There was literally no "point" that did not have your opinion as its masterwankory source, or that managed to pertain to the original topic.

The attack left an emotional impact that could be manipulated to brainwash support. Today’s brainwashing techniques require a lot less, are more effective, and attack people’s egos directly through group psychology and cults-on-demands of the engagement algorithm.

Your comment was, and I quote, "a wonderful word-salad. Incoherent and meaningless." No, I cannot address a single "point", because if I treated any part of that word spew as a point, then it becomes garbage in, garbage out. But then again, I suspect you are fully aware you are acting like a troll. As I said,

how utterly naive is it openly acceptable to consider someone as being while believing they are a participating in good faith?