[–] 5 points 6 hours ago* (1 child)

Also the evangelists support Israel so hard, but as Christians, could never claim right of return, as citizens of Israel. Only Jews and atheists are permitted to do that.

You miss the point of their support. They don't give the slightest fuck about Jews as people or Israel as a country. They just know Revelations said that the Rapture can't start until after the Jews return to the Holy Land, so they'll do whatever it takes to fulfill that condition. It is entirely selfish.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    I'm sorry. But you were not paying attention to Florida and Nixon if you think there wasn't a deliberate bias against a black woman and DSA member. They abandoned her because they did not want her to win. They did not want an example of a leftist winning in the South.

    FTFY. The bias is entirely against leftists, not black women. The Democratic Party is perfectly happy to support a black woman, iff she's a centrist/liberal.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Orders for what one official called a “national no enforcement day” began circulating on Monday inside U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement.

    Handed down through ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations division through internal group chats and verbal commands, the directive called for a halt to all immigration enforcement operations on Election Day, according to ICE officials across the country who spoke to The Intercept.

    “We were told all operations are canceled for Election Day.”

    “We were told all operations are canceled for Election Day,” said one ICE immigration official, who operates in the south and requested anonymity to protect their livelihood. “Word of mouth from our first-line supervisors, no official email notice.”

    According to multiple ICE officials who spoke to The Intercept, the orders were handed down quietly to avoid media attention.

    “Yesterday was the least amount of activity observed from ICE ERO throughout the entire year so far,” said Sherman Austin, the creator of StopICE.net, a crowdsourced platform tracking reported ICE activity across the United States. “You can kind of tell like from the morning. Usually, ICE gets started really early, and there’s a huge spike in activity between 5 a.m. and 10 a.m. That spike wasn’t there on Election Day.”

    Another ICE official, who works in the Great Lakes region, confirmed the orders ahead of Election Day, referring to it as “National No Enforcement Day.”

    [

    Related

    Inside ICE, Officials Question String of Trump Admin “Midterm Panic Moves”](https://theintercept.com/2026/10/15/ice-omar-raid-midterms-political/)

    “We were told to do ‘admin’ shit,” the official said. They said that ICE deportation officers who regularly do street-level operations were diverted to administrative office work: “I’ll be drinking coffee at the office for the first time in a year.”

    In total, ICE officials working in four areas of responsibility — ICE’s jurisdictional regions — coving parts of the northeastern, midwestern, northern, and south-central U.S. regions told The Intercept that they had received orders to stand down on Election Day.

    “Something Unusual Was Going On”

    StopICE, the tracking website, which has roughly half a million subscribers, did record some ICE activity on Election Day, according to Austin, although most of the reports stemmed from sightings unrelated to any immigration enforcement activities.

    [

    Related

    “Offensive Driving”: ICE’s Deadly Weaponization of Vehicles Against Civilians](https://theintercept.com/2026/11/02/ice-vehicles-cars-hit-weapon/)

    “There were a few reports that came in about ICE being at usual spots like the jails,” Austin said, “or seen driving in certain areas in in the city, but it wasn’t the same type of activity that’s usually seen on the site. It was pretty clear that something unusual was going on.”

    AntiFreeze, another crowdsourced ICE-tracking platform that allows users to report and receive real-time alerts about ICE raids, also saw abnormally low levels of ICE activity on November 3, according to Josh, the creator and developer behind the site, who requested to keep his last name anonymous.

    “On Election Day, our network only logged about 56 reported ICE sightings nationwide, which is one of the quietest Tuesdays we’ve ever seen,” Josh said. “We did get about three sightings that did report ICE activity near polling stations, but most of the reports were observations of vehicles associated with ICE. We barely got any reports about actual ICE arrests yesterday.”

    Local activists also observed a low level of ICE activity on the street level.

    “There was no evidence of street abductions,” said an activist working with the rapid-response network in Minnesota’s Twin Cities.

    [

    Related

    In California’s Central Valley, ICE Swung a Red District Blue](https://theintercept.com/2026/11/04/villegas-valadao-california-election-ice/)

    “ICE, in some capacity, was still out and about, but we did not see any reports of off-the-street detainments by ICE or attempts at detainments,” said the activist, who said they got word of ICE arrests at jails, but not targeted operations among the general public. “There were a lot of folks, probably more than usual, observing, and so I think we can be pretty confident that this wasn’t due to lack of observation.”

