top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 212 points 11 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 114 points 11 months ago (8 children)

    If an AI bubble pops, no one is getting out clean.

    He means the taxpayers.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 74 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Privatize the profits, socialize the losses

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago

    “We should privatise service X so it’s more efficient” X collapses “We can’t afford to let X fail despite the fact that it ran at massive profits all the way to it’s collapse so we’ll bail it out” THEN WHAT WAS THE POINT OF PRIVATISING IT IN THE FIRST PLACE?!

    You can take on the burden of running the thing and therefore the cost of making it public, or you can allow it to be private with the caveat that they must pay a substantial (enough for the government to not be at a net loss) tax as a kind of insurance in the event a bailout is needed, but don’t take on the worst of both worlds where the profits are private and the losses are public.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Let the taxpayers prop up failing companies. Corpo welfare is the good kind of welfare even though most of the money gets sucked up by the Executives and share buy backs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    At least China is right about not bailing out their companies when their own property bubble collapsed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    The bar can't be "not as corrupt as America". That's not a bar, that's the ground. They can and should do better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    Wall Street didn't learn from past events and is doomed to repeat history?

    Shocking... /s

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Oh, they learned. We thought them that no one will be accountable and that the greediest will be bailed out and continue to get richer and richer. We are keeping jackals in our house, and we are giving them a pat on the head and a tasty treat every time they bite our children.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 111 points 11 months ago* (3 children)

    Was that a threat?

    And I hope he wasn’t threatening everyone who participates in the global economy.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    you're kidding right?

    those billionaites that gambled the US economy on an executive borwnosing machine will get a bailout paid by those who lost healthcare and can't afford food. 2008 all over again.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    We should improve society somewhat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I believe the French had a nice invention for that. And it’s not the ‘pain au chocolat’…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 child)

    This is a threat. They know that they're using the stock market to fund their greed and that anyone with savings tied up there (Retirement funds that are invested in the market) will be on the hook. Plus the tax payer money they're going to ask for because they're "too big to fail".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago

    I was opposed to the bailouts in 08', and I'm severely against any of these fuckers getting more resources to attack me. It's absurd. What's more absurd is that both aisles will support it, but Americans healthcare will be at 5k a month 😂〽️

    Cleptocracy much?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Make no mistake. Just like the housing bubble of 2007 and 2008 there are people poised and ready to make tons of money off of the deflation of the AI bubble.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    The money to be made is on predicting when, not it it's going to burst. Otherwise we'd all be betting the house on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Actually it's more about the how. The people betting against the housing market put their chips down as early as 2005. They just had to find a way to profit from it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (2 children)

    Interesting. And what was the how back then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Sub-prime mortgages going into default en masse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    That's not how people made money. That's what precipitated the crash. Shorting companies that were exposed would have been one route to make money - but as I said before, the smart piece there is in the timing not the mechanism. Shorting stock isnt difficult...Shorting it at the right time can be.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Let me fix that for you: "When an AI bubble pops..."

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 61 points 11 months ago (9 children)

    [he] addressed the “immense” energy needs of AI, acknowledging that the intensive energy requirements of expanding AI ventures have caused slippage on Alphabet’s climate targets. However, Pichai insisted that the company still wants to achieve net zero by 2030 through investments in new energy technologies. “The rate at which we were hoping to make progress will be impacted,” Pichai said, warning that constraining an economy based on energy “will have consequences.”

    We need "line go up" so badly, we're willing to bake the planet.

    “We will have to work through societal disruptions,” he said, adding that the technology would “create new opportunities” and “evolve and transition certain jobs.”

    Someone once described AI as "a way for the wealthy to access the benefits of the skilled, without allowing the skilled to access the benefits of wealth".

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    or since there are FOSS AI models that are free as in free beer it allows everyone to access the benefits of the privileged - i.e. those who can specialized in fields like arts that aren't conducive to making enough money out of the gate to survive as a working class person

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (5 children)

    "Privileged" lol.

    If you couldn't make a poem before "AI", you still can't make a poem now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 11 months ago* (4 children)

    Do you have another retort besides "lol"? Spending the amount of time required to produce professional art when an income isn't directly guaranteed is a risk most of us can't take, FYI.

    You still can't make

    Yeah and why would I need to?

