Tbf, "porn" isn't really the appropriate word to begin with. Porn implies that all parties were consenting and consentable. CSAM is a much more fitting term.
The (original/BBC) title was intentionally clickbaity.
Kinda like it a dog wore pants, would they be on the bottom half, or the rear half?
Are you fucking kidding me?
In many ways they were far, far worse than Trump. And proud of it.
How many Mulatto bastards did Jefferson sire, again?
Because there's millions of bootlicking class-traitors who will (and have) gladly shoot first and ask questions never. And they have more guns than us.
No. That's an absurd allegation and totally fake news.
They were jealous because they didn't get to rape her first.
That's words like "whoosh", and "pow", right?

This 1 second of film is responsible for an entire generation of furries.
I think I can say the same of English. The only words that I can think of that were used so widely that they ended up losing some of their strength and even ended up being used as terms of endearment within the offended group...were originally incredibly homophobic or racist.
They still carry their weight as insults...probably even more than they did at peak off-label use because they are used so much more sparingly now.
South Park even did an episode for each of them.
They were the final joke in an amazing Derrick Comedy (Donald Glovers old sketch troupe) skit (Spelling Bee) for chrissake.
No, but if I'm drunk enough to let a cop stick his finger in my asshole, I'm too drunk to be driving.
I think I need another GPU before they get even more expensive...
By posting this type of shit you are building his platform and legitimizing his opinion.
You are an enabler of one of the most privileged, selfish, and arrogant pieces of shit alive.
Stop.
This goes for OP and Futurism.
People like Altman live by the saying "No press is bad press", by both ways you can interpret it:
- There's no such thing as bad press; and
- Not being in the press is bad.
Even if ragebait/engagement-bait. In the end it only legitimizes him.
And I get that by responding I'm also engaging, but I see this type of comment as more of an "investment" than an "engagement".
