[–] 6 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

They absolutely do their jobs very thoroughly - but only where it will have no repercussions for them. There probably isn’t even a shift assigned to this lot, thanks to some back room agreement with the cops.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 21 hours ago

    Agreed and thats probably why his apology fell on the sword so completely: there’s no cost to admitting the moral failing and he is confident in the long run he will get away with it.

    But material violations of commerce or espionage laws…. There’s zero about that in his apology and he will deny and fight like hell.

    My only point here is to point out how trivial the human / moral / family dimension obviously is to him. Compete and total admission of guilt right away. Because he doesn’t give a fuck. Only thing that actually moves him is his job and company.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 child)

    Losing 4% of your body mass would be 5-7 fingers.

    Don’t worry, corporations and shareholders definitely feel 4%. The average consumer always sees small percentages like this and thinks they don’t matter. They do.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 18 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    His apology was so pat and by the numbers. You just know he had AI write it.

    The actual explanation is “I am rich and famous and thought that should entitle me to whatever sex I want. And I thought I could get away with it.”

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Yeah I don’t even know if the company I work for has actually gotten more benefit than it’s cost us. The bill is significant, for one thing. For another we have a whole group of people developing AI tools for internal use now. They aren’t cheap. Of course there’s some benefit but is it net positive? No idea. Is it hugely positive? Fuck no.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 2 weeks ago

    Yeah. A naive response would be “isn’t UPS big too?” But the shipping is only part of retail logistics. When you also control the warehousing distribution, and can back-feed logistical availability data all the way to the retail interface to affect what people buy in the first place… you have power that no fleet of trucks alone can overcome.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    Can only assume the cheaper option is the higher volume option that will have better leverage from economies of scale. Lower price is usually where that surfaces but I can easily see it surfacing as more flights and faster delivery if the route is just right.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    For years I’ve been taking a pee jug along when I go camping. I buy a 2-gallon jug of kitty litter and keep the nice wide-mouth jug it comes in. They’re firm plastic and have a nice handle. I keep one right outside my tent for midnight pees. Way easier than hoofing all the way to the bathrooms or whatever.

    This time we actually brought the pee back and added it to the compost pile! It’s like two of my hobbies finally came together after years. Huzzah!

    view more: next ›