    Leo Martinez, who volunteers with VC Defensa in Southern California, told The Intercept that no one in his rapid-response group reported any sightings of ICE activity on Tuesday.

    It is still unclear exactly where the orders to halt immigration enforcement operations on Election Day originated from, although some ICE officials believe the orders stemmed from ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations leadership — and not directly from the White House.

    “Nobody from the SDDO level” — a reference to Supervisory Detention and Deportation Officer, part of ICE’s upper management — “expected it to happen until the very last moment,” said another ICE official familiar with the matter. “But I think some of us caught on that senior leadership was making this call with fears of us being at the polls.”

    The official said, “It’s crazy that The White House didn’t catch on.”

    The post ICE Was Secretly Ordered to Stop All Immigration Raids on Election Day appeared first on The Intercept.


    From The Intercept via This RSS Feed.

     

    Progressive Leader Defeats Flavio Bolsonaro in Runoff, Blunting Washington’s Push for Regional Allies.

    On Sunday, the unexpected reelection of Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva represents a setback for U.S. President Donald Trump’s plans to consolidate his influence in Latin America, at a time when the rightward shift of several countries seemed to be clearing his path.

    RELATED:

    Trump’s Grip on Senate at Stake in 10 Key Midterm Races

    The Workers’ Party leader prevailed with nearly 52% of the vote over far-right Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, son of former President Jair Bolsonaro (2019-2022), and became the first candidate to win a runoff after finishing second in the first round.

    As Trump has yet to comment on the results, which Flavio has refused to recognize, Lula’s victory frustrates the possibility that Washington could add Latin America’s largest economy to its bloc of regional allies.

    The setback for the MAGA leader comes just days before midterm elections in which polls indicate Democrats could wrest control of Congress from him.

    A Limit on Regional Momentum

    In his second term, Trump announced he would revive the Monroe Doctrine, a 19th-century policy he invokes to assert U.S. primacy in Latin America.

    When he returned to the White House, his regional allies were few, among them Javier Milei in Argentina, Nayib Bukele in El Salvador, and Daniel Noboa in Ecuador.

    Rightward shifts in Honduras (Nasry Asfura), Bolivia (Rodrigo Paz), Chile (Jose Antonio Kast), Peru (Keiko Fujimori), and Colombia (Abelardo de la Espriella) broadened that bloc. On repeated occasions, Trump boasted of having contributed to those victories.

    The axis of Trump’s foreign policy toward Latin America is the “Shield of the Americas,” an alliance supposedly aimed at fighting drug trafficking but which in reality seeks to consolidate U.S. hegemony. Flavio Bolsonaro had promised to join that new U.S. geopolitical instrument.

    Washington also seeks to counter China’s growing influence in Latin America, although a Flavio victory would hardly have altered Brazil’s economic ties with the Asian giant, given the weight of the agro-industrial sector in the Bolsonarist coalition and its dependence on the Chinese market.

    Currently, Lula’s presidency in Brazil and Claudia Sheinbaum’s presidency in Mexico emerge as the main counterweights to Trump’s domination project.

    This story is extremely important:

    A whistleblower revealed that Brazil's far-right Bolsonaro family dynasty met with Meta to discuss US plans to interfere in Brazil's election, to prevent Lula from winning.

    Lula's Facebook and Instagram accounts were censored a few days before… pic.twitter.com/lB8pkvssqY

    — Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) October 15, 2026

    A Calculated Caution

    Despite what was at stake in Brazil, Trump avoided expressly supporting Flavio Bolsonaro, unlike what happened in Colombia, where he openly backed De la Espriella. His presence, however, was felt, and Lula’s campaign denounced interference from Washington.

    Lula himself declared in his victory speech that the result demonstrates that in Brazil “we do not accept being anyone’s backyard.”

    A Flavio victory would have meant “100 percent alignment with Trump in his culture war and security policy,” explained Benjamin Gedan, director of the Latin America Program at the Stimson Center think tank.

    The Republican was “clearly excited about this possibility,” but an explicit endorsement could have “hurt” the candidate, he added.

    Trump, however, had already taken a stand through his actions. In 2025, his administration imposed high tariffs on Brazil in response to the trial against Jair Bolsonaro, who was sentenced to prison for attempting a coup d’etat against Lula in 2023.

