top 95 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 144 points 5 months ago (31 children)

This confirms one Luigi isn't enough

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    Seems unwise to piss off people who haven't long left to live

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    There's a book where a bunch of people who have terminal illnesses form a kind of terror cell to suicide bomb health care boards to force the system to change. I'm almost surprised it hasn't happened yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    do you happen to remember the title or any other details about it? cuz that's going straight on my fiction reading list lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago* (21 children)

    The problem for me is that USA, one of the richest country in the world, has constantly, democratically and collectively kept voting against universal healthcare. I feel for this person but it's the choice of this country, shoting CEOs won't fix it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    It's just a symptom of the fucked up system we're in. Something like >70% of the americans want universal healthcare. Having a representative instead of a direct democracy already neuters the population's power, and then you throw in everything else like the first-past-the-post system that ensures two parties, and rich fucks controlling both parties easily, and thus both parties having no incentive to meaningfully help the population, and so on and so forth ad nauseam.

    Blaming the population as a whole is accurate, but also denying the way the system is set up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Over 90% of Democrats, 50% of independents, and even 30% of Republicans want universal healthcare. (check your favorite poll there are many).

    The citizens of the USA have constantly, democratically, and collectively voted FOR universal healthcare, repeatedly, in the only ways they can legally do so.

    If our system was democratic, we'd have universal healthcare already. Unfortunately, it's not.

    Democratic leadership has ignored 90% of their own registered voters (and the 30% Rs and 50% independents).... just as they ignore 70% support for higher minimum wages. Republicans also ignore their own constituents.

    Anyway, massive public support for universal healthcare, higher minimum wage, ending support of Israel, and so on. There's nothing democratic or collective about any of this. Open your eyes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    Sure, but why don't all do something about it? Many other countries have, while not being as rich.

    At the end of the day a guy that is explicitly against it won the popular vote, and still have at least 40% of approvals, on bad days, that's what I'm saying.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago (15 children)

    Universal healthcare was never on the ballot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 5 months ago (14 children)
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (11 children)

    Are you implying that his opponents were even remotely pro universal health care? Because they weren't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 5 months ago (10 children)

    I'm pointing that he won the popular vote so it doesn't even matters.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    I'm pointing out that him winning or not has nothing to do with universal health care, because no one on the ballot is pro universal healthcare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

    I mean ok if you want lol. trump and Harris are exactly the same, you're all victims and there's nothing your citizens can do to get universal healthcare. So keep doing it american style and hope someone will shoot all CEOs, that's your best option I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (7 children)

    Why do you have to think in such extremes? I'm not saying Trump and Harris are the same at all. But regarding support of universal health care, they are. That is to say, none. Universal health care hasn't been on the ballot at least since Clinton (the Epstein island one), maybe longer. It's kind of silly to blame voters for not voting for a candidate that literally does not exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    When you vote for someone who is EXPLICITLY against universal healthcare, you take a stand. And I'm no expert but didn't Obama tried to do something but ended up being constantly blocked by the democratically elected congress?

    What makes the USA so special that it would be impossible to have free healthcare? Cuba has it. You make it sound like your all victims but the facts are a majority of your voters made their choices over and over. And it's funny or you seem to only blames your democrats.

    If your democracy is broken do something about it. You're no victims, you collectively create all of this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/19/medicare-for-all-harris-progressives-2024-elections-00174447

    Ah I see, so when you vote for Kamala Harris, you take a stand ("no" to medicare for all, a proposition even weaker than universal healthcare). Checkeroo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    lol, you're such victims, no wonder you gave a pedophile the nuclear codes. You can't help but blame democrats. Poor americans, we should start a gofundme for the world to help citizens of the richest country in the world get medical treatments. How about a lobotomy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    Man, if only you had a better argument than namecalling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    Talking about argument....

    Nobody cares what happens in your country, keep shooting CEOs,, seems to be working just fine. Anyway we would all be surprised if you get to vote again, but you will probably elect a pedo again.

    Sorry I gotta go, appointment with my doctor. Free obviously.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    Cry harder, can't blame Independents or even Republicans for the 6 million Democrats that stayed home.

    Clean your own mess.

