all 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 216 points 1 month ago (11 children)
  • [–] 38 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Where is XP and Vista on this chart. Millennium edition is missing but we don't count That one anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    They're all NaN and were discarded at outliers... Yeah, they're that bad compared to 2000.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

    If you could get *Windows ME to install without crashing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    ME was the abbreviation for Millennium in Windows ME.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 83 points 1 month ago* (7 children)

    It is worth noting that the same metric is the exact reason that web browser version numbers are so ridiculous.

    What's that saying? Something about the moment a metric is used to measure performance, it ceases to be a good metric.

    That's what's happening here. In one of the stupidest ways possible.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Here's an episode of the excellent "99 percent Invisible" design podcast that interviews a philosopher who ho has written about this topic! https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/673-the-score/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I listen to 100 percent invisible, thanks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Oh yeah, Firefox used to take years to change major version number, then they changed to... what was it now, a 6 week schedule? To keep up with Chrome's versions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    They are not ready for my Xbox 360

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Meanwhile, Atari is off the scale

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    My old Amstrad CPC6128 isn't too shabby either

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 49 points 1 month ago (29 children)

    Chrome bumped its versioning numbers to overtake Firefox back in the day, that’s how we ended up with stupid version numbers like 124.1.2 instead of meaningful versions.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (23 children)

    I've started using CalVer (so a relase in October 2026 would be numbered 26.10). This is just so much better for end-user applications.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    What's the benefits here? Why is the semver even bad to begin with? I'm not sure why I'd care that it's in the hundreds. It's a number, right?

    Dates - I can just look at the release date if I want that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    SemVer simply has no meaning to end users.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    By definition, SemVer is supposed to have meaning to end users. If you see the third number increase, no worries, it's just bugfixes.

    If you see the second number increase, well, in theory no worries, it's just cool new features but doesn't break anything you were doing, whatever you were doing should keep on working as always, and you can explore the new features at your leisure.

    The first number changes: beware, something you may be used to can change/go away so it's not necessarily a slam dunk to update that.

    The problem is that many projects just call it SemVer when they just play with arbitrary numbers. I'll call it "Marketing Versioning".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    you can tell SemVer works because this is the first time i’ve ever seen it explained, but i already understood all of it just from using programs (and reading changelogs)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I just don't see what the point is of making the version the date. If I care about time then look up the release date metadata associated with the version.

    Semver shows breaking changes. That seems more important than time to me, and I'd think for most people. Calver implies to me that people are manually reviewing releases and going "yeah this date is more recent so I think I'll go with that one" which makes no sense to me. Basically everyone has some automated update system.

    What does matter to me is if an update with break anything or includes new features.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    SemVer isn't bad, but it's kind of pointless in the browsers. The value in SemVer is if you realistically promise to take bumping that first number seriously. Implying you take backwards compatibility seriously, and bugfixes seriously enough to keep patching an 'old' version. If you just maniacally bump the 'backwards incompatible change' number and never bother to revisit old releases, then I don't really care about the SemVer.

    Of course, I also don't necessarily care about the CalVer either if there's update notification in play, the browsers will aggressively let you know you need an update. However if update notification isn't working or otherwise isn't in play, then CalVer can at least make you think "24.7... that seems like it might be old, maybe I should look for updates". In Windows world the CalVer has been informative as the system or corporate IT screw up has frozen a device at 22H2 and trigger some manual effort to figure out/fix whyever the hell the system won't go to new functional levels.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    Why not just do 2026.10 then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Because it's clearly not 1926 and it likely will not be around in 2126.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Maybe the software will be around in 2126, but I most certainly won't, not my problem 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 93 points 1 month ago (15 children)

    So... apparently Dragon Naturally Speaking (version 16!) has them all blown out of the water....

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    God that app was such trash. Voice recognition simply did not work in the 2000s yet everybody and their mother tried to push it upon us 20 years too soon, just like they're trying to do now with LLMs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Remember when windows vista itself came with a voice to text assistant / keyboard thing?

    I remeber trying to train that software for hours as a kid just for it to still not understand me half the time lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Ironically, it was LLMs that made voice recognition work, but nobody is interested in pushing them anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    I don't know to me the level it worked, is what makes it really silly to me that so few things can handle local transcription today without cloud services. I felt like it was 99% accurate running on a crappy win XP system with like 256 MB ram. Seems to me that it's crazy that 20 years later we're "well we need to hook you up to a supercomputer to do that".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago

    Important info: Sashi is supposedly a shitposter.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Has anyone checked on Bonzi Buddy lately, I think it's time to unfreeze him

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I sorta remember that I think... But my mind keeps going back to kittens shoved into glass vases for internet shock value. Bonzai kitties was a whole thing in the wild west of the internet and it shouldn't be forgotten.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    wild west of the internet

    you mean the free internet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Hunh. So it tracks, then? Throwing the gates wide for the desperate plebs to run amok across the lands, chasing dreams of a better life —just softening up the resistance of those who came long before and effectively paving the way with their blood, sweat, and sundry lives.

    The playbook hasn't changed in centuries.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This is a joke right? tell me it is please

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    This is also why I use AMD over NVIDIA.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    AMD consumer GPU numbers are I think in the 9000s while Nvidia's are only in the 5000's or maybe 6000's.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I'm literally the oldest I've ever been in my entire life!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    Shit like this would be laughed at by my professors. What a bunch of goons

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    Windows 2000 has entered the chat

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    crushing at saying stupid shit? both are gleefully sloppy

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago
    [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I would like to welcome Sashi to try my new Ollama modelfile, HehoAI 69420

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Heh, guess Gemini wasn't even worth including

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    c/unexpectedFactorial

  • source
  • Clearly no AI can maintain an erection the way I do. It's like a baby's arm holding and apple, if the apple was of the Butchered Circumcision variety. Not as good for baking as the Grannie Smith or the Dutchmeal Sweets, but it holds turgid enough for penetration, so it's whatever. And no AI can replace me, and you're stuck with me for eternity cuz I know the true nature of reality and it's a dog shit fucked in my ass cream last night, lengthwise in order to support the Huns invasion of Bulgaria.

  • source