Method A on account that that would be the maximum usable length
post
Branches and other small cylinders can be sized using M&M tubes
The generally accepted method used by scientists is to firmly push your ruler against the base of tree at the top of the branch. This is called BPEL, or bark-pressed erect length.
The only way to get an accurate measurement is to cut the branch off first.
The cylindet MUST stay intact!
It is imperative that the cylinder and the larger object remain unharmed.
But you're supposed to measure it twice before that!
Method C. Sounding rod depth required to hit the prostate.
I know it sounds odd to do this on a tree, but trust me, it works.
Tear off the branch and measure the total length.
It is imperative that the branch not be damaged
Ok chop down the tree and cut a line perpindicular to the bottom of the branch into the tree. Then measure the branch with watever remains of the tree attached.
THE CYLINDER MUST NOT BE HARMED!!!
Half the length plus seven
You have to push the branch down with one hand, such that it is perpendicular to the trunk. With the other hand place a ruler to measure trunk to tip via method A. This gives the honest expectation of ''usable" length.
The correct answer is "between 114 and 152 millimeters" because both measures are relevant and necessary from an engineering standpoint: For the purposes of sizing something such that it can utilize the branch for support, it must be made clear that the branch is solid and whole up to 114 millimeters from the trunk. For the purpose of accidental collision clearance, it is necessary to know the furthest extent of the branch's reach no matter how damaged or disrupted it is. Furthermore if the branch may break and fall off, giving it at least 152mm of clearance means that it is unlikely to accidentally catch upon something in its descent even if it "hinges" away from the trunk at the base.
But then you'd need to know the angle, too.
The larger length, even if it's at a near vertical acute angle, is likely to tumble if it breaks--which means the whole reason we're interested in its measurement is a situation where the angle is no longer fixed
Then you'd still be interested in the length at 45 degrees, the farthest possible distance.
The radius of a circle is a fixed distance from its origin at every angle.It's still the same number of milimeters distal of the trunk from the pivot point.
The concern regarding clearance would be horizontal, parallel to the surface of the Earth, roughly perpendicular to the trunk, so perpendicular distance from the trunk would be what matters. If the branch were fifty miles long but only went straight up, there would be zero horizontal clearance.
What if there is a knot at the base of the branch?
it took me way to long to realize y'all talking about penises ...
That's so innocent. Almost like a certain mythical character before opening her eponymous box...
I thought it was optimal street pathways at first, then trees, then got surprised by the amount of genitalia referencing comments then I "realised" thanks to this comment TT
What if there's a ... um ... protuberance on the bottom where the branch meets the trunk? What's the correct measuring procedure in that case?
It's critical the cylinder not be harmed
You mean like a big burl?
Wrap all the way around that and down to the tree roots and back around and up to the top branches. To be sure.
The correct way is to see how deep into a Pringle can it can go. For an accurate measure, you'll need to prevent angled entry. You can help it slide in straight by using a couple guiding sponges on either side of a latex glove attached to the rim pushed up inside it. Put a bit of Vaseline in the glove to prevent tearing the glove with the rough bark. For maximum safety, put the jar of Vaseline in a warm water bath for a few minutes beforehand to make the viscosity better for smooth entry and exit.
That sounds like an awful lot of effort just to jack off a tree branch
I don't think you need to prevent angled entry; take the deepest measurement achieved at any angle.
I measured like this when my first girlfriend asked what my size was. I told her it was 10". Suffice to say, she was definitely not impressed when the pants came off for the first time. 😅
I mean you joke but the actual rule of thumb is measuring from the crotch of the branch.
here is an authority on the matter
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=81bt0ZJLMas&pp=0gcJCUACo7VqN5tD&ra=m
Wrap the measuring tape until the entire branch is wrapped. For more accurate measurements, use thinner tape.
Personally I start measuring from the middle of my taint 😌
That's a shoddy way of doing it. There are measurement standards.
Since the internet began it’s been known that you always measure asshole to tip.
This can be easily calculated by the formula [(length x diameter) + (Weight / Girth)] / Angle of Tip^2



top 100 comments