This confirms one Luigi isn't enough
post
For-profit health care is grotesque
When you think about it, this applies to everything. Intrinsically, we, as a society, work to live our lives in the best conditions possible.
Healthcare is just another activity to better and further our living conditions. Now of course it is more important than a lot of other work (tbh mostly because so much work is bullshit nowadays) but why would it be immoral to profit off healthcare but totally okay to profit from agriculture or food distribution? To profit from the construction of homes? To profit from anything that is as fundamental and vital as healthcare?
And if it’s wrong to profit off the “important” stuff, it makes even less sense to be able to profit from the unimportant stuff.
The concept of profits is grotesque.
And to be clear, I’m not talking about reaping the rewards from your hard work, that is not the meaning of profits.
Careful,
That sounds a lot like the world would be better if we all worked together to improve things for everyone, regardless of their station in life...
Health care is especially terrible as a "market" because it doesn't work like other markets.
For example, if you have a 50% chance at something costing $100 happening, you'll probably make sure to have $100 available. If it's a 20% chance you probably have a plan, just in case. But, what if it's a 0.1% chance of something costing $100,000 you might take a gamble and not even bother with insurance. If you do get insurance, how do you calculate what is a reasonable price for that insurance? An extremely rare chance at an extremely expensive thing isn't the kind of calculation people do when they're shopping. The result, of course, is a lot of medical bankruptcies -- a phrase that simply doesn't exist in most countries.
Then there's the ridiculous idea of trying to shop around for health care. If you're having a heart attack, are you going to check to see which hospital has the best rates? Are you going to look up ambulance services online to see which one has the highest reviews? Even if it's something that isn't urgent, are you really capable of spending your money wisely to figure out which hospital offers the best price to performance ratio for a condition you can't pronounce, let alone understand? Markets only work when the shopper is informed, and it's very hard to be an expert on health care without being a health care professional (and even then, you might only really know your own specialty).
In addition, when you mix in preventative care, health insurance gets complicated. If you're healthier, you don't need as much insurance, which hurts the profits of insurance companies. On the other hand, once you do have insurance, they want to keep your premiums high without using their coverage, so they want you to live healthy... but not so much that you change or cancel your insurance. When health care is provided by the government, it's much simpler. It's best to keep everybody healthy and do as much preventative care as possible.
Finally, there's the issue of externalizing costs. If someone doesn't get insurance, they don't get left to die on the street. They get taken to a hospital and they get treated. Often, they're presented with a bill after that, which then can result in a medical bankruptcy. Who is ultimately on the hook? Taxpayers. It's just that responsible people who are able to afford medical insurance pay for their own care, but then through their taxes they also pay for health care for people who don't / can't get insurance. And, even though it's not financial, there's also the externalized cost of not getting treated.
Say you live in a city like NYC where everybody takes public transit. You really want to make sure that everyone else there showers, avoids too many perfumes, and doesn't take the train when they have a contagious illness! If someone doesn't have health insurance, so they can't go to the doctor when they get a cold, the flu or some kind of flesh-eating bacteria, they're much more likely to be on the train with that untreated illness with everyone else. In addition, things like a pandemic are much more likely to spread if someone can't afford to go to a doctor when they get sick. You're more likely to need health care in a country without universal health care simply because you're around people who don't have health care and might pass whatever they have to you.
Most economists agree that maybe a market is a great way to generate efficiency for things like pencils and tee shirts, but it's just not suitable for healthcare.
if a company put obscene profits before my treatment and I'm slowly dying in pain and fear then so are the ghouls who decided that money was more important than my treatment.
What have I got to lose?
Prison, I'll be dead before that happens.
Death sentence? I've already got one, thanks.
Damnation in hell? If there is a god and heaven then I'm pretty sure I'd be going up there if I take out a few billionaires. I have nothing to lose, they have everything.
The problem is that illnesses like these leave you with no energy. Hard to do much of anything.
I can only assume most of these people have spouses and kids, because that thought goes through my head too, or we'd definitely see more terminal vigilantism.
so did the Wermacht.
Everyone, even evil people, have kids. Their kids will probably grow up to be evil so what is your point exactly?
And most people can sympathize with the low level workers at the actual physical location, while the ceo and others at the top aren't necessarily easy to track and find.
I'd be curious to hear what the 'acceptable targets' are from people who casually talk about what they would do if they were in the situation described. I know I would hesitate at every single one. It's too easy to imagine how someone has been fucked over by our society's system, and the pain it will cause for them to die. Doesn't even matter if it's a rich fuck bastard like the asshole with two kids and an estranged wife that was popped the first time uhc got its teetee slapped.
