top 95 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 59 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Americans: we can go dumber

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    We'd probably be better off if we elected a golden retriever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 8 months ago* (9 children)

    Guilty as charged.

    I recall squirming in embarrassed discomfort listening to Bush try to form a coherent sentence.

    GLORY DAYS

    In 2001, I was one of the few against the Iraq war, and we were pariahs. Flags flying everywhere

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    i remember living in redhatistan in 2003. it was halloween. i thought of the thing that would be scariest to my neighbors so i dressed up as an iraq war protestor. most of my neighbors immediately got it and thought it was hilarious. about 15% of them were insanely offended and two or three grown men squared up to fight me until they realized the puny disabled kid had this long board with nails in it holding a small sign. i was not unprepared in any way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    I went to a Halloween party in 2004 dressed as an Abu Ghreb detaineee. I was basically naked with flesh-colored compression shorts that had a stuffed dog biting the crotch, a black hood, chains and a leash attached to my wrists, and "property of Abu Ghreb" written on my chest. Absolutely nobody got it (this was also in the South, in a Louisiana town with a big air force base, so it's probably best that it wasn't understood).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago

    I got garbage thrown at me in school and I was the one called to the the office over it. I didn't even have a complex opinion on the war. I was just creeped out by jingoism and I wanted to distance myself from it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago

    I remember in those days I was watching CNN and there was a split screen, one side was a photo of Bush, the other side was a photo of Saddam. I remember thinking "I honestly don't know who scares me more." I had absolutely no idea how bad things could get. I wish we were back to the relative sanity of those days.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 85 points 8 months ago (14 children)

    There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago* (8 children)

    The rumor i heard is he might not have wanted to have an audio clip of himself saying "shame on me" that could have been used in any other context. But yeah he made himself look like an absolute twat that way. Not the best fast thinker.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah, Bush was very much faking his dumb hick persona. He needed to offset his Yale and Harvard education to his target demographic. He bought his Texas ranch right before running for office.

    The current GOP is a caricature of what he was doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 8 months ago (21 children)

    Bush had a 90% approval rating following the attack on the twin towers. Americans were not surprised by the "war on terror", they did not resist it, they were cheering for it.

    It was only later once people realised there was no obtainable goal in sight, and no exit plan. That they started questioning it. But the was years later.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    In fairness, Bush's rating declined steadily after 9/11, and was in the mid 50s when he asked Congress for a formal declaration of war in Iraq.

    And that makes sense - Americans rallied in the days following the attack. Bush played his role perfectly. He was very presidential after 9/11. He was serious. Somber. He mourned and offered consolation. He was dignified.

    The Trump administration missed a crucial step in starting a war. He forgot that Americans hate wars of choice - and especially when the gas prices are affected.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (19 children)

    The attack left an emotional impact that could be manipulated to brainwash support. Today's brainwashing techniques require a lot less, are more effective, and attack people's egos directly through group psychology and cults-on-demands of the engagement algorithm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (18 children)

    There was no brainwashing... Americans were angry and wanted someone to pay. Who exactly didn't matter. As long as someone paid.

    As of now. There's no brainwashing. People are not supporting Trump because they don't know better. They're doing because they agree with him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (11 children)

    Straight from the horse's mouth: https://www.military.com/feature/2025/11/16/long-arc-of-influence-how-modern-governments-build-and-weaponize-propaganda.html

    How naive can you be? Like literally, after things like Cambridge Analytica, technobro billionaire oligarchs openly buying up social networks and openly admitting that without them, their candidates would have lost elections, like after a gazillion stories about troll factories, bots, users being sold on the market because of their relevance in the platform due to reputation gaming, literally f-ing Project 2025 and the rise of technocracy zealots in power, wealth, and influence, how utterly naive is it openly acceptable to consider someone as being while believing they are a participating in good faith?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    I never said you can't influence anyone through propaganda. But I do not believe Americans were "brainwashed" to do anything. I think they wanted to do it.

    I don't think they're brainwashed, I think they're genuinely that dumb and uneducated.

    In any other civilised country, if the government started a war without congressional approval. They would riot in the streets of the capitol and stay there until they get what they want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago* (8 children)

    In any other civilised country, if the government started a war without congressional approval. They would riot in the streets of the capitol

    No, they wouldn't and they haven't. In Europe, this is what's fueling the rise of the far-right. The difference is largely that their forms of government are more resilient. You could not be any more mistaken. There are riots in Europe, just like there are in the US, but MAGA is perfectly able to organize riots and protests as well, and so are their fair-right counterparts in the EU, and theirs has much more money behind them and is much more cultified.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    Oh, which European country exactly launched a full scale war against another country without congressional approval?

