[–] 10 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I do think the modern workplace isn't really a good place for this either unfortunately. In my field at least it's like everybody is a corporate mercenary. They're going to come in, make no friends, do their jobs and then quietly leave for a higher paying position as soon as they possibly can.

Which is fine, but it's a pretty poor place to get social nourishment.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 17 points 11 hours ago

    I also feel like I hold the Enterprise to a higher standard so it makes some of the culture shock episodes come across differently than DS9.

    Like you're here on a diplomatic mission and you're coming off a little snooty and elitist to this species you clearly don't trust or respect. Beverly all but labels the Ferengi scientist in Suspicions "one of the good ones".

    DS9 if they're actually insulting each other but still managing to live in proximity to one another it's a little charming because they're working through tensions they can't really avoid. They're not all professionals on a mission of peace, they're people living and working in a culturally diverse and very politically contested place.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 12 points 13 hours ago

    I agree Lemmy has a negativity problem, disagree it's driving off new users. If negativity drove people away Twitter and Reddit would be ghost towns. If anything people crave it.

    The problem with negativity is it tends to drive positive people away. People stop bothering trying to have actual discussions because if you express anything resembling positivity someone is eager to respond with a memey "Oh you sweet summer child".

    Eventually every interaction is like that, nobody feels like talking to each other and just want to one-up one another in how cynical and world weary they are. Happens long enough and you get reddit, happens even longer and the cynicism turns to nihilism and it turns into an incel space.

    It'll have users, it just won't be pleasant to use.

  • source
  • view more: next ›