The average American now holds onto their smartphone for 29 months, according to a recent survey by Reviews.org, and that cycle is getting longer. The average was around 22 months in 2016.

While squeezing as much life out of your device as possible may save money in the short run, especially amid widespread fears about the strength of the consumer and job market, it might cost the economy in the long run, especially when device hoarding occurs at the level of corporations.

Research released by the Federal Reserve last month concludes that each additional year companies delay upgrading equipment results in a productivity decline of about one-third of a percent, with investment patterns accounting for approximately 55% of productivity gaps between advanced economies. The good news: businesses in the U.S. are generally quicker to reinvest in replacing aging equipment. The Federal Reserve report shows that if European productivity had matched U.S. investment patterns starting in 2000, the productivity gap between the U.S and European economic heavyweights would have been reduced by 29 percent for the U.K., 35 percent for France, and 101% for Germany.

top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 215 points 11 months ago (12 children)

Holy shit keeping a device longer than 2 years is "device hoarding" now? Thats fucking nuts.

How do you invest so much money in a device like that and not make it last? I've got one phone I use for work calls thats 10 years old. People are still shocked I dont even have a case on it.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    My last phone up until a couple months ago was from 2017, apparently I am just a mega hoarder. Don't look at the pile of miscellaneous bits of tech, the Omnisiah demands I collect the shinnies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Honestly, if I could just upgrade the CPU and replace the battery every once in a while, is still be using a Note 3 or nexus 5. Those first few generations of notes were awesome.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    I still miss my Note 3 and Note 5. I'm using the Note 9 now, and even that is starting to become unbearably slow. Thankfully the battery is still good enough for me, but even Firefox constantly freezing is ridiculous

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    ...hands up anyone using laptops or desktops older than 15 years?.. ...right here, bitches...lol...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    I've got a "refurbished" Dell laptop that's about 15yrs old. Some ex-corp model. 4C/8T, 16" 1900x1200-ish display, Nvidia GPU, 20G RAM, and it's still going strong except for the battery which stopped holding a charge. I could get a new battery but I use the system rarely and just for browsing/email so running it off the AC brick is fine. It's been running Linux Mint for as long as I can remember. My phone is a cheapo model from 2021 and it is also fine. The only reason I might replace it is if the battery tanks like with my other phones (planned obsolescence) or if I finally decide it's mandatory to up my security/privacy game and need a phone that runs GrapheneOS, which means a Pixel. An old used one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Yeah, fuck that. I'll keep my device as long as possible because of course I would! Try for five years.

    "Hording"... The fucking nerve to say that... I am actually offended. Whatever happened to "recycle, reduce, reuse"? What could possible be more irresponsible than constantly replacing your devices?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 131 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Maybe don’t base the economy on e-waste?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 106 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    What kind of twatwaffle writes this crap. Fuck your planned obsolescence.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 11 months ago (7 children)

    ...i believe only one country has "planned obsolescence" as an illegal business practice...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Bhutan?

    After a quick search, it seems to be France. I wouldn't have guessed that in a thousand years, judging their car industry...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Lol shots fired.

    Accurate, correct shots...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Good old French engineering. Calculations say we need at least a 9mm bolt to hold on this widget, every other bolt on the car is 10mm or 16mm. 9mm bolt it is.

    There's something weirdly seductive about French cars though, they somehow manage to be extremely good at some specific niche feature and look nice and be just quality enough that you seem to talk yourself round to them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 105 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Sacrifice yourselves for the economy

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 90 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Maybe I’m old but it feels like the days of meaningful improvements have passed. Now it’s just a slightly different design for the sake of the annual release schedule. Why change when this 4 year old device is still supported and functions just fine?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 11 months ago

    This is it, really. I used to upgrade every year or two and flash the latest and greatest ROM to be on the bleeding edge.

    Now, none of that really seems like a huge difference anymore other than GrapheneOS for privacy and security.