    I would love to know just how mistaken I am.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago* (6 children)

    You are so mistaken you have to resort to false equivalence and ignore the explicit evidence given to you while you regurgitate a position whose only foundation is based on pure vibes and stereotypes - basically the same thing that fuels MAGA. You will only ever help extend the the distance towards any real solution because rather than address the psychology and the factors pushing for the division, you are yourself contributing to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago* (5 children)

    That is a wonderful word-salad. Incoherent and meaningless.

    If you think your article from "military.com" is explicit evidence, there's nothing more to be said. That's just sad.

    I said if any other civilised country would riot, you claim they would not and have not, and when pressed on that claim, your response is not to back up your claim, but to accuse me of resorting to false equivalence. Sounds like something a certain orange man would do...

    Going to war with forgein nations is what's fueling the right in Europe? You need to put the booze down. First of all, even the far right in most of Europe is still more left leaning than the US left. To compare right wing policies in Europe and US is actually a false equivalence. They're not even close to equal. Some views are shared yes. But that doesn't not equate an entire political standing.

    What is fueling the right in europe, is having to clean up the humanitarian crisis the US have been leaving behind in the middle East for over 20 years.

    The US bomb their homes, demolish their schools, fuels their insurgency, which leads to even more civilian displacement. And where can they go? To the US? Fat chance. There's no way to reach US shores and the US refuses to grant asylum to the millions of people they have displaced through their actions. The only realistic recourse they have is to smuggle themselves into Europe and hope for the best.

    And now... the US is doing it AGAIN. Will they do anything to clean up the mess they're leaving behind? No. Their politicians supporting the ongoing war is adamant that they have no responsibility as to what comes after. They just wanna go in, bomb the shit out of them, and leave. And what does the US people do? Nothing. Too worried about affording the food they need to survive. And god forbid they ever get sick or end up in a medical emergency.

    So sincerely. Fuck off with your bullshit. Americans voted for that idiot twice. They saw first hand what happened the first time, and gladly went in for dessert.

    This is as true in Russia as it is in the US. Propaganda doesn't make people stupid. It's made for stupid people. It's hardly surprising that the divide between Democrats and republicans can be measured by their education. Or lack there of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (4 children)

    That is a wonderful word-salad. Incoherent and meaningless.

    Fine projection, just like a MAGAss.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Yeah, you are unable to properly adress a single point. As expected. Well done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (2 children)

    There was literally no "point" that did not have your opinion as its masterwankory source, or that managed to pertain to the original topic.

    The attack left an emotional impact that could be manipulated to brainwash support. Today’s brainwashing techniques require a lot less, are more effective, and attack people’s egos directly through group psychology and cults-on-demands of the engagement algorithm.

    Your comment was, and I quote, "a wonderful word-salad. Incoherent and meaningless." No, I cannot address a single "point", because if I treated any part of that word spew as a point, then it becomes garbage in, garbage out. But then again, I suspect you are fully aware you are acting like a troll. As I said,

    how utterly naive is it openly acceptable to consider someone as being while believing they are a participating in good faith?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    What you highlighted is not what I called a word-salad, and you know it.

    You're the one that take the discussion away from the topic at hand by trying to involve the "European right". Me responding to it is not failing to pertain to the topic.

    The only one living under a bridge here is you. Good luck with that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    "There was no brainwashing..."

    Define brainwashing. Tell me why a farmer who lives 3,000 miles away from NYC should be emotionally affected by 9/11, but not by the countless other injustices in the world. How else do you define mass media if not "brainwashing"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (4 children)

    Making someone adopt radically different beliefs, often by force or severe systematic pressure.

    Charles Manson would be the classic example of someone that brainwashed vulnerable people into doing things they under normal circumstances would never even consider.

    I cannot tell you why your fictional farmer would or would not be emotionally affected by various tragedies... in my experience, people are different and have their own views. Some are deeply affected by attacks on their nation, some are not.

    I don't think mass media is brainwashing people, because I don't think they're making them adopt new beliefs. I think they're re-affirming and confirming people's already held preconceived notions and prejudice.

    If you think it's brainwashing that's fine. But I would disagree.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (3 children)

    I don’t think mass media is brainwashing people, because I don’t think they’re making them adopt new beliefs.

    And where did those beliefs originate?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Where does any belief originate?

    If you're trying to allude to those beliefs coming from brainwashing. Then we are all brainwashed by our parents.

    But we generally call that "being raised". And as you're well aware, different people are raised differently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    Yes, that's kind of my point. We all are brainwashed, from Day One. You don't have a choice which ideas you're exposed to when you are a child.