    Ds are now the minority, at less than 30%; Rs are less than 30%, and independents are now over 40%. You're losing voters every election, and your own voters won't show up.

    Perhaps you should insult independents less next time? You need their votes to win anything, and you can't get your own party voters to show up. Just a thought.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    Tell me you're a pedo-enabler without telling me lol.

    "Clean your own mess."

    I'm Canadian you stupid fuck, I can get free healthcare this afternoon if I need. I couldn't care less about what happens to your stupid country, you can keep shooting each other or all die of measles, the world would be A-ok with it, as long as you stop being a threat to the survival or our species.

    Your under-educated nation had the choice between a random dumb politician and the fucking antichrist, and you manage to elect (twice) the child rapist who sent his goons (soon-to-be millionaire) to take the capitol. The only good thing about your pedo-dictator is that he's destroying your country at full speed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 88 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    For-profit health care is grotesque

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

    When you think about it, this applies to everything. Intrinsically, we, as a society, work to live our lives in the best conditions possible.

    Healthcare is just another activity to better and further our living conditions. Now of course it is more important than a lot of other work (tbh mostly because so much work is bullshit nowadays) but why would it be immoral to profit off healthcare but totally okay to profit from agriculture or food distribution? To profit from the construction of homes? To profit from anything that is as fundamental and vital as healthcare?

    And if it’s wrong to profit off the “important” stuff, it makes even less sense to be able to profit from the unimportant stuff.

    The concept of profits is grotesque.

    And to be clear, I’m not talking about reaping the rewards from your hard work, that is not the meaning of profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    Health care is especially terrible as a "market" because it doesn't work like other markets.

    For example, if you have a 50% chance at something costing $100 happening, you'll probably make sure to have $100 available. If it's a 20% chance you probably have a plan, just in case. But, what if it's a 0.1% chance of something costing $100,000 you might take a gamble and not even bother with insurance. If you do get insurance, how do you calculate what is a reasonable price for that insurance? An extremely rare chance at an extremely expensive thing isn't the kind of calculation people do when they're shopping. The result, of course, is a lot of medical bankruptcies -- a phrase that simply doesn't exist in most countries.

    Then there's the ridiculous idea of trying to shop around for health care. If you're having a heart attack, are you going to check to see which hospital has the best rates? Are you going to look up ambulance services online to see which one has the highest reviews? Even if it's something that isn't urgent, are you really capable of spending your money wisely to figure out which hospital offers the best price to performance ratio for a condition you can't pronounce, let alone understand? Markets only work when the shopper is informed, and it's very hard to be an expert on health care without being a health care professional (and even then, you might only really know your own specialty).

    In addition, when you mix in preventative care, health insurance gets complicated. If you're healthier, you don't need as much insurance, which hurts the profits of insurance companies. On the other hand, once you do have insurance, they want to keep your premiums high without using their coverage, so they want you to live healthy... but not so much that you change or cancel your insurance. When health care is provided by the government, it's much simpler. It's best to keep everybody healthy and do as much preventative care as possible.

    Finally, there's the issue of externalizing costs. If someone doesn't get insurance, they don't get left to die on the street. They get taken to a hospital and they get treated. Often, they're presented with a bill after that, which then can result in a medical bankruptcy. Who is ultimately on the hook? Taxpayers. It's just that responsible people who are able to afford medical insurance pay for their own care, but then through their taxes they also pay for health care for people who don't / can't get insurance. And, even though it's not financial, there's also the externalized cost of not getting treated.

    Say you live in a city like NYC where everybody takes public transit. You really want to make sure that everyone else there showers, avoids too many perfumes, and doesn't take the train when they have a contagious illness! If someone doesn't have health insurance, so they can't go to the doctor when they get a cold, the flu or some kind of flesh-eating bacteria, they're much more likely to be on the train with that untreated illness with everyone else. In addition, things like a pandemic are much more likely to spread if someone can't afford to go to a doctor when they get sick. You're more likely to need health care in a country without universal health care simply because you're around people who don't have health care and might pass whatever they have to you.

    Most economists agree that maybe a market is a great way to generate efficiency for things like pencils and tee shirts, but it's just not suitable for healthcare.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 87 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    if a company put obscene profits before my treatment and I'm slowly dying in pain and fear then so are the ghouls who decided that money was more important than my treatment.

