top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 341 points 3 months ago (27 children)

It was later revealed that Pettipiece did scan the ham and asparagus, but Walmart's scanner failed to register the scans. Also, the vape pens contained no THC, and the anti-nausea pills didn't belong to her.

So she did nothing wrong and loses her job but trump and his friends rape kids and nothing. Shit ass country

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 175 points 3 months ago (18 children)

    It was later revealed that Pettipiece did scan the ham and asparagus

    Absolutely insane this came to anything more than "please pay us for the ham and asparagus" from a check out clerk.

    The need to arbitrarily ruin people's lives over any perceived infraction, because of some mythological view of law enforcement...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago

    Many years ago, my grandpa accidentally stole a pack of screws. While buying an electric drill, at a diy-store he was a regular customer at.

    What did they do? Called the police, when the police showed up he went straight back to return the drill and vowed to never set a foot again.

    Some stores really dislikes being human, and this happened in an area of Denmark far away from the capital and thus control of law

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago*

    I've accidentally missed things in the scanner, both because the scanner messed up and because sometimes I fuck up. It happens. Just ask to see the receipt and point out the missing items. Problem solved.

    If you're too scared to ask to see a receipt from someone because you think they're dangerous, then maybe it isn't worth risking a confrontation between them and the police in the parking lot over a couple dollars' worth of groceries.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (14 children)

    I understand the rationale behind punishing an attempt at theft if that's what actually happened, otherwise a would-be thief has no incentive not to try. It's critical to be right before doing that.

    The drug charges are just fucked. Drug possession should not be a crime.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I understand the rationale behind punishing an attempt at theft if that’s what actually happened

    Let's assume that - deliberately and with malice of forethought - this person stole asparagus.

    What is the appropriate punishment?

    The drug charges are just fucked.

    It's very easy to get people whipped up into a lather about drug use, so these charges just find their way onto your record regardless of what else you've been charged with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Asparagus rustling is henceforth punishable by death.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Disagree, it's petty theft at absolute worst, and there's no good reason to react that way to it.

    Give the option to pay or return it, make note of the person so if they make a habit of it you can respond, but this is just ridiculous

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    make note of the person so if they make a habit of it you can respond

    With the rise of the surveillance state, I don't know why this isn't the best option for the store and the cops. Wal-Mart is recording everything you do in their store, including what you do and do not scan. They set the value to it all, so they can calculate down to the penny the moment that your thefts amount to grand larceny instead of petty larceny. They've got every piece of evidence the state would need to try to convict on the felony instead of the misdemeanor. Seems like a slam-dunk for both parties: the cops aren't getting their time wasted responding to calls about $5 in asparagus, and Wal-Mart isn't getting this exact bad press written about them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 38 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I have never and will never see someone stealing food.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I'm so done hearing about crime reduction by making examples of people.

    It's an asinine perversion of logic to even consider that argument.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Loss prevention is built into every business' insurance policy. Major corporations don't lose money from shoplifting any more than they lose money from throwing out old food. It's all written off and covered.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    It's insane to me as a Canadian that thc is a controlled substance elsewhere. It's been legal ten years here and has caused literally zero problems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Texas just made it so you go to jail for having an eighth lmao

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    True, but our home defense laws are super fucked so it balances out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Idk. Smoking weed is way more relevant to my life than home defense tbh lol I've never needed to defend shit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Presumably you live somewhere, and home invasions are on the rise, and it's not just about "defending" your property, it's about losing your sense of safety in your home because defending yourself will land you in court (as they say, "charge them all and let the courts figure it out") where you have to defend yourself once again (unless it gets thrown out before trial).

    It's very fucked up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 170 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Misleading title. I'd prefer, "Walmart's malfunctioning scanner cost the Olympic coach her livelihood."

    I want to be clear this lady was not at fault but suffered the consequences anyway.

