all 69 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Home only.

Why travel to an arbitrary location to access equipment at a different arbitrary location.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    I'm Team Work Where You Are Best.

    Some people that means an office. Some people it means remote. The plan is the workers do the thing and get the money. A manager needing to see their ass in a chair to feel good about himself is a little creepy.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

    I go in to the office two days a week typically - by choice - because I like the focused office vibe and I want to see my colleagues.

    I pick the days. I don't have to announce them. If my alarm goes off and I feel like "damn I need an extra snooze" then I don't go in. No explanation necessary.

    Before Covid it was five days a week in office. I'm very glad for the choice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    Yeah I live alone and I need to see people daily in person or else I'll go crazy. I love my coworkers.

    BUT every person and workplace is different!!! I'm the same team as you...work where you're best. For those whose jobs are flexible in location, it seems unfair to force someone to do either one or the other.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    As much as I'd love to work from home, I can't. I'm too easily distracted and work would be at the bottom of my priority list at all times.

    I'll happily support all of you home workers, but I can't trust myself to do what I'm supposed to do during "work time".

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

    I think a truly WFH world would force us to fundamentally rethink some of our common infrastructure designs. And one of those would be including multiple different offices in houses. Because most houses and apartments aren’t designed with WFH in mind.

    If you have a dedicated place for work, (instead of a shared space, like a desk that you also use for your personal stuff), it helps you focus. Your brain compartmentalizes the rooms in your house, (which is why you’ll walk into a room and immediately forget what you went in there for,) so having a room that is dedicated to WFH will literally help you avoid distraction. If you try to WFH from the same desk that you play video games at, you’ll feel a constant desire to boot up a game instead of working. And inversely, if you try to play a game at your work desk, playing will begin to feel like a job. Your complaint is perfectly valid, and also so common that it would literally reshape the way our houses are designed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    For me it's the opposite, I'm too easily distracted so all the people talking around me while I try to work make me lose focus. At home I can sit there in peace and quiet and actually make it through a document

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

    Same. My productivity is awful in an office because we had an 'open office' and it was nothing but distractions and noise all day long. Not to mention folks coming up to you and asking you to do stuff verbally, which never got documented and therefore did not count as 'productive' activity.

    at home everything is an email so I have a record of things I do that looks 10x bigger than I did in the office.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    Yeah that is a good point, we also have an open office. I imagine if there were more separation with individual or team offices it would be a lot easier to work there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago*

    it would, but people who design offices are buzzword lemmings who follow trends and don't care about worker productivity objectively.

    my first office had big tall cubes and it was gloriously quiet. we are now on our third office, but since only like 20 people come in on any day, it's much quieter than having 50-80 people, half of whom are blabbing with each other or on the phone and everyone in 30 ft of them can hear their convo.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 days ago

    I’ve been fully remote since 2018 and wouldn’t have it any other way. I can get chores and cooking done during the day, don’t waste time or money commuting, and I’m more available for both work and my family.

    People keep telling me I should “leave my house” and “interact with people” but that’s always fraught with peril and disappointment

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

    From a societal perspective I think we should be working in common spaces so we can be near people and learn to socialize. We’re losing second and third spaces. Fewer people having children also means less forced interaction and I fear we are heading towards a more isolated society.

    Unfortunately, not everyone would lives close enough to comfortably go into an office, which leaves people burning 2-3hrs of their day just doing that. And all the commuting also impacts the Earth.

    Edit: Adding that I mentioned “common spaces” and I did not mean situations where people are forced to work in toxic environments. I have been lucky to develop many friendships and also help support many relationships that have formed in the past place I worked at. The majority of the people around me were introverts, working around like minded people helped all of us.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    I do think the modern workplace isn't really a good place for this either unfortunately. In my field at least it's like everybody is a corporate mercenary. They're going to come in, make no friends, do their jobs and then quietly leave for a higher paying position as soon as they possibly can.

    Which is fine, but it's a pretty poor place to get social nourishment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Yeah, the normal office is not the place to make friends.