    If I don't enjoy that particular process nearly enough to learn how to make it good, and I wanted it to be good and I was feeling creative and had an idea for it, I could just get it made for me, free of charge, free of corpo influence or any strings attached. It's a sweet deal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Spending the amount of time required to produce professional art when an income isn't directly guaranteed is a risk most of us can't take, FYI.

    Because you don't care about making art, so you choose comfort and financial safety. It has nothing to do with "Privilege".

    You're talking about outsourcing art, but then complain about who actually make art.

    Art isn't output/result. That's exactly what you're getting from your gen slop.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 11 months ago* (2 children)

    Because you don't care about making art, so you choose comfort and financial safety.

    Yeah, I choose to eat, so do you, evidently.

    But my choices on how I earn that bread were more limited than yours, again - evidently.

    Beyond that, I choose not to make assumptions about you or your life like you've done with mine.

    Also lol "comfort and financial safety". No. Not for most people in most of this world. It's more like survival vs not survival.

    So how does this have nothing to do with privilege? It literally is what privilege is.

    Telling poors to learn art is like telling someone to bet everything on starting a business. It's a good idea only if you're rich, because if you fail - and to learn you must fail sometimes - you can try again, but the working class doesn't get the luxury of second chances.

    You're talking about outsourcing art, but then complain about who actually make art.

    No, I'm talking about generating art from a prompt, I have no issues with people who make art obviously, as long as they don't have an issue with those who lack the resources to develop the skills and instead use AI to put their ideas into action or polish existing ones.

    If you'd like to change my mind, show me a few professionally successful present-day working class artists.

    This means they:

    1. Make most of their income from their work
    2. Most active period this or past decade and they are no older than 40.
    3. Working class background, so no artists in family at all, no industry connections they didn't make themselves, no nepotism etc.

    Also lol, of course I care about making art, why else would I be even talking about it, much less pointing out that generative AI accidentally or not - corrects a class injustice?

    If I saw no value in making art, why would I ever consider it an injustice that the working class cannot enjoy it?

    I make music in my spare time whenever I can and have for years, and no I don't and would never use any generative AI tools for the music itself, nor do I even sample any other music, and I think I've even improved at it somewhat despite a lack of basically any education on the subject matter beyond a few guides and YouTube videos on music theory here and there. It's a highly rewarding hobby.

    Realistically though, that 'whenever' is simply not enough time to create anything professional and polished enough for me to sell and for it to appeal to anyone besides myself and whatever loved one is unfortunate enough to be subjected to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 11 months ago*

    “I’m gonna take you all down with me!”

    Then I’ll ask for a sweet socialist bailout while the rest of you enjoy rugged capitalism.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Translation: we juiced the bubble so good trying to make a trillion dollars that when it pops, the world economy is coming down with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    Don't worry, I'm sure there will be a huge government bailout that the people have no say in. Remember 2008? I don't remember voting to give away piles of money to the bankers.

    You know what Iceland did when there was suspicious investing and they had bank failures? They put the bankers in jail! What did we do? We gave them a bonus!

    God bless America, because we'll need it!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 11 months ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    It's only bizarre until you realize this isn't a failure of the system. This is a success for the people getting the payout. They have lobbied and deeply infiltrated the government. The US government doesn't serve the citizenry anymore. It serves the rich and powerful. The rest of us are just useful as consumers to funnel money to the corporations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago

    Nah, most of Europe did exactly the same thing as America last time around. Hell the EU went out of its way to make sure bankers didn't lose money (how do you think Greek Debt which was entirely in private hands ended up in the hands of the EU, which then turned around and forced Austerity of Greece "to avoid losses of money of EU taxpayers") - the Corruption was just as bad on this side of the pond as it was on the other.

    Iceland stands out because they were almost unique in the West in making the bankers pay for their shenanigans.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago

    The sooner the better. Can't wait!

    Kaboom! 💣 💥

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 11 months ago (4 children)

    The sooner the better. Less LLM infatuation means better customer service, less overall environmental impact, and more water available to cities.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 11 months ago

    This is code for "Hey government, you better be ready to bail us all out".