    What have I got to lose?
    Prison, I'll be dead before that happens.
    Death sentence? I've already got one, thanks.
    Damnation in hell? If there is a god and heaven then I'm pretty sure I'd be going up there if I take out a few billionaires. I have nothing to lose, they have everything.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

    I can only assume most of these people have spouses and kids, because that thought goes through my head too, or we'd definitely see more terminal vigilantism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    And most people can sympathize with the low level workers at the actual physical location, while the ceo and others at the top aren't necessarily easy to track and find.

    I'd be curious to hear what the 'acceptable targets' are from people who casually talk about what they would do if they were in the situation described. I know I would hesitate at every single one. It's too easy to imagine how someone has been fucked over by our society's system, and the pain it will cause for them to die. Doesn't even matter if it's a rich fuck bastard like the asshole with two kids and an estranged wife that was popped the first time uhc got its teetee slapped.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 58 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    ⣿⣿⣿⢟⣭⣶⡶⠮⣝⠻⡿⠿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⢣⣿⣿⣱⡙⣿⠗⣡⣾⣿⣿⣦⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⠿⡿⢿⣿⣿ ⣿⡇⣿⣿⣿⡽⣷⢠⡞⣱⠿⠛⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⢟⣵⡟⣡⡾⢂⢻⣿ ⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⠣⠛⢈⣶⣧⢟⣎⢋⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢰⣷⣌⣾⣿⣾⣟⣼⡿⣸⣿ ⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⢇⡇⣾⣫⣭⠻⣼⡇⣣⣵⣶⣮⢻⣿⣷⢹⣿⢿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣱⣭⡝ ⣿⢃⣿⣿⣿⢨⣶⣿⣼⣿⡀⣻⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⢇⣿⣿⠚⣿⣾⣞⣽⣿⡿⣛⣋⣵ ⡇⣿⣿⣿⡿⣮⣛⣛⡻⣿⡶⣿⡿⠿⠿⠿⠋⢸⣿⣧⠻⣿⣿⣿⡿⢛⣼⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣜⡻⢏⣵⠮⣝⣻⣋⣾⡇⠀⠀⠀⠠⢤⢠⣿⡿⣱⣿⣮⣝⢛⣋⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⡜⣿⣵⣮⣿⠿⣿⣿⣷⡠⣾⣍⢸⠘⢫⣾⣿⣿⣿⢏⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣭⣭⣵⡜⣦⣙⢿⣿⣯⣽⢏⡄⣿⣿⣿⡿⣣⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣛⢿⡇⠿⣙⡡⢩⣵⣆⣿⣇⢿⣿⣯⣜⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⠱⣶⣶⣶⣯⣼⣿⡎⢿⢟⣫⡰⣎⢿⢸⣿⣿⣦⣙⠿⣿⢧⡙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⡶⢐⣿⣟⣸⣷⢂⣴⣿⣿⣷⡝⣷⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣾⣿⡜⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⢃⣽⣿⣷⣿⣷⠻⣿⡿⢛⣵⡶⣨⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⡇⠿⢟⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⡶⣚⣬⣭⢱⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣾⣷⣶⢸⣿⣿⣿⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣵⡸⣿⡿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢇⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠸⣿⣇⢽⣿⣷⣮⣝⡛⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡰⡹⣿⣮⣙⡿⠿⢿⣋⡄⣷⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣝⡪⢝⡛⠿⠿⠿⢟⢡⡟⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣬⣝⣫⣥⣾⢣⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠵⠾⠿⢿⣿⣿⡟⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⢑⣛⡻⢿⣶⣍⢿⣧⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢠⣶⣷⣮⡳⡝⣿⣷⡙⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣎⢿⣿⣿⠿⠸⡜⣿⣷⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⣾⣿⣿⣿⡜⡜⣿⡇⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡸⣿⣿⣿⣿⢰⢹⢇⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⣻⠿⠋⣪⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 54 points 5 months ago (20 children)
  • [–] 27 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [+] -53 points 5 months ago (15 children)

    Oh ffs.