    But I guess for a shared workspace for people working remote, it doesn’t really matter what they do or if they change jobs. You can make casual conversation with regulars at the water cooler or coffee bar without the weird forced interactions of working for the same company and “team building”. You’re both in this common space because you want to be there, rather than sitting at home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Yeah, that’s why I mentioned common space, since those people would want to be there. Being forced to do hybrid ends up being weird since most of those people don’t want to be there and it doesn’t really let you form bonds as much.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago* (1 child)

    Mixing your personal and professional life is a surefire way to be create an abusive and exploitative environment.

    The exploitative companies basically want to 'foster togetherness' so they can exploit they works via emotional manipulation techniques, and often seek to isolate workers from the outside world or life outside the office.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago

    This is very much based on the industry of course. I’ve formed life long friendships with people from my last job. I just saw one of them I haven’t worked with in 5 years and likewise a few others during halloween. I was in a position to be able to nurture those friendship and workplace dynamics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    I agree on trying to bring back some semblance of the other spaces, and I'm an introvert. But work isn't ideal for that, not only because of potential turnover, but also the rule of thumb on bringing too much personal stuff into work that can backfire on you.

    How about more work from home where it makes sense, giving more time back that was spent commuting, and a four hour work week with equal or greater pay. Make socializing possible both in time and income given.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

    This is why I actually like my hybrid schedule which is two days in the office and three at home. 1 day per week in office would be enough most of the time, but the regular in person does help with feeling connected for a lot of people but 5 days is massive overkill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    We switched to hybrid once covid died down, but the genie was out of the bottle. Most people didn’t want to come back. Since they also implemented a system where people chose what days they were in, it was hard to get proper overlaps. That company is now fully remote and have leased out their offices. As long as the hybrid is thought out, I do think it can work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    We all had the same days in the office so it was worth being in the office, so that was thought out. Some people don't want to work from home and they work in the office 5 days a week which works for them. I'm just glad we have flexibility!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    I don't want to socialize with or date my co-workers. I don't want to play politics to get promoted or have to befriend my boss or navigate office-relationships where I risk getting fired for offending or rejecting the wrong person. I also have had repeated problems with female co-workers trying to cheat on their partners with me, which I do not miss.

    For me, working from home removed that problems and got me 3 promotions in 6 years. Because what matters now is my work, and I can do it without being distracted or worrying about upsetting a co-worker who will report me for sexual harassment because I rejected their advances.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago*

    I can socialize outside of the workplace, thanks. Why would I want to do that with my coworkers? They're not family and rarely ever have I befriended any and that's fine.

    Edit: I'm all for 3rd places making a comeback, to be clear, but I neither need nor want forced socialization in an office.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    Having your coworkers be your only social interaction is a recipe for being exploited.

    Third spaces are fine but if you make me come into an office for teamwork I’m finding another job that doesn’t make me pay to commute and be away from home.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago (1 child)

    Hybrid, leaning towards office. At home I just can't manage to manage myself.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago

    You should have the option always. If you can work without burning fossil fuels to get to a place of work, you should.

    I'm 50/50. In my own job there are a lot of days where I am just sitting at my laptop doing drawings or inventory calculations or other menial bs. I try to work from home where I can, and it honestly is fine with me. If I do it more than 2 or 3 days in a row though I start to feel brain rot creeping in from too much sameness.

    The rest of the time I am frequently handling supplier product samples, prototype test units, taking first article measurements, and doing other shop stuff for other people in the company. I can't really work from home in those situations but it keeps my mind active and moving.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago

    WFH because 1) it's better for the environment 2) people I don't want to see are at the office 3) I don't wanna commute 1 hour one way 4) fuck getting up early 5) we call people that aren't in the office anyway, which defeats the point of showing up, and 6) I hate my job.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 days ago

    Work from home. I've really worked very little in an office, I find it unnecessary for collaboration and much more distracting than working from home.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago

    Office. For me personally: I like the contact with colleagues, I am more efficient in the workplace.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago

    Team hybrid FTW.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 days ago

    Home only.

    Private bathroom. Private break room with full kitchen. No commute. No pants. What's not to love?

