[–] 1 point 41 minutes ago (1 child)

It ends with "For you turquoise is ___". Turquoise is turquoise. If I had to choose, I guess it's blue, and so my line is gonna be between turquoise and green, but it's actually turquoise. But I can see an argument for turquoise being green.

Ultimately, it seems like the actual question the test answers is "If you had to choose, do you consider turquoise to be blue or green?"

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 4 points 53 minutes ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago)

    Rocket science is really cool. Rocket scientists are huge geeks about rocket science. If there are really only a handful of organizations hiring rocket scientists (and most of them are run by megalomaniacs or deeply entwined with the MIC), you're faced with the prospect of working for a bad company, or not working on your passion that you specialized in.

    I remember some AMAs from The Site That Shall Not Be Named by SpaceX employees, and a common comment was that they do their best to keep him distracted so they can do their actual work because his ideas are stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago*

    Roughly round is not a very precise delineation

    The actual qualification is "hydrostatic equilibrium", but I didn't want to complicate the point with technical mathematical jargon.

    there will be edge cases where it’s not clear which category they fall into

    Which is pretty par for the course so far as scientific classifications go. Classification is a human endeavor to attempt to neatly categorize things to better understand them, but the universe is what it is and defies tidy categorization. Just about any scientific classification you can devise will have edge cases and ambiguity.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 4 hours ago (2 children)

    What's the "purest sense of the term"? A planet is presently defined as a body which orbits a star, has enough mass to be roughly round, and has cleared its orbit of other objects. Dwarf planets are defined as fulfilling the first two criteria, but not the third.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Seems like the fandom violently hates it, but it slaps. Yeah I've heard people say it would've been The Chain by Fleetwood Mac, but I've seen the edit and while it syncs up well it doesn't feel like JoJo. It's so solemn, which is probably the least appropriate tone for JoJo.

    You know what is appropriate for JoJo? Weird goofy shit. You know what's weird and goofy? Japanese cowboy trap. I don't even like trap, but the outro slaps. The horse whinny samples are just chef's kiss.

    Are people just hating because it's an original song?

     

    I know this is gonna sound like the "Where exactly, so I can avoid it" meme, but I'm sincerely trying to avoid it.

    I am pretty physically active, and get massage every six months or so. I have a massage therapist I usually go to, but every once in a while it's an emergency and my go-to is booked up, so I get a sketchy strip mall massage.

    About half the time it ends with a happy ending attempt. Not that I'm against the concept, but I refuse to pay for sexual contact on principle. Also that cuts into the time spent on the actual massage I came in for, and pressures me into a huge tip for something I don't actually want.

    At the same time, I don't want to assume. It seems pretty rude to start off with "I know you're gonna wanna give me a handjob but I'm not interested". So is there some kind of standard "initiation" ritual that I can turn down when it comes up?

     

    Title. I like weird stuff that challenges the way you think. Not much of a traditional comic book reader, but there are some that have really gripped me lately (particularly the more out-there stuff by Moore or Morrison), and I'm looking for more stuff like that.

    In the last couple years I've read:

    The Invisibles
    The Filth
    Flex Mentallo
    The Sandman
    Promethea
    Morrison's Animal Man
    Transmetropolitan
    The Incal

    On my to-read list so far are Moore's Swamp Thing and the new Absolute Martian Manhunter. What else needs to be on the list?

     

    I've been thinking about print-in-place joints, and playing with my new multi-head printer.

    Has anyone been playing around with making one half of a joint from PLA and the other from PETG to get snugger PIP joints? Seems like that would be a good way to get real right tolerances without bonding.

    I did a casual search and I couldn't find anyone talking about it.

     

    I think it's finally time to upgrade from my Ender 3, and the market has... grown substantially. I'm a bit out of my depth.

    Definitely looking at a coreXY, and definitely prefer a multi-color system (multi-material really). My budget is around $600, but that's a bit flexible.

    The Elegoo Centurion Carbon 2 looks attractive, and it's on sale. But I've heard good things about multi-head systems, particularly when it comes to waste from purging. Granted, that stretches my budget a bit.

    What's the move? It seems like so many of the options (coughcoughBambu) have pretty gross anti-consumer practices. Are there any good options out there?

    Update: Alright, I pulled the trigger on a Snapmaker U1. It seems like it's going to be the Ender 3 of tool changers: the open source darling that becomes the de facto standard for the mod community.

     

    No credentials, no qualifications, just a live stream of everything that isn't classified.

    "Hey chat, these guys just said some wild shit about foreign policy. Is that legit? Lawyers in the chat, what should I say?"

    Every citizen can join the chat, decisions are based on polls. I foresee equal parts "Whip ur dik out" and "Bring up the provisions of Ch. 4 Subsection III, highlight the intersection of Art. VI with Johnson v. Hackensak"

    Not ideal, obviously, but compared to the current state of things? Could definitely be worse. Why not, at this point? At least it's transparent.

     

    First, I know what most of you are going to say. I myself was an internet atheist 20 years ago, quoting Dawkins and Sagan at magic-sky-daddy believers. But this isn't about convincing anyone to believe.

    This is about pragmatics. And, pragmatically, the single biggest enemy right now is the conservative Christian right. Anything to fracture that coalition benefits the left.

    Luckily, their gospels are pretty left-wing. So, I offer for your consideration, the Christian angle.

    I encourage those of you who went to Sunday school to brush up on your Scripture. Matthew is a treasure trove. When you're talking to someone on the right, start hitting them with chapter and verse.

    If nothing else, this is initially shocking. They're supposed to be the Christians, and you're some filthy commie reminding them that Jesus called the wealthy priests hypocrites, and told us to feed the hungry and aid the sick.

    They have defense mechanisms against your crybaby commie talk. They don't have defense mechanisms against their own scripture. At worst, you shake them loose from their script and confuse them, giving you openings for gentle deprogramming.

    At best, they might reflect on their leadership and how closely they follow Jesus' commands. Anyone who really believes in him and really reads the gospels is going to wind up a leftist, whether they call it that or not.

    Just food for thought. Read up on what Jesus said, use that against the people who claim to follow him. You don't have to believe yourself to recognize a powerful rhetorical tool.

    view more: next ›