    Irrespective of the morality of Luigi's (alleged) actions (and let me emphasize here: killing people is wrong, even when the people are health care CEOs) he didn't do shit to change the system. He killed one guy. He inspired some memes. He got a bunch of CEOs to increase their personal security. Big fucking deal.

    CEOs are fungible. Luigi killed one. His corporation replaced him, just like a broken part in a machine. Nothing changed and the world moved on.

    The broken health care industry will be fixed - if it's ever fixed - by government action. We need single payer. We need universal taxpayer-funded health care for all. And we're not going to get that by shooting CEOs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 5 months ago*

    And the shooting of that CEO made health insurance panic to the point that they approved almost every request for care for the first time ever.

    There are literally thousands, if not tens of thousands, that are alive today, thanks to the industries panic response to that shooting leading to mass approvals.

    Single Payer/Medicare for all is the ideal, but until we get there.. there is a clear mechanism to make the system better and act in the interests of patients.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago

    Insurance companies pay exorbitant amounts of money to tell politicians that single payer insurance isn’t a feasible option.

    Insurance companies lose a lot of money when they have to hire a new CEO because the other one died.

    For several months after the UHC CEO was shot, cases were denied significantly less often and were handled much faster than usual. This cost the insurance companies money too.

    In other words, if you’d like your vote for single-payer insurance to ever be heard, you have to quit down the really loud insurance companies and the only way to do that is to burn their pockets.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    let me emphasize here: killing people is wrong, even when the people are health care CEOs

    Hard disagree. It's wrong EXCEPT for them and others in their club. In their cases it is a moral imperative that all of us should be called to fulfill by our basic humanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago

    If we oppose terrorist acts, it is only because individual revenge does not satisfy us. The account we have to settle with the capitalist system is too great to be presented to some functionary called a minister. To learn to see all the crimes against humanity, all the indignities to which the human body and spirit are subjected, as the twisted outgrowths and expressions of the existing social system, in order to direct all our energies into a collective struggle against this system—that is the direction in which the burning desire for revenge can find its highest moral satisfaction.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -7 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I like how your response was sensible but got downvoted so much lol Every one calls for a Luigi but no one wants be a Luigi

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 5 months ago

    And frankly, a wave of Luigis would be actively harmful to the cause of fixing US health care. We had a wave of "propaganda of the deed" anarchist assassins and bombers in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Their "direct action" against members of European royalty discredited their cause in the public eye, and tainted not only them but peaceful anarchist movements beside them.

    And then an anarchist shot the wrong person and started World War I, showing that propaganda of the deed may not be able to make the world better, but it sure as hell can make it worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    You have a terminal diagnosis, regardless of your choice you will die. However if you pull the lever for a brief moment tens thousands of people will be given a better chance to live before the trolley returns to the mainline and the cycle begins again.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 51 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Heartbreaking: man diagnosed with UnitedHealthcare

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 48 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Luigi Mangione sacrificed so much for essentially so little, just heads on a hydra for a complacent populace still asleep at the wheel. What the fuck.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 83 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    I seem to recall they started paying more claims after a certain CEO of theirs was gunned down in the street.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    I'm not american (thankfully). But if I were, and I had a terminal illness, I'd suicide bomb a health insurance headquarters on my way out. Because fuck it...I'm dead anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] 10 points 5 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Greedy old fucks are the reason we are in this mess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago

    Capitalism is the reason we’re in this mess, and it incentivizes greed the same to everybody, regardless of age, race, or creed. Blaming any group besides the oligarchs just serves the oligarchs, and weakens the possibility we can change anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    it seems to be a generational thing. that generation which is old now isnt radicalized like some of the younger folks will be by that age.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Boomers are a bunch of coddled pussies that had the softest easy mode lives handed to them. They were pandered to as a generation and pulled the ladders up behind them at every step of the way. I hoped that as they died off as a voting block we would finally be able to make real progress as a society,. But the sociopaths they put in power know that they'll never win on policy, and so fascism and putting an end to democracy is their only way to avoid consequences for their crimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    The thought crossed my mind more than once when I was struggling for diagnosis as a very sick person and fighting insurance every step of the way.

    Cigna or the SSA, though? Decisions, decisions.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 27 points 5 months ago
    load more comments
    view more: next ›
    15 comments in c/luigimangione@lemmy.world view that post