    It's just incremental improvements and none of the reparability I want, so I wait until it's really necessary to upgrade now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Mine is now 3.5 years old. I bought a new flagship model with the idea it'd last a long time. Only now are new 'features' and updates coming out on new models, and even those are minor. Plus mine still has company support.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    A new phone can cost over $1000 and the old one still works

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    “6G” will take care of that. The carriers will force you to upgrade and then charge you higher rates because for some reason they have to replace all their infrastructure every few years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    The infra replacement at least makes sense though, the bandwidth they have is limited and consumers want to squeeze more out of it (higher quality video, bigger files, high quality calls) so they need to repurpose the spectrum or use different parts of the spectrum.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 54 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Maybe the economy shouldn’t be so dependent upon disposable devices.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 49 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Yeah, no shit. No one wants to buy a new $1200 phone that does the exact same shit as the last $1200 phone.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Phones peaked around 2012. Now they are more cameras. If they had user replaceable batteries like 20 years ago no one would need to replace them.

    Institutions and businesses need to stop the 2 year cycle on phones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago*

    If they had user replaceable batteries like 20 years ago no one would need to replace them.

    I've only had 1 without a removable battery and decided never again. Can recommend Fairphone, or maybe Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.

    The Fairphone is particularly repairable and more sustainably and ethically produced than pretty much any other phone FWIW. Almost any component can be replaced in minutes, including the screen and camera($106), as well as microphones, speakers, usb ports, etc ($20~40). It uses de-Googled android and has a variety of built in security and privacy features other phones lack. They're a good company trying to improve the industry, so I think more people should be aware of them.

    The Galaxy XCover Pro is the best of the very limited number of removable battery phones from major well known brands, IMO.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 11 months ago

    "The economy" can once again be replaced with "rich people's yacht money"

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 11 months ago

    "The economy" is code for rich people's profits.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 11 months ago

    Then the "economy" should make more repair shops and sell more replacement items if it can't convince people to throw away still useful items anymore.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Sounds like phone companies need to innovate a bit more to me. Why the hell would anyone blame consumers for deciding that they don't need to replace something if the replacement is almost the exact same?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 11 months ago

    It doesn't cost the economy at all; great efficiency frees up resources for other purposes. The only downside is to the companies that make the devices and rely on planned obsolescence for profitability. The stock market and "the economy" are NOT synonyms.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

    I remember in the 00's when you'd upgrade your phone every year because the service providers would give you a new phone. And it would be leaps and bounds better than your previous phone with tons of new features.

    Now, Samsung wants to kvetch because I won't spend $1,500 on their new whatever that is functionally identical to the one I have from 2020? Feh! Rot!

    Edit: Come to think of it, my old phone has more features than the new one since they got rid of the stylus. Maybe one day they'll figure out "AI" isn't a feature, it's bloatware.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Where’s that cartoon about financial news stories making much more sense if you replace the words “the economy” with “rich people’s boat money”?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    This article is framed from a capitalist CEO, and while it touches on reality, feels incredibly lost in it's point.

    Cassandra Cummings, CEO of New Jersey-based electronics design company Thomas Instrumentation. ...

    Both the cellular and internet infrastructure has to operate to be backwards compatible in order to support the older, slower devices. Networks often have to throttle back their speeds in order to accommodate the slowest device

    I'd Boohoo, if they actually were thinking about rebuilding the network stack to consider something like MultiPathTCP and reframed the devices to actually use all the networks they were on rather than a single one... But no they want you to by a single provider and depend on that plan... For the economy.

    Further Telecoms choose not to upgrade towers (to save costs). In 2023, AT&T/Verizon spent $10B less on network upgrades than projected. Because they were being profit-driven underinvestment.

    She does go on to say:

    To ease the transition to new technologies, she says there should be designs that are repairable or modular rather than the constant purge and replace cycles. “So perhaps future devices can have a partial upgrade in say ethernet communications rather than forcing someone to purchase an entirely new computer or device,” Cummings said. “I’m not a fan of the throw-away culture we have these days. It may help the economy to spend more and force upgrades, but does it really help people who are already struggling to pay bills?” she said.

