Du kan læse i statistikker lige præcist hvad du vil, jeg mener også at NATO landene er årsagen til at krigen stadig er i gang. Da vores ubrugelige mængder af rødt tape er årsagen til at Ukraine ikke kunne have gjort rigtigt ondt på Rusland ca 9 måneder inde i krigen og frem. Samt mængden af materiel der tog ukueligt langt tid om at nå frem.

Så hvis du vil være based, kunne vi ud fra den snippet konkluderer at 35,7% af Montenegrinerne er based as hell.

Men når du zoomer ud til historiske kontekster og Jugoslavien som helhed, så er det ikke nogen overraskelse at forskellige ideer tolereres og findes.

Montenegro har alle de fundamentale forudsætninger skrevet ind i EUs reglement, lavere korruption end flere EU lande, bruger allerede euroen, stabil økonomi (med Tyrkiet som en kæmpe samarbejdspartner), der er visa-fri indrejse, det er et sundt demokrati - Hvor du muligvis er uenige med dele af deres befolkning, men jeg er også uenig med de efterhånden 40% af Tyskland der stemmer AFD. Skal tysken også ud? Eller hvor går grænsen?

If you want women only housing, you say that. If you want female only housing, you say that.

Although none of them would ever refer exclusively to AFAB.

Women only, would refer to anyone considering themselves a woman (non binary not included)

Female only, would refer to anyone legally considered a female (I believe most countries have a signature in the SSN - I'm aware the US don't, but it's still an internal field registered somewhere)

But in the above case we're talking about a trans person, whom isn't transitioning in a physical/biological aspect. Hence they're a man, but their physicality is female.

They'd be best served the care you'd give other females. Rather than what you'd aim at males.

So a trans man, being fully biological female ends on ER. The personnel shouldn't refer to them as female and instead give them the treatment intended for males?

It's about precision and safety to use a correct language in the correct contexts. When talking to the patient, they should obviously not call them a woman or utilise a dead name. But that's a social context. Not a medical biological relevant one

Why can I not refer to my male friends as bitches?

Men can be male or female.

Women can be male or female.

Nonbinary people fan be male or female.

(Okay there's also a category of intersex)

One is a social gender, one is a physical sex. There's a big difference, let's take a transgender man. Whom is a female and do not intend to transition. They'll largely appear and act like most men do, but they'll be female. Them being female only matters in a few contexts.

But man is not equal male. Far from it.

Statistics does also often have reasons to utilise male and female, rather than man or woman. If their sample size is large enough, then further categorisation might make sense, but ultimately it depends on what the statistics are about and whether it's related to biological features (male/female) or social features (man/woman/non-binary)

Der er også noget survivorship bias ved at være natteravn.

Dem der bliver meget længe, er også ofte dem der er mest fulde

Goal is not surveillance tooling, it's autonomous weapons

It's a cold war nobody dares talking about, because they're aware the technology they're developing to enact a new status quo will make consumer grade equipment more than capable of killing and thus have created a heightened risk of lone wolf and small terror cell attacks. Which is going to be their argument for needing to track everything online, it's a multilayered shit sandwich

Caesar was so synonymous with emperor, they had to change the pronunciation of a letter to differentiate Caesar and Kaiser

Half of those are due to cultural differences.

EVs, Americans wants big shiny difficult to build thing. Chinese wants small, simple, effective car.

Hence American EVs started with big stationwagons, while Chinese EVs began with small hatchbacks. Then they built the larger models after, ontop of the knowledge from the smaller builts.

Solar power, American power grids always favoured reliable production output and never had a boner on for renewables due to the peak and no production cycles. And arguably, the reason everyone is talking about renewables again is due to improvement within battery tech, which positions China nicely due to their willingness to exploit rare earth materials