searching a specific problem, on what search engine it is..

no satisfactory answer. what else is there? other than just asking questions on lemmy?

all 62 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 54 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

well just make a post with the wrong answer and somebody will come to correct you

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

    That used to be the case. Now, LLMs slurp up the wrong answer and regurgitate it until it's just what everyone believes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

    Search has grown worse IMO to push you to use ai more. Ai reviews, ai sites, they need to give the appearance of it working better so you'll use it. To do this they dumbed it way down.

    Use something other than Google or Bing, like Ecosia, Qwant, or Mojeek.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

    Search has been worse for over a decade, SEO optimization race killed it plus advertising.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 17 hours ago

    I think what your seeing is search engines don't work like they used to. They give you what they think you want not what you asked for. Google might have been the first to make there search worse. They want you to use AI instead now. It also sucks. I usually try other search engines other than the main ones. Also indexing the entire web is not easy and would take a large amount of resources to do so some of the smaller ones seem incomplete.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

    It's gotten terrible over the last 5 years. AI slop is infecting everything and causing so much noise, it's impossible to find real info anymore.

    Best I can suggest is searches across Starpage, DDG, Qwant and Brave. When one fails, try the next one.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 child)

    Good suggestions except for Brave.

    I would also add Kagi - I usually save this one for when other searches fail.

    Edit: Oh, and Ecosia is another you could use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 14 hours ago

    Well, you can just use a Searxng or 4get instance and get the Brave results without needing to trust them that much. Depends on your threat model.

    Since Kagi is paid, demands a login, and is private, it's hard to fully trust without an audit trail. Which they don't have enough for Privacy Guides to OK it to recommend. People can be politically aligned to you and still sell your data.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago (1 child)

    tenbluelinks.org gets you to have the web api for google. Can install it in your browser. I've been using it fr a year, even managed to build a shortcut (I named it "Google no AI") in Safari on iOS and searches are tolerable on google again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 43 minutes ago

    Yeah, I have a Searxng and 4get instance and I could add the Google API and have that option as well, but it seems like a minimal amount of effort barely proportional to what Google can go these days.

    Maybe I'll give it a shot.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 15 hours ago (1 child)

    Search is not an easy service. The non-AI search relied on server farms, indexing what is on the internet, and pointing you at what just likely is the answer. There was a sweet spot somewhere between maybe 2005 and 2015 when Google search was fantastic. With the data it knows about you it got you there maybe 19 out 20 searches.

    And then things started happening. Google realised that they could sell more ads if their results were a little more shit and they required you to do more searches or click thru more results pages. At the same time, the content of stuff on the internet may have also reached a point where the idea of indexing everything started reaching its practical limits. And the longer time has elapsed since the graphical internet came about, the more deadwood has accumulated. Websites built in ancient days, now unmaintained, services that ended, expired licenses and certificates, etc. The answer you're looking for may have been out there but for one reason or another can no longer be retrieved.

    That's all before the slop tsunami hit. And this food of content makes it harder still.

    So-called AI is technology that's being beta tested on everybody. I'm sure it's getting better. At the same time there are plenty of valid reasons to look at it with suspicion. The bullshit it has made up, the additional environmental impact, the stealing of training data, etc. There is every chance that sAIrch will be better in the future than the sweet spot search of the recent past. But we're not there yet in my opinion. We're in the in-between time and we just have to muddle thru.

    Google is betting big on this prospect. It's self serving for them because they can downgrade their massive indexing operation and/or free up computing resources for other tasks. So I'm not sure if they're more driven by financial motivations or conviction in the idea. Too early to tell. Nobody in the late 90s saw Google coming and eating everybody's lunch in the search market. There is also a chance that a new company we haven't heard from yet is waiting in the wings.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 14 hours ago

    Ya I agree. It def went to shit even before AI. Sponsored results pushed more and more, and SEO slop abusing googles mechanics took over. Adding forum to the search became the only way to get anything because websites were trying to maximize time on page without even offering an answer. Eventually as the internet shrank and forums started dying out ‘Reddit’ was a good addition to a search, but that has since gone to shit too. It’s like a library of Alexandria has become a library of babel. Information is being gated and incredibly difficult to search for. I downloaded Wikipedia the other day because it’s starting to feel more inportant to have local access to information, but it only goes so far.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 17 hours ago

    I love Wikipedia

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    Search has gotten progressively worse over the past 10 years, and 5ish years ago it got so bad that it was a problem.

    I gave up on Google as a search engine as the results nowadays seem like filler content tailored towards page rankings.

