In German "Beamer" means video projector.
You can change a ton. Especially in an urban sprawl environment.
Urban sprawl means it's comparatively easy for people to get PV, heat pumps for heating/cooling and EV chargers at home.
With that, you make yourself completely independent of high gas prices.
Yes, it has high up-front costs, but the long-term benefits are massive. And with enough pain comes political momentum, which can be used to get state subsidies for that kind of stuff and that way you and your country can become independent of importing fossil fuels while at the same time reducing harm to the climate.
And yes, it needs to hurt quite bad first to cause such a big systematic change.
Poor people are a tiny fraction compared to billionaires per capita.
But not in total. There are much more poor people than billionaires, and even if each billionaire produces 50 000x the emmisions that a poor person does, all in all the emmissions of poor people are quite relevant too.
(From an equality standpoint obviously billionaires should be emmission-capped or taxed to the point that they aren't billionaires anymore, there's no question about that. But poor people's emmissions are still significant and more than relevant to the climate.)
Gas use is pretty elastic, even in Indiana.
If gas is expensive, people tend to buy more fuel-efficient cars (or even electric cars). They drive slower and more fuel efficient. They consider whether a trip is actually worth it and bundle trips. So e.g. instead of driving to the shop for a handful items every day they instead do a weekly shopping trip where they get everything they need for the week.
Just with changing your driving style you can often save a ton of fuel.
The increased prices also mean that shopping in general goes down. If you don't have money for unnecessary garbage you buy less unnecessary garbage, thus again helping the economy.
So yes, even in Indiana where you have to drive to your job, higher fuel prices will lead to benefits for the environment.
Hey, that's totally fine. Nobody forces you to do anything. Run whatever you want on your PC. But don't try to control what kind of software someone else is allowed to run on their system.
You don't want corpos to control what you can do, that's ok.
But you don't get to control what others can do either.
I don't play EAC games, so I don't really have a stake in this.
There are plenty of reasons to run Linux apart from "I want complete and utter freedom" or something like that.
I would gently remind you that we have been giving kernel-level access to e.g. Nvidia for decades too.
It's a trade-off, and there are still plenty of actual day-to-day practical benefits of running Linux beyond philosophy.
Ok, I can prove that at least one right-wing extremist drinks water. Thus everyone drinking water is a right-wing extremist.
It's the same level of logic.
At this point we aren't even talking about fallacies, but rather about the utter absence of any kind of logic reasoning.
The image is from Invincible.
I think the point of the meme is that vibe coders are right-wing extremists or something like that.
If you want best effects, do no more than 2x per week, only when you actually urgently need a boost. Otherwise the one instant per day won't have an effect either.
Not exactly programmer but... The stupidity of some people is impressive.
The problem as that these directives and standards are completely beside the point. They do manage a lot of security-relevant stuff, but in the end what's hacked isn't the documentation the standards require but the actual code running on the machine.
And there's pretty little that the standard can do against actual honest bugs and mistakes in the code.
I think OP is confusing fruit flies with mayflies, some of which really only live for a single day as flies. Some of them even live only for a few minutes as flies. E.g. Oligoneuriella rhenana only lives for about 40 minutes in their adult form.
But they live much longer, some of them up to 4 years, in their non-adult forms.