all 67 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 27 points 7 months ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The ultra rare three day special woman operation

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I prefer asymmetrical women.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 7 months ago

    Women on drugs.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    this use of the term "biological" is stupid

    hrt and surgery are both most certainly "biological"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    Straight and gay people still feel atracted to those with specific sexual traits, whether natural or artificially developed, so the description is still important for dating. Some people dont care much about gender, but still consider sex important. And of course physicians are rarely interested in gender either when diagnosing medical conditions. What concerns them is biology. So just because transphobes misuse terms to justify discrimination, that doesnt render those terms invalid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    A professional wouldn't actually use the term biological woman though because it's a made up right wing dog whistle and not a real medical term.

    Also for like 99%+ of things your physician knowing your agab is completely irrelevant. Hormones change so much stuff like metabolism, bone density, blood proteins, etc so they really don't need to know at all unless you need to see someone for reproductive system specific problems.

    Also, transgender people are not abiotic, or fake, or mechanical or whatever. Trans women are biological women and trans men are biological men. Describing someone as biological whatever is really dumb because all humans are biological so it's a completely redundant term.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago*

    Humans are all biological but there is an important distinction between sex and gender that i refuse to conflate, as that would be pseudoscientific. Both contribute to what is considered male/female, but one is biological/sexual, and the other is social/cultural. and yes, transwomen can be considered biological woman as well, although this cannot be an exact term, just like gender isnt. So you will never be able to say a person is exclusively one or the other. its just that some aspects of who they are are definitely biological, and some definitely arent. This is not made up. Also the sex you are identified as you are born is not the only factor for treatment. Physicians will definitelly want to know your hormone configuration has been changed because it affects body function in many ways, ultimately changing your sex.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    I think it actually implies the existence of mechanical women, aerodynamic women, thermodynamic women, ceramic women and computer women.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 44 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    Not to be "that guy" but I think they are mixing their metaphors here. "Biological weapon" is the comparison they're making, not "biological war" which isn't something I think exists,

    So examples like "chemical woman", "woman of mass destruction" work, whereas "total woman" or "guerrilla woman" do not.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    I was thinking "biological warfare". Which still doesn't fit all the references, but I'll write it off as "artistic liberty"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I assumed it was "warfare," and for that every example works

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I've studied womanfare on the frontlines. I can tell you that women never change.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I’d identify as a ballistic woman.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago*

    One Two Three Four

    I declare a thumb Woman

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • Women of conquest.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    There needs to be more women of mass destruction.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Ranged Women and Martial Women too

  • source
  • the only time that the concept of "biological woman" matters is when you want to make children. every other time it just plainly doesn't matter.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    Pyrrhic women?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago*

    Most of the women I've encountered in life seem to be engaged in a long-term siege. No breeching those walls.

    BTW, they won't respond to slapping them with your "cannon balls." Just saving you the futile attempt.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    What about maneuver women and women of attrition?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    There's also trade women, and economic women for less destructive solutions.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    "Action Stations! Threat priority Anti-Air Women Red!"

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Cyber women.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    What of the Mother Of All Women??

  • source
  • Also missing: unitary women and cluster women

  • source
  • [+] 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    "biological man" and "biological woman" are just a transphobic dogwhistle and misgendering with extra steps

    if you're on HRT your body works largely the same way a cis person with the same hormones would

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    My wife checks most of those boxes. Now I can't tell if I have a thing....

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Woman of mass destruction

    Ah, these are rather common. Divorces are their weapon of choice.

    More often than not, the man has his post-alimony earnings and net worth rolled back twenty years or more. Most never return to their prior economic level unless they’re young enough to compensate, and then they remain severely behind their peers, as well. Only the truly wealthy men - think $10M of net worth or more, and $250k+ earnings - can bounce back from a divorce like it’s nothing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment