[–] 7 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

That only works for Republicans because it takes virtually no effort to flail around breaking shit but an immense amount of effort to build something worthwhile.

Also, dems still have little power to enact change without the presidency. Not that they have no power, but don't expect a bunch of new laws or reversed executive orders within the next two years. The biggest win is Republicans' ability to continue breaking shit is now greatly diminished.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago

    Those commercials where Muse is autonomously rescheduling flights, baby sitters, etc... While the user unknowingly relaxes nearby are insane. Who would ever want that?

    These execs are so out of touch. They have human personal assistants wipe their ass for them and think everyone else wants their phones to do the same.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    There is an interstate pact that has 82% of electoral college votes required to subvert the electoral college and elect the president via a national popular vote. With the blue tsunami this week, it could in theory reach 100%, in which case the odds of the US ever having a Republican president again drop significantly since the majority of recent Republican presidental wins have actually lost the popular vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 11 points 2 days ago

    That's quite the auto balance. If Texas stays blu, it's game over for red.

    That's an understatement, even. The top states for electoral college vote counts goes: CA 54, TX 40, FL 30, NY 28, and the rest with less than 20 each, most with less than 10. If Texas stays Blu, Red very well may never win again.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 child)

    Eh, stock comp is real comp. They can't sell it at the moment, but if the $2T IPO is anywhere near a success, they'll make absolute bank.

    More companies, especially startups, should do stock based comp. It gives the employees a vested interest in the conpany and a share in the success. When the owners cash out, the employees get at least a small windfall too. Normally, the employees just get a worse work environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child)

    They don't have to buy their own stock on the market. They can just not sell it in the first place.

    If the stock drops in price, the value of the stock they owe will also drop in price. So, in that scenario they will not have $900B of commitments. But it's the same amount of stock.

    If I own 10 apples and owe you 5, it doesn't matter if tomorrow apples cost $50 Trillion then 50 cents the next. I still owe you 5 apples either way, and I have plenty of apples to cover that debt to you regardless of how much the grocery store is selling them for.

    Side note: plenty of IPOs are terrible investments a lose everyone money. They are risky investments.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

    No, it's not real money. In this case, convertable notes are loans backed by stock. That's why the debt is valued so highly. The notes are still for the same amount of stock, but the value of that stock is inflated beyond reason. Either way, Anthropic is not on the hook for the cash value of the stock, just the stock itself.

    This debt is essentially noting that Anthropic does not own all of this stock on their books, but converting it into cash-value to do so. If someone were to buy the company, like via an IPO, it would be important for them to understand how much of the comapny's valuation is actually owned by the company vs other entities.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 44 points 4 days ago

    It's long been proven that LLMs can produce exact copies of their training data. Not every piece of training data, of course, but enough where spitting out exact replicas of proprietary code is a legitimate concern. Not to mention that copies don't need to be exact in order to be a problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    PieFed allows you to specity CSS in your settings so you can make it look however you like. What CSS do you use to improve your experience?

    I whipped up some today to make the PWA better (for me) on mobile. It moves the post and comment action buttons to the right side, where your hand is (sorry lefties), puts the title below the preview for image/video posts, and makes previews full-width on mobile. Pretty minor, but it makes a big impact to me.

    .post_utilities_bar .pull-right,  
    .comment_actions .pull-right {  
      margin: 0;  
    }  
    
    .post_utilities_bar .voting_buttons_new,  
    .comment_actions .voting_buttons_new {  
      order: -1;  
    }  
    
    .post_utilities_bar,  
    .comment .comment_actions  {  
      justify-content: right !important;  
      flex-direction: row-reverse;  
    }  
    
    @media only screen and (max-width:990px) {  
      .post_teaser_image_preview,  
      .post_teaser_video_preview {  
        position: relative;  
        right: 13px;  
        width: 100vw;  
      }  
    
      .post_teaser_image_preview a,  
      .post_teaser_video_preview div {  
        border: none;  
        border-radius: 0;  
        max-width: 100vw;  
        max-height: 100vh;  
      }  
    
      .post_teaser_video_preview p {  
        margin-bottom: 0;  
      }  
    
      .post_teaser_body:has(.post_teaser_image_preview, .post_teaser_video_preview) {  
        display: flex;  
        flex-direction: column;  
      }  
    
      .post_teaser_body .post_teaser_image_preview,  
      .post_teaser_body .post_teaser_video_preview {  
        order: -1;  
      }  
    }  
    

    A screenshot of the frontpage of PieFed with the above css added in

    Sidenote, I think the css feature might be doing some xml encoding or something because > doesn't seem to work in selectors. I didn't mess around enough to prove that definitively.

    view more: next ›