    So slightly redeeming.

    The article also makes note of repairing:

    He adds that when people hold onto their phones or laptops for five or six years, the repair and refurbishment market becomes an active part of the economy. But right now, in both European, American, and global markets, too much of that happens in the shadows.

    But this attempt to point out that productivity is lost on old devices:

    The price to the organization is then paid in lack of productivity, inability to multitask and innovate, and needless, additional hours of work that stack up. Workplace research conducted by Diversified last year found that 24% of employees work late or overtime due to aging technology issues, while 88% of employees report that inadequate workplace technology stifles innovation. Kornweiss says he doesn’t expect there’s been any improvement in those numbers over the past year.

    There’s a disconnect between the numbers and behavior. Many workers report that aging devices stifle productivity, but like a favorite pair of shoes or an old sweater, they don’t want to give them up to learn the intricacies of a new device (which they’ll learn and then have to replace with another). Familiarity can trump productivity for many workers. But the result of that IT clinginess is felt in the bottom line.

    Fails to point out the waste of resources and it's impact on climate, health, and the economy; loss of privacy and it's impact on democracy, health, and yes the economy; and also how often new things don't actually help productivity...

    Some how the "Upgrade to help the economy" falls flat when you consider Windows 11 and it's non-upgrade upgrade. Or MS Office which is still producing Word/Excel/PowerPoint/etc decades later with the same shortcuts. Your ‘productivity lag’ is your boss refusing to train you not your laptop

    I mean if upgrade = economy, why does Apple sit on $165B in cash? They should spend it — not you!

    Profit-driven innovation that wants to sell us the same iPhone with a new camera, is not helping the economy. We need real innovation that disrupts big tech as much as it disrupts everything.

    Oh and that 'business equipment investment' from the fed was about factory robots and large capital investments, not phones.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] -4 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    This comment could have be a vote.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (4 children)

    It was accompanied by a vote, you silly boots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (3 children)

    and contributed nothing more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    What in the good gracious did your comments contribute, guy? Except a bunch of bile into the Internet, wasteland of negativity?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 11 months ago

    Omg the poor economy, how could those selfish Americans do that

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 11 months ago

    Man. What a shitty headline. This is actually impressive.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago

    They already did, that's the problem. If they want more consumer spending they need to fix the wealth gap, but they don't want to do that. They want to keep the pump running that transfers wealth from the poor to the rich but it's starting to stall and they're panicking, hence pieces like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    PEOPLE AREN'T GIVING US MORE MONEY!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago

    Great! Now we're getting blamed for wrecking the economy because we aren't spending enough of our minimum wages on $2000 phones often enough.

    Couldn't have anything to do with redistributing over a trillion dollars a year to Sociopathic Oligarchs, and not taxing them. How about forcing them to give each one of us a new phone every year. Or how about this: Just give us health care, like every other country in the world.

    Not buying enough new phones? Go fuck yourself.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago

    This is a good thing and CNBC centers on the poor shareholders. Reduction of ewaste in this small area is positive.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago

    Maybe "the economy" should give some more money back to working class people, ya dingdongs

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    29 months

    squeezing as much life out of your device as possible

    FUUUUUCK YOUUUUUUU

    Last phone I had for 7 years, through a screen replacement, 2 battery replacements, and a switch to LineageOS.

    And I would not even call that "squeezing as much life out of your device as possible".

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    2 phones ago I kept my phone for 6 years and it became sooo slow I had to upgrade it. Had it wasn’t for that, I’d have kept the phone longer. Last was 7 and I upgraded because someone gave me a newer phone for free. Perhaps it’s just a preference for me to keep devices until they die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Many people use cheap phones and used phones as well sometimes, and buying another one is nearly more interesting than repairing them

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (1 child)

    The phone in question was midrange. Sure, not super cheap and I can see how a cheaper one would make it less attractive to repair, but still. (Plus I paid like, 50€ for the screen repair, I think?), and batteries were 15€ from eBay plus 20 minutes of my time.