    As an adult, though, you can start to exert control over the narrative. You can explore ideas that your parents and school didn't share with you. You can pick up a book, learn what you want to learn, share ideas that were previously off limits.

    Mass media (esp. doom scrolling) attempts to regain control of that narrative. And, yes, of course, mass media's job is to insert new beliefs. Why else would I have an opinion on Israel, a country I've never been to, that has no immediate relevance to my life? Why don't I have a similarly strong opinion about countries like Kiribati or Abkhazia?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    I understand what you're trying to say. I don't necssesarily disagree, I think we just call it different things.

    I'll explain my thoughts like this. All of our beliefs, what we're capable of, is like seeds. When we are raised, our parents, teachers, situations that affect us, plant them. Some we plant ourselves.

    Not all of the seeds will grow. Throughout, our parents, friends, teachers, reward the growth of certain seeds and punish the growth of others. Parents especially might even try to rip out a seedling before it grows bigger.

    you get the idea.

    What I think mass media is doing (radicalisation), is encouraging the growth of seeds already planted but never encouraged to grow. And over a long course of time, the continuous reinforcement have made it grow into a tree. A full blown belief.

    What I think brainwashing is doing, is taking one of those trees, chopping it down, and planting a sapling in its place.

    Upon reflection. I do agree that some people are probably being brainwashed. Their trees have been rotting away and it doesn't take much to fell it.

    But I think most are being radicalised.

    Maybe those words mean the same, maybe I'm just making a distinction on my own. But at least you understand my thought process.

    As to your last question. I think we do care, we just don't know it's happening. When we learn of new situations, we fall back on our forest of beliefs to guide us on how we feel about it. But if we were to care deeply about everything awful, well, I don't think there's enough hours in a year to cover it all before new awful things happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    As long as the dumb man continues to have supporters, we must assume there are still dumber men out there. Watching. Waiting. Eating dirt.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    Isn't this saying US citizen are the dumber man (as a whole) for electing fucking dimwits again and again and again who have war crimes to their names?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    So, voting for war criminals isn't a sign of stupidity per se. Republicans generally like war crimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    The unnamed common republican is the final boss of stupidity

    When i turned 18 and voted in my first election, i knew george w was astoundingly stupid. And i knew even more so every election with trump. But those that vote for them are even worse.

    But lumping all Americans into one box is also dumb

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    They stole that election.

    His daddy is cia.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago

    One of the varieties of voting machine (the ones made by Diebold) in use during that election used Microsoft Access as its database for storage. Only oldheads will understand how horrifying that is. Access did have an audit table (a part of the DB that records all transactions made to the data) but it was hand-editable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    Can't wait to see how stupid the next quarter-century idiot will be

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    I know this is a meme so I shouldn’t look for historic accuracy here but a the vast majority of the US, and many of our allies, were on board for an invasion of the Middle East (Afghanistan) in 2001 after 9/11. It was the invasion of Iraq in 2003 that turned many people off.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Afghanistan is in Southwest Asia, not the middle east, fyi

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago

    Thanks for the info! In the early 20th c. “The Middle East” was defined as the land between India and the Ottoman Empire. The term has since changed to not include Iraq and Afghanistan. During the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the US government used the term “Greater Middle East” to encompass those two countries. That’s where my confusion lies. Learn something new every day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    vast majority in many of our allies

    Not in Spain, it was not. I think the biggest demonstrations ever recorded in Spain to this day are the ones of those days, saying a very clear NO TO WAR. The president still sent the army any fucking way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    the vast majority of the US, and many of our allies, were on board for an invasion of the Middle East (Afghanistan) in 2001 after 9/11.

    Spain did support the US in the war in Afghanistan after 2001. They did not support the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Well yeah, who's the more foolish? The fool or the one that follows him?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    after bush, we had PALIN, we thought she was the worst of the gop.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    If idiocracy has taught me anything, there is a dumber person out there and they shall lead legions of idiots.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I love the idea of a Dumb and Dumber short or reboot with Dubya and Trump, but I can't listen to Trump-speak at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    The south doesn't deserve to vote.

    Suspend their statehood and keep them as permanent territories with zero voting representatives.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    the south has a great many good people in it whose voting access has been stripped from them by criminalization schemes and gerrymandering. you want the south to stop ruining elections? federalize national reforms on voter access and gerry mandering.

    the exploitation of the south isn't initiated by southerners, it's initiated by the bosses and the bankers. basically the solution to the south being a problem is to return to Ulysses S Grant's strategy of prosecuting the KKK and handing out money to poor people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Ok then, so what is the next level of the inferno, Dante.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Don’t worry. We’ll be at war with Cuba too.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    25 comments in c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world view that post
    9 comments in c/noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works view that post