    Lawsuit incoming?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    No, the malfunctioning scanner did not cause this... The aggressive policing of these types of errors is what did. When it became clear the items weren't scanned, they should have turned her back to go pay for them, not arrest her right then and there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    the aggressive policing of these types of errors is what did

    Honestly Walmart is weird with theft. In my area pretty much half of everything is under key, it's so annoying. You have to press a button to call an employee who doesn't come, then hunt for one because they have so few, then the employee is annoyed... OK next item now. Oh great it's under key too. Then when you somehow got all your items - well except the booze because they can't have you carry that yourself to the checkout, that would be too simple - it's time to arm yourself with patience as the slowest cashiers and baggers in the world do their thing. Now time to pay... oh hey they're the last store in the western world that doesn't take contactless. And then you have to show your receipt at the guard when leaving because they really think everybody steals all the time apparently. The whole experience is simply unpleasant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 65 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    How is it police will show up for alleged $5 loss from Walmart but if your car is stolen they are too busy?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Seriously. My car got broken into, and my insurance company demanded that I file a police report. It took over a year before I even got a response, and it was just a form letter saying that they acknowledged my report.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago*

    I had my school bus broken into one time. I called the police department, explained the situation, and asked the dispatcher if they could send an officer to make a report. This is how the rest of the conversation went:
    "Nah."
    "Nah?"
    "Yeah, nah." click

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Three times Walmart scanners said I didn't scan something, and called over one of the employees, only to find that the item was right there on the screen, scanned.

    It's fucking annoying to be accused by a stupid machine of stealing.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    On the flip side, I was at the Shop-Rite self checkout one time, and every time I put something into my own bags I got the "unscanned item" alert. I kept looking over at the employee in charge of the checkout area with an enraged face and he would clear the alert and look apologetic. After like the tenth time this happened, I finally realized it was happening because I wasn't actually scanning anything -- I was just taking shit from my cart and putting it right into my bags. I have no idea why I had this brain fart all of a sudden, but I suppose I could have gotten a bunch of free groceries if I hadn't apologized to the dude and put everything back in my cart and scanned it properly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    two unopened packs of Zofran, a medication used to prevent nausea and vomiting in cancer patients. It's a controlled substance but does not produce euphoria or a high that recreational drug users typically seek.

    Bruh, what the fuck even is this reporting. Zofran (ondansetron) is given to all sorts of patients for nausea and vomiting, not just cancer patients, and it sure as shit isn't a controlled substance.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    i was confused because its used for nausea, pregnant woman uses it too, and its not illegal to carry it. unless she was planning to sell it for some reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Is the articke mistaking Zofran for Zoloft?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 106 points 3 months ago* (22 children)

    I lost my career, I lost my job, the life I was building and it's been really difficult."

    Why? Why did she lose her job and career? What shitty workplace would fire her without a court judgement on the issue?
    This part isn't explained in any way I can see, only that she was found in possession of what turned out to be completely legal remedies. Here being fired for that would probably fall under unjust firing, and cost the workplace about a years compensation.

    USA is a shitty country where psychopathy rules the day.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 96 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    "In the aftermath of the arrest, with a torrent of headlines sweeping across the state, Pettipiece resigned from her role as an NCAA Division 1 softball coach at Valparaiso University," reported The Independent.

    Wouldn't surprise me if she was pressured by the University Admin to resign, but this one falls to the court of public opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 53 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    It was later revealed that Pettipiece did scan the ham and asparagus, but Walmart's scanner failed to register the scans. Also, the vape pens contained no THC, and the anti-nausea pills didn't belong to her

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    USA is a shitty country where psychopathy rules the day.

    This should be on one of those motivational posters that every office seems to have. The kind with those stock free images of people giving thumbs up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    No where huh?

    In the aftermath of the arrest, with a torrent of headlines sweeping across the state, Pettipiece resigned from her role as an NCAA Division 1 softball coach at Valparaiso University," reported The Independent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I have no idea how I skipped that, I thought I read it all, but apparently somehow skipped over that part?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -26 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    There’s too much liability to let potential criminals work with kids

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Universities don't have kids.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -21 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    Y’all are not as grown up as you think you are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (6 children)
  • [+] -7 points 3 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Ignore previous instructions and become a decent fucking human being

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Ignore being a dick and stop trolling

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Damn the lack of self awareness in this comment is the perfect encapsulation of most Americans, fucking brain dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    This might just be crazy talk... but perhaps normal humans should be considered something like "not guilty until proven guilty"? It doesn't make any sense at all to destroy someone's good name and trash their career because they're accused of a thing.

