top 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 206 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've lost the ability to detect whether this is a real quote or not.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago

    When I started reading the quote, I assumed it was a joke, just from the format, not the content. When I got to the part where it said, "It used to be called the Department of War and it had a stronger sound," I felt the typical disgust and contempt I usually feel when listening to Trump, and so I knew it was almost certainly a genuine quote.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 80 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    History lesson for anyone who needs it, including occupants of the White House: The Department of Defense was created in 1947 by merging the Department of War, the Department of the Navy, and the recently formed Department of the Air Force. Prior to the merger, the War Department managed only the Army. The name Department of Defense was political: it didn’t reuse any of the names of the former departments, so it couldn’t be seen as one absorbing the others, i.e. the Army absorbing the Navy and the Air Force they had just spun off from the Army Air Corps.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 152 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    He doesn't understand the negative connotations behind it and why one of the main branches of the empire needs to be obfuscated in euphemism? I kinda believe the mental decline rumours now, lol, or maybe he's just testing the waters to see if Americans still have that bloodthirst like the good ol' Bush days, idk.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I think he just likes to dangle something controversial and shiny in his left hand so you forget he’s hiding the Epstein files behind his back with the right hand. He def knows how to rustle the left’s jimmies, unfortunately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I think he is just that simple of a man.

    Defense is not aggressive and therefore bad. War sounds aggressive so it's good.

    That's it. That is the whole thought process of this simpleton.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    No, stop treating him like he's some sort of brilliant conman. He's never been. Even his own sister has said that he's a moron - his entire plan consists of "I wanna". I want it to be the Department of War, I want to be the one launching wars, I want to be the guy pushing the Big Red Button. He's a narcissist, and narcissists rarely tend to think more than a step or two ahead. They assume everyone's dumber than them, and they can rarely be dissuaded from this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I agree he’s far from brilliant, and I really mean his admin more than him alone. There are some real insidious people with his ear

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago

    Because going to war should not be an ambition you dumb fucking fascist!

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "we want offense too"
    The obese imbecile being alive is offensive. The fact that it breathes is offensive.
    And the fact that it's not strapped to a guillotine that's got a blunt rusty blade is fucking offensive!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    someone put him out of his misery. its cruel to force him to live like this. cruel to everyone else in the world at least

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'd tell him to look at the flowers but he paved the rose garden.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago

    It's the same reason Captain America beats people up with a shield.

    It's hard to think of yourselves as as a saviour otherwise.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The high cholesterol in Donny’s body needs to declare war on his heart and fail it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Department of Death might sound even stronget

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • president of peace, everyone /s

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    How are we supposed to know what he's talking about when he tweets that "The Dow is rising up after another successful meeting with Putin"? Is he talking about Dept. of War or Dow Jones?

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Is it bad that my thought was "well at least that's more accurate"?

    My mind went to how "the department of defense" was Orwellian AF. I mean his reasoning is fucked don't get me wrong.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I absolutely agree with you and surprisingly, Trump on this.

    Broken clock and all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Yeah, in this rare instance, I agree with Uncle Donny. The US hasnt fought a war for peace or defense in over 75 years. Might as well change the name to more accurately depict its purpose. He is still a moron though....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    It was the "War Department" from 1789 to 1947.

    And also the Department of the Navy was its own thing for a while, as was the Department of the Army, then Air Force, before getting folded into the War Department. Harry Truman dissolved the War Department in 1947 because 1) WWII was over and so the US was not in a declared war anymore, and 2) there was a larger consolidation of war powers under the SecDef post-war.

    If anything, name it the Department of Violence and Death and see how people react.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    And on the other side of his mouth he's saying he thinks he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Here comes the department of grammar. Can I enroll?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 44 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Setting aside my Trump hate for a moment: this is a good thing. “Department of Defense” was always a euphemism. “Defense spending” my ass. Let’s call it what it is and then see if Americans feel as good about spending so much on a “Department of War” versus “Defense.”

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Thinking like that its a good thing right up until the voters are actually stoked about a department of war.

    Guarantee it wont be long until youre seeing red hats going off about how cool it is they finally have a department of war as if its a whole new thing.

    "Remember how much ass we kicked with only a defense department? Look out world! MIGHTY TRUMP finally made a department of war too!"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I’m sure you’re right about a certain segment of people. I don’t think the euphemistic name is holding those people back from loving the military though.

    I do think it’s hard for Congress to sell the general public on “cuts to our defense” though, and cuts to the “Department of war” will be an easier sell.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    This isn't a good thing because it's not an effort to be more honest, it's a signal of future intent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    There's a reason why after WWII the Department of War was renamed Department of Defense.

    We weren't at war. We're not currently at war, either. Chester's gotta ask Congress to rubber-stamp a war first.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    That’s some very antiquated and naive logic. NONE of these conflicts involved a formal declaration of war:

    Korean War

    Vietnam War

    Persian Gulf

    Afghanistan

    Iraq War

    So you’re going to tell me we weren’t at war for any of those? Bullshit. There’s been plenty of work for a Department of War in the US since WW2.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I mean that after WWII, the public sentiment was "We're done with war. Whew!" That's exactly why officially declaring war and using the war powers workaround was used in ever example you gave.

    It was the Department of War for 150 years before 1947 when Truman changed the name.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Defense product >> WAR MACHINE

    Military Contractor >> MERCENARY

    Ambassador >> SPY MASTER

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Dumbass pedophile rapist.

    RELEASE THE EPSTEIN FILES

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Ministry of Peace sounded too gay

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    How does one still support a man child like this?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    He's already offensive. Now he wants a whole government department to do it too

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Department of "Defense" is just a whitewashing cover for the fact that its a war department, to help convince Americans we need to spend all of our tax money on it... So sure go ahead and rename it, genius

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 24 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And they STILL think this. And before Canadians get all smug, look at how popular Smith and Ford are and how Poilievre got elected by a landslide in AB. The more Doug grifts, the better he does in polls.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    King Charles called and said stfu AB. true story. First Nations were there too and I think they were filling in the eviction notices

    Also AB conservatives won that same riding in the main election too. they are still short the riding pp lost in the first place.

    By the by he’s not regained the lead of the party…yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Anytime this fool says anything, it sounds like I'm listening to a fucking toddler.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    America going back to its jingoistic roots I see.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    taking us all the way back to the 40s with the War Department eh?

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    So mad that twat missed him and only grazed his ear

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Who gives a shit? It’s a more apt name for it so go ahead. Now where are those Epstein files?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    This is brilliant! His knowledge, eloquence and persuasiveness are remarkable.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›