    I started using Kagi about a year ago, and searching feels useful again. Highly recommended.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 14 hours ago*

    I often times use the time filters to filter out content after 2020. (Of course only for timeless topics)
    I also use uBlacklist to filter out obvious AI Slop especially those just reposting human stuff, like grokipedia. (there are also ready made lists for that) as well as highlighting great sources like wikipedia, mdn and what not.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 15 hours ago (7 children)

    Noai.duckduckgo.com

    Still not the best, but it searches the web in the old school way, so it’s more reliable.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 14 hours ago

    I stubbornly clung to Google despite years of increasing problems out of habit and convenience. I just switched to DuckDuckGo a few weeks ago because I was finally fed up.

    The turning point was trying to remember a song with only a few words in my head. I searched multiple variations of it, with and without quotes. The AI response (because I hadn’t turned it off) basically said, “nah mate, there aren’t any songs that say anything like that,” and search contained less than 10 total results, none of which were helpful.

    Finally I remembered a few more words and searched again, and found the exact song. And it included, verbatim, a line I’d previously searched in quotes.

    I also searched it on Kagi and didn’t get any results, sadly (I really love the concept of Kagi).

    Since switching to DDG has been like going back 8 years in search quality—way better.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

    That's my go to as well. I just wish the default page was the noai one and if you wanted slop you had to go to ai.duckduckgo.com

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

    I use Kagi for search. Between it and my self-hosted copy of Wikipedia, I'm pretty happy.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

    How much space does Wikipedia take? Do you host a full copy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

    I host a full English copy.

    Full (all articles with images) is 120gb at the moment. I refresh monthly and keep the three latest copies, just in case someone fucks with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 15 hours ago (1 child)

    Google has gotten tremendously awful at the basic fundamentals of searching.

    So you've got this stupid AI thing of theirs that thinks it's helpful by giving you its thoughts about what it thinks about what you've searched for. It also brings up relatively irrelevant things.

    Then you've got another block of some of the dumbest things that get asked. You know the "People also asked about..." section which is just an annoying rabbit hole that degrades your intelligence just by reading what's there.

    Then you've got about the first page plastered with ads and suggestions that have nothing to do with what you're looking for. Forcing you to go through pages until maybe something is there.

    Ain't it wonderful? /s

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 14 hours ago

    Or my recent experience: the search returns fewer than 10 results total. But change my search a tiny bit and suddenly I get the normal endless results, which literally contain the search terms I previously included in quotes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 15 hours ago

    SEO slop was a problem 10 years ago. Now it’s AI generated SEO slop which is indistinguishable from the SEO slop because AI trained on reams of the crap.

    I think that forums really dropped off in popularity; people move to Facebook, discord, or Reddit closed communities so it’s not indexed or it’s hard to access. That, and the value of a blog approaches zero with the volume of slop out there, makes it hard to find stuff online. It’s not being posted in the first place.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 13 hours ago

    my favorite searches are for a problem and you get plenty of forums and such with people who saw the problem but no solution.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

    Use better engines like Kagi is the answer. Startpage.com is an OK free option. You could also try Ecosia, Qwant, or DuckDuckGo.

    Google is absolute dogshit now because they went all in on AI with no regard for what the user experience is actually like (same shit they pulled when they killed Assistant to try and force people to use Gemini, which is horrible as an assistant - can't even reliably set a fucking timer and it still requires gigs of space on your phone and an active internet connection just to tell you to use the timer app, WTF?). Their search was well past its heyday, but things really took a nosedive with Gemini. Their goal is to make money now rather than correctly indexing data and helping people find things, they are not the company they originally were and haven't been for a long time.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 child)

    I subscribed to Kagi over a year ago. Once and a while I'll try another engine and they're all terrible by comparison.

    Highly recommended if you can swing it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 14 hours ago

    This isn't helpful but might make you feel better. Funny song about Google. "Current state of search engines - music video" https://youtu.be/jrFv1O4dbqY?is=2IskI2DQZ4h_oPmm

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 17 hours ago

    Not really.

    Try refining your search terms and/or use advanced search.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 54 minutes ago

    it's literally a skill issue

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago

    Yeah, search engines are shit these days. I make posts on help forums if I can't get an answer. Or am in various Matrix rooms where I might ask as well.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

    If you use Google, try moving away from that! Half of its results are sponsored and the other half SEO optimised crap nowadays, and there are better search engine alternatives. I would push you towards Qwant and Ecosia, because they are working together to develop a search index independent from Google and Bing (which is being trialled in France and Germany!), and they both have much stronger privacy policies, being hosted in the EU after all. They are both as easy to use as Google, no excuses for something being too "different" (it's just a search box and your results)

    Between Qwant (blue and glowy) and Ecosia (green and flat), the difference is mostly whether you prefer the look of one over the other. Ecosia is also a non-profit that uses some of its revenue to plant trees, which is pretty awesome! If you want to look at their reports, they're easily accessible on their website. Qwant is still great though, and you will get good results from either!