    In May, Trump received presidential candidate Flavio Bolsonaro in the Oval Office, an unusual gesture since he was not a head of state. Flavio asked him to designate the First Capital Command (PCC) and the Red Command as terrorist organizations.

    The White House agreed to that request four days later, a decision Lula opposed out of fear that the measure would open the door to U.S. interventionism.

    Washington also opened a trade investigation against Brazil over alleged unfair practices, revoked the visa of the Brazilian ambassador and suspended its consular services two days before the first round — in which Bolsonaro defeated Lula — citing security reasons.

    That involvement also exposes Washington to the region’s political changes. For Oliver Stuenkel, a researcher at the Carnegie center, ideological alliances are a fragile bet in a scenario marked by frequent alternations in power.

    “The kind of ideological interventionism that the Trump administration is carrying out in the region is counterproductive. In the medium and long term, it will strengthen anti-American forces,” he said.

    Lula’s reelection thus forces Washington to deal with a Brazil that does not share its agenda and highlights the limits of its strategy for Latin America.

    teleSUR/ JF

    Source: EFE


    From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

     

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/53084848

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/53084670

    Today Doug Ford will attack Toronto's autonomy, and choice for safe streets. As well as our right to choose how we get around our city, and to do so without getting hurt or risking our own safety.

    Get ready Ford. There are FAR more cyclists now compared to 2012.

    Oct 13. Tom Riley Park Parking Lot. 5pm-late. Bring food, water and layers.

    Be prepared to arrive earlier in case crews try to do a sneak attack removing protect lanes and infrastructure.

    This fight is more than just about bike lanes.

    It's about demanding municipal governments be respected, and fighting an authoritarian who believes he can do anything against a city's own wishes.

    This is your Dutch moment Toronto!

    Show up to show your support!

     

    Since the explosion in generative AI, there has been a rash of "decompilations" of video games and various other software (such as this example from earlier today disputed -- see below) that have been published to Github and advertised as "Open Source." That claim is a lie.

    The phrase "Open Source" has a specific meaning (and similarly for "Free Software," by the way^1^), and it isn't merely that the source code is there for you to look at. It means that the copyright holder is explicitly giving you permission to read that source code, modify it, redistribute it, etc. Without that element of permission, the code cannot be "Open Source" even if you can physically read it. At best, it might be "Fair Use" depending on the circumstances, but it's most likely just a fancy means of copyright infringement.

    Remember, copyright is a legal construct, not a technical one. It depends much more on the intent of the human doing the copying than it does on the technical details of what they actually did. If the thing they have is obviously intended to be a copy of something else, it is a Derivative Work no matter what technical means were used to create it. That means the original copyright still attaches to it and the person who made the copy doesn't get to choose a new license for it, "Open Source" or otherwise.

    Why YSK:

    You don't have to like the way copyright law works -- I sure don't! -- but you do have to understand it because there's a lot of misinformation going around right now with people claiming things are "Open Source" when they aren't and a lot of people are going to get in trouble for it. It also dilutes the public understanding of what actual legitimate Open Source software is, which is a problem in and of itself.

    Conflating real Open Source software with proprietary software that's been 'pirated with extra steps' is harmful both for developers of the former, who have their reputations damaged by association, and for users/sharers of the latter, who might be misled into not taking the same precautions that they would if they understood that they were dealing with warez. Just because you might think Big Tech can get away with laundering copyright through LLMs -- and even that remains to be seen -- doesn't mean the little guys can.

    TL;DR: Proprietary software cannot become Open Source software by any means except (a) the express consent of the copyright holder or (b) the copyright expiring and the work becoming Public Domain. Whatever technological end-run you think you have around this legal fact, no you don't.


    EDIT: dispute over example

    In giving that example I was relying on the claim in the linked thread, which comes from this guy on BlueSky. Seems like a lot of people think he's wrong, so maybe that's not a good example after all.

    However, there are also things like this, and those are examples I feel very confident in citing because (a) they explicitly call them "decompliations," (b) at least one of them has a LICENSE file that says it's MIT, and (c) there's zero chance Nintendo or Rare or anyone else legitimately gave them permission for it.


    footnote


    ^1^ "Free Software" has essentially the same denotation as "Open Source" -- close enough that every "Free Software" license is also "Open Source" and vice-versa -- but a different connotation. The term "Free Software" tends to get used by people who wish to emphasize the rights of the end-user, while the term "Open Source" tends to get used by people who wish to emphasize that the software is available to be modified.

    view more: next ›