[–] 1 point 7 hours ago

I guess it was a little over a year, but she did say he was largely absent, and when he wasn't he was very controlling and seemed deeply insecure, she assumed about her success, but seeing his pattern of behavior as a serial rapist and sexual abuser, to me it sounds a lot more like he couldn't balance his predatory nature and behavior in a sham marriage to make him look less threatening to afford him more credibility against victims, serial rapists and abusers have been shown to be very clearly aware and willing to plan their lives around access to victims and safety from victims like seeking access to fields like medicine or education to gain access to victims, or law enforcement or religion to shield them from victims accusations.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 10 points 7 hours ago

    it's all good, the more he spirals the more overt his racism, ethnic cleansing, corruption, and incompetence, the better. It will only make the public will all the more driven to swing back to reality.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

    it's not intended as a side effect, it's a very well known tactic in law writing that goes back to some of the earliest laws humans ever made, the point of vauge language in law is to have wider appeal, and to claim arbitrary power by the law giver.

    edit: just adding that part of that arbitrary power is getting people to behave in extreme ways outside of the scope of the legal system 'just in case'. so, people deleting face sitting porn to comply with 'no strangulation' even though there's no language to explicitly say so, and no legal reason to do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 21 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

    there's websites that are deleting face sitting as it's unclear if it can be legally viewed as suffocation, so it's a classic morality law that uses vague language to get broad self censorship happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›