    Avoid Startpage (owned by an advertising company as far as I understand) and Brave (involved in weird crypto stuff, replacing affiliate links, etc.). DuckDuckGo has become a lot closer to Google in terms of the number of sponsored results now, plus they are based in the U.S.

    And of course, SearXNG is awesome too, there are lots of public instances (see searx.space for a list), and you can self-host it too. It basically aggregates results from the search engines of your choosing!

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 6 hours ago

    No, I can find what I want and search different ways depending on what I'm after. I wanted hotels so I used a hotel website and found a room. I wanted some recipe ideas and found a few and combined what I wanted from them. I ask for a summary of how all the elements in us were made and are now part of us, the universe in each of us, and it gives information and the sources to check as needed. It works, I don't need to feel about it, but know how to use it.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 4 hours ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago

    You’re going to get downvoted and so am I for agreeing with you because that’s the nature of the internet currently.

    I often have a hard time figuring out how to search for what I want. I’ve found I can actually work through some things with ai easier than I can with a search engine and quicker than waiting for the right human to help me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 16 hours ago

    I’m confused by some people saying “Google wants you to use AI now”. I think what they mean is they think Google wants you to just use the shitty AI answer at the top of its results. This is because people don’t know how AI works and confuse the technology with specific products. A result summarized by AI has to come up as fast as possible in search results and doesn’t have time to find good or verified info.

    Search has been broken for years before AI was a twinkle, because people and companies don’t care if you find what you’re looking for, they only care if they make money off you. Want to know when shoes were invented? How about 92 links to Amazon to buy shoes instead? I just stopped using search for years.

    To answer your question, I use Claude, usually Opus. I ask it to find the information I want, where to look or not to look in some cases, and if its something technical or troubleshooting related , I tell it to do research and only rely on training data as a last resort.

    Since I started doing this I’ve learned so much more than I could have with search engines, and had conversations about the information to really make sure I understood. Its also great for getting info on laws and specific scenarios and has gotten me, and friends out of several predatory situations that would have required an expensive and unrealistically motivated lawyer. Like another commenter said, use your common sense, ask for direct links to its sources if you want to verify, and never use Google, Brave, or other shitty search engines again.

    Message me if you have a specific issue. I’m pretty good at finding where a request went wrong if unhelpful info comes back.

  • source
  • [+] -16 points 17 hours ago* (9 children)

    Ask an LLM. Haters will tell you it'll just make stuff up but the answer you get is almost certainly correct. Just use your common sense to validate the results just like you would with a search engine.

    Let there be downvotes.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

    How do you validate the answers when you can't get results through something like a search engine?

    Why wouldn't you just use the validation steps to get the valid answer the first time instead of asking the bullshit machine first?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 child)

    Not a fan of AI but i did use Duck.ai a couple of times and when i asked, it usually put the source under its answer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago

    There is an underlying issue with how AI presents sources in a way that doesn't make it clear why those sources were selected or if they are the current source.

    For example, one of the few times I tried AI the sources were older versions of documents not posted to the current website or in half of the cases contradicted the ai answer text. My favorite example is that it used a proposed law as a skurce for a change that never made it out of committee, but also included a link to the actual law that had the right information. A good search engine would just link directly to the law for the correct answer. If it was right a few times in a row I can see someone not checking sources after a while and that introduces a trusted vector for misinformation.

    At least with a search engine I can generally tell if the site in the results is reliable, like a university or known organization.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 16 hours ago (1 child)

    Well yesterday I asked about near-extinct tree species that could survive in the climate I live in and when it gave me the names of those species I googled them to double check and to find out how much those cost. It pointed me in the right direction and I figured out the rest myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 15 hours ago*

    It's certainly either correct or laughably incorrect. One of the two. Who are the boring idiots who don't love playing such a fun game?! And who cares how many rainforests we burn down too, right?!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 14 hours ago

    I test them every now and never just so I can be better informed when I call the utter shit (still deeply unethical regardless of quality of the results)

    I nce asked chatGPT to make me a 1000€ PC build. It told me that 16GB of DDR5 ram was only 90€, and provided me a link to buy it. To no Ines surprise the link had it listed for 400€. Also it game me a motherboard and CPU combo which were incompatible.

    Another one was that my wife was looking for a specific type of yoga classes in our area, but we could not find it. Asked chatGPT with the specific cities and country I was looking for it, and it gave me a link to a yoga studio in a different continent.

    If you still.have to validate the results with a search engine, what ianthe point of the massive waste of energy and water?

  • source
  • parent