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago

    Oh, that's where he's wrong. I think a great many of us will enjoy it.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Any company not using AI for anything will be pretty unaffected when this bubble pops.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 11 months ago

    The utter lack of self-awareness…

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 11 months ago

    Good good. Let it all fall apart.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    That sounds like a threat

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    That money goes somewhere so some people will be getting out better

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    It doesn't work like this though. If your pension fund is heavy into a company that suddenly loses 90% of its value, your pension suddenly becomes worth a lot less..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago (1 child)

    Some people wouldn't be those people then would it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    I know what you're saying, but if a company is valued at 10 billion for instance, then gets revalued down to 100mil, that difference has not gone anywhere, it has simply ceased to exist. And if you had invested 100k to own 0.001% of the 10 billion company, you now only own 0.001% of a 100 million company. Your investment has lost its value, with whatever implications that has for you. The value hasn't shifted around, it's ceased to exist!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    I've taken shits with more value to the human race than Sundar Prichai

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    Big tech has never seen common people as anything but data. It's funny they now are concerned for what will happen to us if their bubble bursts

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    What's funny is that you think they are concerned 🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    I don't think they believe the concern is real.

    "We should Improve society somewhat".

    "It's funny you think they would let society improve lol! How naive!"

    Please don't be like that. It's peak douche behavior.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Well now you know why Warren Buffet cashed out. He's going to buy all the tech companies on a fire sale.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago (1 child)

    Who is “no one”? Because yeah, there will be splash damage, but some sectors (“AI” companies and the megacorps involved in the massive ongoing self-dealing circlejerk) will collapse, but others will simply see a correction. And I’ve already dumped anything LLM-related (as well as most US-based securities and ETFs) as of early this year. So I’ll take a hit (everyone will take a hit), but it’s not going to be nearly as bad as it will be for all the bag holders.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 11 months ago

    Tech companies will ask (and get) an enormous bailout so they don't have to fire everyone, and then they will fire everyone anyway. In order to recoup some of the budget losses, King Trump will implement one or two more taxes

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago

    I'm waiting with money to buy Google for 1 dollar.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

    Quiet quitting is our best bet. If they don't give you decent health care and a retirement plan then we're just doing the minimum. Why would we work harder for less in return? Maybe we can just all start our own AI business. Every American can have their very own AI automated business with passive income.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    If they don’t give you decent health care and a retirement plan then we’re just doing the minimum. Why would we work harder for less in return?

    Don't even do the minimum. Will McDonald's give give you half a of a cheeseburger if you only pay half? Will a bank only seize half your house if you start paying half your mortgage payment? Why would we give them half-effort for a penny less than what we're worth?

    It's painful and slow but more and more people are learning to live without working. Not an easy life but it's probably going to be necessary at some point if this system is ever going to change.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago* (1 child)

    Quiet quitting is such a bizarre phrase for me as Irish. As long as we do our jobs right, we can do whatever we want. At the end of the day, a job is meant to put food on the table, not be your life. Even some of the worst companies I have worked have a laidback attitude compared to workplaces abroad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

    Quiet quitting is such a bizarre phrase

    It's just a trendy phrase for what has always been called work to rule.

    Do precisely what your job description requires and not a single bit more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    promises promises.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Don't threaten my good time with a threat

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    I will get out totally clean of that, so thank you and fuck you

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    One can dream.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 11 months ago

    Uh….well yeah.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 11 months ago

    So, they want us all to suffer for their bad decisions? Well that just puts us all on the same playing field (except for the 1%) and at which point, we will revolt and take them (1%) down with us.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    The plumbers will. The electricians will. The carpenters will. The bricklayers will. The farmers will. The steel plant workers will. The dockyard workers will.

    Yes, if you’ve got savings invested it’ll touch you, but the actual jobs - you know the ones adding and making real, concrete things, probably won’t notice a big different if the AI stocks tank 30% in a day.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 11 months ago

    Many electricians, carpenters, and steel plant workers are currently working to build AI data centers. Funding other projects has been postponed or cancelled as the AI data centers are able to pay more

    Electricians especially. Trump cancelled many clean energy projects, which created large swaths of electricians without work if it weren't for AI data centers

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Fuck it we ball. *gets a needle*

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    It will be dirty pleasure fo sho

  • source
  • 30 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    9 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    9 comments in c/technology@piefed.social view that post
    2 comments in c/arstechnica_index@ibbit.at view that post