fyi: it's "drugs"

top 95 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 90 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 128 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Is the censored word drags?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 53 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Why is drugs considered a more upsetting word than rape? Like literally what the fuck

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago

    ragebait repost from corporate social media: it's quite common there to censor random letters and words, or make some deliberate grammar mistakes, so people will comment about it and will boost the post organically. I hate that it appears here as well, because people just mindlessly repost it with the builtin bait

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    If this is genuine: it’s drugs. This is about the cornell rape.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    It's not genuine. It's making fun of the fact that the post chose to censor one letter from the word "drugs" despite it being painfully obvious what that one letter was, and the fact that the far more offensive word "rape" went through uncensored twice.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Mom always ruined my birthdays 😔

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Hey, I'd just be excited to have a cool new friend to do drugs with, and if I take off my clothes it's not sexual, it's purely about being on the same mental level

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    For me it’s more likely to be “Jesus fuck how is it so hot all of a sudden?”

    🎯 1
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago

    Some people see the naked girl railing lines on the couch and think, "oh dear I hope she's SAFE, I hope she learns self control". I see someone that I can sit there on molly with for the next hour while she trauma dumps and I'm like "damn girl that is seriously crazy you've been through so much, damn, that's life though right??"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    I've always been a total wierdo, but even at sixteen, when I was a desperate, frustrated incel, if a girl (in this case, a peer) had to get sloshed to be into me, it'd freak me out.

    Pretty much through my entire romantic career, meeting at a bar instead of a café was a red flag. Sex always seemed like a sober activity. Or more exactly, sex supplies its own drugs. Morover, once someone was not coherent enough to do crosswords, it was clear they weren't clear headed enough to consent to fluid exchange.

    Granted, there are two factors that inform this attitude: One is my parents were sloppy drunks and went to sloppy-drunk parties. And I never wanted to be like that. The other is I made my way into the kink community in my twenties, and mixing drugs or booze with kink was geberallt generally known to be dangerous like mixing drugs and booze with motor vehicles or guns. (At least in my corner of the kink community. Also breath-control was a no-no and kids seem to be choking each other all over the place, nowadays.)

    But then, I've never been a frat dude, or even the kind of guy who'd ever be sponsored to join a Greek house.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    Kinda same. Even in my most incel times my most fucked up fantasies there the other party was getting totally ravaged, the reason it was sexy was because they consented, because they wanted it, because they were feeling pleasure from it. It was sexy because I was able to empathize with the imaginary other.

    I guess fantasy me doesn't really care about hammered sex, but real me would never be that hammered and would instantly be worried if the OP happened, can't get aroused if I'm worried. Crazy how some guys are.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    I want to live in a world where all women feel completely safe running around stark naked.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 month ago (9 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (8 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (6 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 91 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    mhm mhm

    but also do not show up naked to a party unless it's a nude party cause otherwise thats literally sexual harassment

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Don't do it if you're a man. If you're a woman, it's not really going to bother anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Hard disagree. Don't be like that, enforce equality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Women are simply inherently less scary to see naked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    It's so strange to me that the argument of she was drunk and / or on drugs so strange.

    These are reasons that she could never consent. Therefore any sexual act with her would be assault

    It feels so weird to me that they think this is some kind of "gotcha".

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago* (10 children)

    Is there a handy rhyme (like with snakes) to help the average so-and-so spot these rapists in the wild?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Collar touches shoulder, be a little bolder. Collar touches ears, believe your fears.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Is this supposed to make no sense?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    I think the implication is that a simple collar, like a dog collar or a lock collar implies someone who is a sub who may appreciate being approached.

    If they have a full latex suit or something that goes from their clavicle all the way up their neck to their ears, maybe you want to be wary they are a dominatrix about to beat your ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Fyi it takes 5 seconds to edit the words back in...or just rewrite this yourself. It's text on white background.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Took my brain 0 seconds to auto correct though. Hardly seems worth the effort.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 month ago

    It's a principal thing. Censorship on corporate social media trains people how to think and what's okay or not okay to talk about. Importing that shit here I think it's harmful. I care, you don't. Okie dokie.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    Seeing people defend the Cornell 7 has made me want a fucking matriarchy

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    I wanted one since long before then. I am a bit worried we'll end up with a strongly conservative matriarchy that won't look severely different than what we have now, but I think the only chance we have to swing left of 'left' is to shake up the patriarchy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Changing the boot rarely helps. Anarchy would be the true change.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Anarchy sounds nice until you have a task big enough to require people to work together, or to do shitty work no one wants to do, or to deal with outside aggressors, or to resolve conflict.

    There's probably something in between anarchy, dictatorship, republic, communism that works, but we haven't found it yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 weeks ago (1 child)

    This has been solved many many times. Kropotkin addresses this in Mutual Aid. You form confederations, and call regular meetings to form pacts and mutual trade.

    Ironically anarchy doesn't mean no governance, it means no state and government. A good anarchist society would have plenty of agreed upon rules and expectations, they just wouldn't be enforced by a body of monopolistic violence.

    Villages of quisi to fully anarchist peoples operated for centuries and millennia in this form of communal structure until the nation-state was born in the late medieval ages and spread abroad through European colonialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    The outside aggressors are a legitimate problem, but anarchist societies (e.g. Catalonia) have dealt with the others just fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    One might argue that a 3-year test just post civil war wasn't a solid shakedown cruise.

    I'm fairly certain the US would just devolve into internal armed conflict and a return to slavery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 weeks ago

    Alternatively, one could argue that they accomplished quite a lot in the context of wartime shortages of resources, betrayals, etc. Just as one example, they expanded bus service all over Barcelona while also making it free and more frequent, by having the bus workers run everything democratically.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Perhaps, but since just about every other system has already devolved into internal armed conflict and slavery at various points, it seems like a good idea to try the one that hasn't yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I feel the rave/techno scene is like that (at least in Europe)…. And among all my friends that got raped/SA I didn’t heard yet a single one that got raped at a rave/techno party. Not saying it doesn’t happen but it feels much less than “socially respectable” parties, ex boyfriends, friends of friends, etc.

    I wonder if it is because people that are attracted by that scene are in a certain way or the community has a strong culture of consent or something else.

    But I would love to read if there is any statistical study on correlation between certain “scenes” and sexual abuse… and if there is a rational explanation on the causation

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    But I would love to read if there is any statistical study on correlation between certain “scenes” and sexual abuse…

    I fear rave metrics are probably mostly impossible to collect. Anonymous events with illegal substances don't generate a lot of usable data

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    it's "drugs"

    Who would have thought?!

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If someone shows up drunk and naked and starts taking drugs you should stay away from them no mater which sex they are. I mean stay away forever.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

    If both people show up drunk and take drugs, who is the rapist? both? neither? o.O

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

    it me i'm the woman who would do this

    okay maybe not stark naked but definitely at least tits out

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

    I had a man apologize to my husband once because he saw my tits.

    I fumed. My husband doesn't own my tits. Those are my tits! I'll show 'em if I fucking wanna.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I get the notion of this but in college if someone shows up at my party sloshed, does drugs, and passes out. They're getting raped in a different way; the EMS and hospital bill. Sorry, no one wants to deal with that shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    And then their parents would be getting the explanation of benefits. At least that was the concern I heard when I was in college. Didn't matter we still has the ambulance come.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Sounds like you helped people out. It's all fun until you learn limits. And I can't stress enough that people don't want to deal with seizures (when spice was popular) or people puking.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    If someone is high on drugs and/or drunk, does that also mean I can rob them without consequences, or the rule only applies for rape?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    If they're naked they're not going to have a lot of possessions :(

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›