    But this is kinda beside the point: as long as it runs your apps, why upgrade.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Some people want faster phones for gaming for example. Maybe more storage. Maybe better photos. Maybe better connectivity. Maybe a bigger screen.

    I’m on your team honestly. If you’re happy with your current phone, don’t buy a new one. Help the planet and save some money :)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago

    Now I want to hold my devices longer so the economy destroys even faster

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    device hoarding

    That is not what this is called.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago

    "A population with skyrocketing costs of living and stagnant wages cutting unnecessary spending, and that's a problem"

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago

    wHy ArE mIlLeNnIaLs DeStRoYiNg ThE pRiCe Of ____?!#1

    Because we don't have any fucking money, idiot.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Proper headline: Economy sucks, inflation is higher than ever, so people have to hold onto their devices longer.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago

    Maybe if more of "the economy" went into the pockets of consumers they'd have money to buy phones as often as they used to.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 11 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 11 months ago

    Ć̶̨̢̧̨̬͍̩̳̦̭̯̘̟̥̭͈̫͈̝̹͙͂͂̽̍̄͆̿̿̀̈̋̓̊̑͊̏͐̿͝͝͝ͅ ̵̨͚̲̯͎̲̻̦̹͚͖̻͗ͅÒ̷̧̰̙̗̭̳̤̲͖̼̬̦͇̊̑͒̋̉̂̈́͜ ̶̨̡̢̹̺͙̠̭̻̩̻̦̲̱̹̜̽̏̈́̄̓̀͊̓̐͒͋̎͝ͅͅN̸̡̨̫͎̤͕͇͓̳̩͍͉͔̙̍̌ͅ ̵̢̳̹̲͕̫̮͙̇͊̐̓̎̿̎̚S̷̨̻̥̯̳̜̞͍͇̥͙͈̯̳̽́̆̈́̽̓̍͌͗̅̽̕͜͝ ̵̢̞͎̝͎̯̤̪͎̞̜̣̭̰̥̞̲͇̊̽̽̋̄̋͘̚͜U̷̢̧̖͓͎̣̰̖̟͍̗̼̭̞̳̣̠͖͈̎͗̒̈̂̍̀͌́̈́̌͛̿̊͜͠ ̵́̄͛̏̏̀͆͐̊̓̈̇̀̈́͌̔̽̾̾͋̓͝͝ͅM̴̢̛̹̙̳̰̩͙̙̦̤̞̦͙̞̦̗̈́̊̌́́̾̅̑͑͋̃͌͆͂̉̍͋͠͠ ̶̨̛̜̭̟̩̝͐̈́̓̄̂͋̓͒̄̽͑͛̑͠Ę̵̢̛͔̦̹͕̬̲̙̼̲͖̣̥͎̆͗͐̚͜ͅͅ

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 45 points 11 months ago*

    They could've also said CEOs are hoarding more wealth than ever and it's costing the economy.

    Also, phone manufacturers, for one, took my headphone jack, removable storage, removable battery, crammed in more crapware, made rooting even harder, and keep aggravating my RSI with bigger and bigger screens. Why the hell would I look forward to an upgrade?

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago

    Fuck this shit. Pay us more.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    29 months?! I don't get rid of my device until it doesn't hold a charge for longer than 10 minutes and no longer has security updates provided...My last phone was 7 years old.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    I'm posting this from a 7 year old device.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    7 year old device gang (Galaxy S9+)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Fuck the economy. It can eat my ass.

    Also with moore's law's death, why the fuck would anybody believe this productivity bullshit? Any device from 5 years ago can do what a device today can.

    One more thing, wtf is this entitlement from electronics importers. Apple, google, samsung, etc can all fuck off until they move manufacturing back to north america.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    109 comments in c/economics@lemmy.world view that post
    11 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    1 comment in c/fark@ibbit.at view that post