    Plus, from the comfort of my home, behind the shield of a screen, I'm comfortable enough to say things and conduct myself in ways that are absolutely necessary to effectively do my job, but would never feel comfortable doing face-to-face.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 days ago

    WFH.

    Working at the office would mean buying a car, getting insurance, paying for parking and adding another 1.5 hours to my day. It's not worth it.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 day ago

    Work at 'office' only. For sure!
    But that's because I work with radioactive materials and I don't want them in my home.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago

    I’ve been wfh for i6 years, it would suck to go back now

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 days ago

    Before COVID, I thought 100% wfh would be the bee's knees.

    It was not

    I learned that even identifying as an introvert, I need more social contact than just my spouse and dog. 2-3 days in office would be optimal but if I have to choose all on-site or all wfh, I think it has to be all on-site.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    I'm a carpenter, so I don't work from home or in an office. However.

    If your job could be done in a WFH context and you would rather be in an office, respectfully, I absolutely cannot understand where you're coming from. Working from home sounds awesome.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)

    I could work from home every day if I wanted to, but I still choose to come into the office once or twice a week.

    WFH is awesome, don't get me wrong, but I need to see human beings from time to time. I start to feel very isolated if I work from home exclusively for more than two to three weeks.

    So if I had to choose between full office or full WFH, for the sake of my mental health, I think I'd choose the office.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    I live in a tiny micro studio apartment by myself - I could definitely work from home there but I'd quickly turn into an un-socialized hermit doing that long term. For better or worse I find there's some value actually getting myself out of the house and interacting with people IRL even if it's just work stuff.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    Home except for rare occasional meetings for part of a day. Quarterly or maybe monthly.

    I've worked from home for years. No horrid office lights, no people chatting or other sounds, just concentration and productivity.

  • source
  • Office only, work from home is only allowed under very rare circumstances. Engineering for industrial manufacturing and if I worked from home about 80% of the questions I'd have would be answered by physically being there and watching the equipment run.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago*

    There is no question that I prefer WFH, and I'm lucky enough to have an employer that doesn't care about commercial real estate profits and would prefer to keep the money they would otherwise spend on renting office space.

    Within our group we have application support people who do in-person support of our users and workstations. That team does hybrid WFH and has a rotating schedule so there is always one person at each site every day.

    There are other teams that don't actually have to be next to the user for support. Those teams are primarily WFH.

    I was primarily on site through the pandemic and transitioned to WFH after things opened up.

    Back when I was mostly on site, I would get concerned about things not getting done when I was WFH. Since I've switched to primarily WFH, I get concerned about things not getting done when I'm on site.

    The only time I experienced any feeling of social isolation was at the height of the pandemic when I was on-site and alone in an office. I'm no less alone when I'm working from home now, but it doesn't bother me.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    I like my hybrid schedule, it has a nice balance of being able to actually interact with people at the office and the flexibility of wfh.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    Working in the office is really nice, I enjoy it when I go. But the extra 3 hours of commute time added to my day really tire me out and make it hard to keep on top of the housework needed to stay alive.

    When I stay home I have more of my life together. When I go to the office I have more of my work together. It seems I can't have both. Hybrid is the best for me, but if I had to choose, WFH only. I would simply perish if I had to work 5 days a week. I would eat only cup noodles, the house would be filthy, I would have nearly 0 clean clothes.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 days ago

    Home only for me. I just find myself a lot more productive when I'm not distracted by everything else happening around me in the office.

    Meetings are easier through Zoom when you don't have to worry about the logistics of reserving conference rooms and managing AV equipment, even when you have to deal with the occasional person who forgets to mute themselves.