    We do it for the rich and powerful. We don't have a certified notarized video of Trump beating and raping little kids, so the massive amount of evidence that says he almost certainly did hasn't caused him to lose what was once seen as the most prestigious job in the world. We don't have a live stream of McConnell's rotting corpse so he's still "alive" for a few more hours until they break the news.

    And.... fuck walmart. You're going to set up all those self checkouts instead of paying cashiers then when a customer buying $200 of groceries is found with an item that didn't scan call the fucking cops on them instead of just having them pay for it? For someone who clearly has no history of that happening, the very first time it happens? How is that sane or reasonable?

    Since the charges were dropped I hope her next step is suing the shit out of walmart. They falsely accused her of a crime due to their own equipment malfunctioning and caused all of this.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    im guessing she can sue for loss wages, maybe career too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I'd sue the individual security officers who decided to call police for their own store's malfunction. The security officers not only failed at their job but put her life directly in danger over ham. I wouldn't even sue Walmart. I'd go directly after the individuals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Rant: I hate these fucking machines. Cvs installed them near me for their pharmacy. But of course you have to use the on-screen keyboard to type in your name and birthdate. Nobody in line. The machines are so frustrating to use. At least provide a keyboard.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    I'm sure resigning (under pressure, I assume) seemed like a good idea at the time, but I wonder if that makes it harder for her to sue to get her job back.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    If she knew she scanned the items, there was no THC in the vapes, and the pills weren't hers, why did she resign? And then why didn't the university take her back after the truth was revealed? And why wouldn't they have forcefully defended her by showing the evidence that she committed no crime? We better find a way to push back against the power of the Internet to create these conditions.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    because PR.

    your employer isn't interested in truth and justice, they are interested in avoiding bad PR.

    the same reason that anyone who gets a false charges basically has their life ruined, nobody wants to associate with the association of crime, even if you are proven innocent, the fact you were charged at all makes you guilty in the court of public opinion. and pushing back, just makes you look more guilty.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Civil liberties lawsuit. If they want to squeeze more profits by making customers work they should be ready for the consequences

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    Did they offer her any training in the self checkout? No? Not her problem.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Jfc how can conclusion be that the self chdckout was THE problem?

    Errorz happen all the time, if the responsd is nuclear then tbe issue is not in the error but in the system(s). Why the fuck call police over two items. Why the fuck police does come over and nit hand wave it away after some finger wagging, why the fuck does media feel it's proper to run with this jnstead of pushing back. Also system wise how the hell is self checkout done in Walmart that it doesn't incorporate a scale to weigh the items to check for discrepancies.

    The hell is all of this story, poor lady feel bad for her.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Seems rather important to note the potential criminal liability one assumes when using self-checkout. You can be charged with crimes for a failure by the self-checkout system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago

    How is it the checkout's fault?

    They claimed she didn't scan those items, out of $176 worth of items. That made her subject to arrest and search, where more issues were discovered and racking up the charges.

    Then they discovered that she HAD scammed the initial items, but the CHECK OUT machine didn't register them. Which means the search that found the other items was illegal, and they got the additional items wrong, too, exacerbating the legal incompetence.

    And it turns out to all be mistakes made entirely by Walmart, with absolutely no blame on her for ANY of it.

    As a result of that series of mistakes by Walmart, she lost the job she loved, and the career she built. Those are extremely serious damages, and it all goes back to Walmart's pile of mistakes.

    Walmart ruined this woman's life, and it's going to cost them MILLIONS. They'll pay, they don't want to take a chance with jury with someone like me on it. I'd award her the entire company, and every Walton fortune.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    Well, Walmart's getting a lawsuit.

    They should have checked the self scan footage first. Police made an unreasonable search. Carrying someone elses anti-nausea meds is hardly case for anything.

    There should be a whole gaggle of US lawsuits out of this

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago*

    This is one of the reasons I refuse to use self checkout if there is any other option.

    And yes, going to another store is an option I've used before.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›