six shots, and the thinking is if that's not enough then 17 probably isn't either. It's personal preference.

But yeah, they're not just "grandfather" guns.

Oh yeah I forgot about those!

Seriously. We'd use the family point n shoot for "important" things like family pictures, or vacations. Everything else was a Kodak disposable.

My parents were always naked at home. Like, always. And it was that way pretty much until I grew up.