    I save a lot of money not having to drive and pay for gas. I save a lot of time not having to spend 45-ish minutes each way on a commute. And I eat healthier when I have time to prepare my own meals, while I'm too tempted to buy fatty food from the office cafe for lunch or buy fast food during my commute when I feel like I don't have enough time to cook and meal prep.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    A mix, mostly from him (I get more done), but face-to-face is good for meetings and socialising (which is important to keeping a group working well together)

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    Hybrid. Getting up that early and dealing with traffic/the subway is a $$ PITA. But there are some things I can only do in the office, so I'm WFH mon-tues until someone tells me I can’t.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    I'm an office kind of person. I need a designated place to work. I also find that coworkers are less communicative when working remote.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    And then there are the days when you haul ass out of bed and fight your way in to the office, only to find that the network’s having problems and you have to work on the WiFi anyway. Why am I here, again? 🙄

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 days ago

    In the summer I like to go in so they can pay for air conditioning, in the winter I like to stay home so I don’t have to drive in the snow (I have to run the furnace either way so the pipes don’t freeze, so no energy saving there)

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    I got wfh briefly when our offices flooded, and whatever undiagnosed things I have going on in my brain would not let me focus on my work in any way, shape, or form.

    I wasn’t running around doing home things or playing video games or anything. I was sat in front of my computer, mentally incapable of doing the job I was trained in and skilled at. My brain just refused to go into work mode. My anxiety spiked and I got so frustrated at my mental block that I was in tears at one point. As soon as the officer was open, I returned before anyone else.

    I like the idea of wfh, and will definitely try it again one day, but it seems that I need the change of environment to get my brain into gear.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Personally, it entirely depends on:

    • how far way I am from the office
    • how many other people are in the open office

    If I were 5 minutes walk from the office, I would walk there because it provides better separation from work. It would be much easier to tell the boss "sorry boss, I am not at the office and thus I cannot take a look". Not that my current dayjob has much of this, but, structurally, it would make it much better.

    On the other hand, at home I get the benefits of peace and quiet. I am going to be on calls with remote people anyway, so I would rather not deal with echos, or noise from other people having their meetings. I also realize that I am a bigger bother in person because I will do the in-person equivalent of shooting off a slack message. A slack message can be snoozed. I cannot be snoozed when I talk to the person next to me. And, sure, I try not to, but it is a thing I do.

    I am currently 100% remote, though, and it is one of the reasons I am not even attempting to look for another job. I get so much flexibility because I can just take my laptop with me and work from wherever the internet hotspot allows.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    I could but team work office over home better.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    I do better at home and save 2+ hours a day of commuting time. There are fewer interruptions at home and most of my work is computer-based. However, I currently only WFH one day a week (officially).
    Ideally a hybrid would be best for me; I would WFH M/W/F and in office T/R.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    I don't drive and I'm out in the middle of the suburbs, so commuting is rough.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago

    Thank god my work doesn't involve using the computer so my pick is neither but if I absolutely had to choose then I'd rather go to office than work from home. I still get the occasional custom order that I have to manufacture at home so I know how difficult it is to get anything done when there's no-one holding me accountable.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago*

    I'm a millennial. The world has had complete overhauls every 10 years since I was born

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago*

    I am for fully remote work. But there are a number of conditions here:

    First of all, if you are a remote worker, you need to delineate zones. You shouldn't work from bed or from a sofa in front of the TV. Set up a workspace for yourself. It could even be just an old table on a loggia. But it must physically exist.

    Secondly, you cannot stretch time. If you work in a team, try to stick to a common schedule or discuss time zones in advance. There is nothing worse than a situation where you need to resolve an urgent issue, but the person who has the knowledge to solve it will only be online in 5 hours.

    Thirdly, you need to have enough motivation to carry out the previous two points. This is important.

    If all this works out, then remote work is magnificent. The commute to work is zero, and lunch can be whatever you want. It also solves the problem of open-plan offices. In recent years, they have turned the interior zones of those offices into warehouses filled with desks. It's terrible.

    Personally, I work from home, and in the evening I leave the apartment to go for a walk or sit in a park. This is enough to not feel lonely. Especially since the commute to work used to take me 1 hour in the morning and 1 hour back in the evening. In that time, you could sit through a movie session and still have time for go home from movie theater.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 days ago

    Hmm. My work wasn't just sitting in front of the computer, though that was about 2/3 of it. I had access to a fairly complete shop for building things, and I liked that part of the work, too.

    I'd probably go to the office. But, there were people who worked there that never left their chair, and communicated by email and phone, so they could have been at home, and I wouldn't have missed them.

  • source