Most do, but you can get egg-free pastas.
Some of my favs:
History/Archeology
Ancient Americas Archeology of native North & Central American peoples
Modern History TV
Townsends Exploring 18th century life
Zoology/Animal-stuff
Casual Geographic *
Moth Light Media
Lindsay Nikole *
Ze Frank's True Facts This is the kid-friendly version of his channel
Astronomy/Astrophysics
Dr Becky
PBS Space Time
Both of these might be a bit above a pre-teen's understanding. I would have loved these as a kid, complexity be damned.
General Science
PBS Nova
Earth Science
PBS Terra
Chemistry
ACS Reactions
Art & Literature
Great Art Explained
Great Books Explained
*: language/subject matter/style might not be a good fit for younger children.
Time for someone to learn about the Streisand effect....
A little while ago I was working on a youth soccer certification. They talked a bit about the differences in warm-up/cool-downs related to different age groups. They didn't go too deep into but said roughly what you were describing. Pre-adolescent didn't really need much in the way of warm-up/cool-down and you could/should just "let 'em play". It wasn't until later that you didn't to be more on-task with that kind of thing to avoid injury.
Remind me again... when Amazon bought the rights to the Seattle Center Arena... what did they decide to name it? So yeah, about that...
You raise an interesting point about someone that is unable to make decisions for themselves. I suspect that any person in such a state would already have a designated decision maker for them (a parent, guardian, officer of the court, medical authority, etc). I would think that this person would be the the deciding factor.
If that's what it takes to improve traffic, then hail satan!
Drink gasoline? In this economy?!
My experience with it wasn't quite the same, but was similar. When I was looking at it, it was very much in that category of cert that was mostly about memorizing the study guides/books, and less about building/proving a skillset (which, as mentioned, is hardly uncommon with IT certs unfortunately).
Where it did have some "value" was that it was a well-known cert that was very useful for "proving" that your org was in compliance. A badge you could hang to auditors and costumers/clients that said you knew your stuff. Again, hardly uncommon with IT certs. :\
I don't think it's completely worthless. Depending on where you're at in your career, it can be a useful experience. But it should, I think, be treated like a (relatively) beginner-tier cert. Something you might consider at an early point in your journey, but not one I'd necessarily build your resume around. I also think that it's value may depend a lot on exactly what your role in an organization looks like. CEH for an entry-level pen tester or incident handler? Yeah, maybe. For something like an IAM developer or a privacy analyst... eh, less so.
This is exactly the kind of thing I want! Perfect!
That moment you're reminded that, oh yeah, this guy was a comedian back in simpler times.
Remember, if you see someone stealing from a data center.... no, you didn't.