[–] -4 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

because it works perfectly fine if you're not a helpless moron, that's why.

lots of people start their careers through temp job training programs and become permanent hires.

i'm not dumb and niave enough to be lemmy brained to think government programs are inherently flawness and wonderful and private/semi public programs are evil and terrible.

i have what they call 'real life experience' in these matters. instead of being a keyboard warrior who types in all caps and insults people as if this is in anyway helpful of knowledgeable about the world and how it works.

but hey man, it's easy to dwell in ignorance and rage at the world than... make use of resources that are readily available to you to improve your life. including the countless free ones on the internet that are both public and private...

clearly the 'answer' to problems like this is to daydream about a socialist/communist utopia and be angry it doesn't exist and also wish violence upon those who point out to you that it's never going to exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    reaching by calling it 'multidimensional' when the entire article is two dimensional classifications. that's how. the headline is shit.

    placement of your gonads or breasts has nothing to do with how male or female you are. what are you talking about? some men develop breasts due to cancer, doesn't change them to become women, they are just men whose breasts developed due to hormonal triggers that are not normally present.

    like, I understand the motivation to normalize intersex people by claiming everyone is intersex, but that's not a useful in any way, it's just trivializing things.

    I'm more than open to have hormonal cutoffs for sex/gender definitions, but I also understand that is a total other bag of worms once you start doing things that way. It would a more properly scientific way to define male and female, but socially people would lose their fucking minds if that standard was applied to sports or other social controversial areas where sex definition is a sorting mechanism.

    We already exclude people based on drug use for tons of things like jobs, sports, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

    The author is really reaching here.

    Defines everything as male or female, then wants to argue that everyone is unique or something... this is pretty trivial truth stuff.

    Nobody conforms in reality to any gender ideal, but the ideal of trying do is what motivates a lot of people's social behaviors and expectations for themselves and others. That's why they are ideals. Also why gender identity is so fraught with conflict, because everyone is chasing after some ideal and demanding others do the same as them, often in the context of making themselves sexually appealing.

    Biology doesn't have ideals, just traits. And the traits that matter are those that allow you to reproduce. and yeah, in some cultures being more androgynous would be advantageous, in others, not so much. it's all variable.

    none of this disputes the fact the vast majority of human beings are male or female biologically. and there a subset that are not.

    I will never understand this weird fascination that there has to be two sexes absolutely, or none at all. There are two sexes for the vast majority of species, but not all. Some species can change sex, some can't, some are hermaphrodites, some can produce asexually and sexually, etc.

  • source
  • [+] -13 points 2 months ago* (7 children)

    this already exists, it's called temp agency employment. no, the government doesn't run it.

    baffles me how little real world experience a lot of you people have. at least every other day on here I see someone spectulate abotu this 'great thing that should exist' and it already does.

    also a ton of bigger public libraries offer these types of services/classes for free. including basic computer job skills and such...

    but you'd have to actually... look it up and leave your house to do any of this.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    dude, lucky you don't live where i live because... they act like that in person where i live. and yeah nobody punches them. they encourage them for being 'brave'. and if you be like 'yeah maybe it's not that bad' they scream in your face.

    where i live there really isn't much of a barrier anymore between keyboard tantrums and real life ones... which is precisely why I don't go out less and less. at least once a week I have to watch someone have a tantrum or be really nasty to someone else and it's almost always the same types of comments and reactions as you see on the internet.

    it's incredibly cringe. and nobody pushes back because... other people agree with the shitty awful insane entitled crap people pull.

    Like i can't even go read a book in a cafe anymore without some insane weirdo being all offended at me. I used to do it like on an almost daily basis and nobody ever bothered me other than to maybe ask me if i liked the book... now they come up to me unprompted and tell me how what I'm reading is racist/sexist/evil because it's... classic lit from the 19th century and I am 'spreading' evil by reading these book sin public... it's strait up 'evil spirits' medieval type shit, except I'm the witch.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    I used to have this... then the woke nutbags came along and decided all that mattered about you was your minor disagreements and you were a demonic evil person. I miss those days.

    in real life. but i live in a 'progressive' city full of people who have very reactionary attitudes. 10 years ago nobody cared about these things, and now it's like all they razor focus on and they are super presumptive of.

    i literally went out to a place last night i used to hang out at with some friends.... and the stereotypical woke person came up to me and told me I was 'being problematic by taking up the corner' or something, and I was like 'yeah I'm trying to just do my thing here and not bother anyone' and then they proceeded to tell me how i had to move because i was making them uncomfortable by doing my own thing and it bothered them. I rolled my eyes and they went away and I just decided to leave because it's like... I get it you don't want me to be here because I'm don't look like you and it upsets you, even if I am literally just chilling and being nice. but since I take care of myself and am comfortable being quiet and chilling, i'm a 'threat' now.

    and way too many of my old friends have become that person... the 'concerned' person who thinks me eating a tuna fish sandwich means I'm now a 'bad person'. It's like, why bother interacting with you at all ever? all they live for is being miserable and whiny and blaming other people for their feelings.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    I lost my cat about half a year ago. Finally decided to start looking for a new cat and I spend this past weekend visiting several rescues. There were a lot of cats, mostly kittens, available.

    I was a bit taken aback at the aggressiveness of some of the staff, who were like pushing and almost arguing with me that i had to have multiple cats and how superior having multiple cat is and it's not responsible to only have one cat. I am really looking for an adult cat, but I'd consider a kitten, but the staff were aggressively insisting I had to take two kittens or a kitten and an adult and didn't really listen to me when I tried to claim my lifestyle isn't really the best for two cats as I travel quite a bit and I can only travel with one cat, they kind of them went sour grapes on me. It was really jarring and off-putting.

    Anyway, least to say I didn't really get any one on one time with any cat I was interested in and I walked away disappointed. I put my application in anyway, and now I'm getting voicemails and texts again like pleading for me to take 2-3 kittens or bonded adult pairs. When i reply I'm not looking for a kitten and I already have a dog who would be more than happy to play and be friends with a single cat, they just kind of come back at me insisting no you need two cats. This is across five different shelters this same kind of thing happened.

    Is this a new thing? I have adopted cats before and never had I had this experience. Both times I adopted before it was far more laid back and the rescue staff were far less pushy, and I ended up adopted an single adult cat who were surrender for behavior issues I was able to rectify after a few months of focused attention and training, who became amazing animals. This is what I'm looking to do again. I am more than happy to put personal effort in, and it is weird to me the staff are like insisting 'two cats is easier than one'. I don't want easy. I don't see why that is problematic?

    Are the shelters just like desperate to get rid of animals now and bullying potential adopters? Or is this another kind of trend like raw dog food, that rescue folks insist on pushing on new prospective pet owners? I had to deal when I adopted my dog a few years ago, there were some dog rescues who were like insisting you had to go on a raw dog food diet and it was... weird and offputting. Nobody was insisting you had to adopt two animals or a puppy or anything.

    I will even say I have adopted from two of these rescues before, but I also applied to some new ones who seemed to have some cats who fit my needs, but they all actively steered me away from the cats i asked about and were pushing kittens or adults pairs on me that I had not inquired about.

    Would having a dog already in my home also be why they are kinda pushing kittens on me? I understand that might be easier to integrate, but I kinda know what I'm looking for and have introduce animals before very successfully.

    view more: next ›