⣿⣿⣿⢟⣭⣶⡶⠮⣝⠻⡿⠿⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⢣⣿⣿⣱⡙⣿⠗⣡⣾⣿⣿⣦⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⠿⡿⢿⣿⣿ ⣿⡇⣿⣿⣿⡽⣷⢠⡞⣱⠿⠛⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢿⣿⢟⣵⡟⣡⡾⢂⢻⣿ ⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⠣⠛⢈⣶⣧⢟⣎⢋⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢰⣷⣌⣾⣿⣾⣟⣼⡿⣸⣿ ⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⢇⡇⣾⣫⣭⠻⣼⡇⣣⣵⣶⣮⢻⣿⣷⢹⣿⢿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣱⣭⡝ ⣿⢃⣿⣿⣿⢨⣶⣿⣼⣿⡀⣻⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⢇⣿⣿⠚⣿⣾⣞⣽⣿⡿⣛⣋⣵ ⡇⣿⣿⣿⡿⣮⣛⣛⡻⣿⡶⣿⡿⠿⠿⠿⠋⢸⣿⣧⠻⣿⣿⣿⡿⢛⣼⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣜⡻⢏⣵⠮⣝⣻⣋⣾⡇⠀⠀⠀⠠⢤⢠⣿⡿⣱⣿⣮⣝⢛⣋⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⡜⣿⣵⣮⣿⠿⣿⣿⣷⡠⣾⣍⢸⠘⢫⣾⣿⣿⣿⢏⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣭⣭⣵⡜⣦⣙⢿⣿⣯⣽⢏⡄⣿⣿⣿⡿⣣⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⣛⢿⡇⠿⣙⡡⢩⣵⣆⣿⣇⢿⣿⣯⣜⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⠱⣶⣶⣶⣯⣼⣿⡎⢿⢟⣫⡰⣎⢿⢸⣿⣿⣦⣙⠿⣿⢧⡙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⡶⢐⣿⣟⣸⣷⢂⣴⣿⣿⣷⡝⣷⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣾⣿⡜⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⢃⣽⣿⣷⣿⣷⠻⣿⡿⢛⣵⡶⣨⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⡇⠿⢟⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⡶⣚⣬⣭⢱⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣾⣷⣶⢸⣿⣿⣿⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣟⣵⡸⣿⡿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢇⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠸⣿⣇⢽⣿⣷⣮⣝⡛⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡰⡹⣿⣮⣙⡿⠿⢿⣋⡄⣷⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣝⡪⢝⡛⠿⠿⠿⢟⢡⡟⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣬⣝⣫⣥⣾⢣⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠵⠾⠿⢿⣿⣿⡟⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⢑⣛⡻⢿⣶⣍⢿⣧⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢠⣶⣷⣮⡳⡝⣿⣷⡙⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣎⢿⣿⣿⠿⠸⡜⣿⣷⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⣾⣿⣿⣿⡜⡜⣿⡇⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡸⣿⣿⣿⣿⢰⢹⢇⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⣻⠿⠋⣪⣶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
Do a Luigi.
He didn't kill anyone.
Oh ffs.
Irrespective of the morality of Luigi's (alleged) actions (and let me emphasize here: killing people is wrong, even when the people are health care CEOs) he didn't do shit to change the system. He killed one guy. He inspired some memes. He got a bunch of CEOs to increase their personal security. Big fucking deal.
CEOs are fungible. Luigi killed one. His corporation replaced him, just like a broken part in a machine. Nothing changed and the world moved on.
The broken health care industry will be fixed - if it's ever fixed - by government action. We need single payer. We need universal taxpayer-funded health care for all. And we're not going to get that by shooting CEOs.
Luigi caused a wave of insurance companies to pause killing people for profit for a moment.
Nothing else has ever come close so far.
"Nothing changed."
Killing Brian Thompson had a real, if temporary, effect. They denied fewer claims.
And the shooting of that CEO made health insurance panic to the point that they approved almost every request for care for the first time ever.
There are literally thousands, if not tens of thousands, that are alive today, thanks to the industries panic response to that shooting leading to mass approvals.
Single Payer/Medicare for all is the ideal, but until we get there.. there is a clear mechanism to make the system better and act in the interests of patients.
Insurance companies pay exorbitant amounts of money to tell politicians that single payer insurance isn’t a feasible option.
Insurance companies lose a lot of money when they have to hire a new CEO because the other one died.
For several months after the UHC CEO was shot, cases were denied significantly less often and were handled much faster than usual. This cost the insurance companies money too.
In other words, if you’d like your vote for single-payer insurance to ever be heard, you have to quit down the really loud insurance companies and the only way to do that is to burn their pockets.
let me emphasize here: killing people is wrong, even when the people are health care CEOs
Hard disagree. It's wrong EXCEPT for them and others in their club. In their cases it is a moral imperative that all of us should be called to fulfill by our basic humanity.
If 1 Luigi doesn't work, 10 might do the job. Gotta throw enough at it for change to be permanent
If we oppose terrorist acts, it is only because individual revenge does not satisfy us. The account we have to settle with the capitalist system is too great to be presented to some functionary called a minister. To learn to see all the crimes against humanity, all the indignities to which the human body and spirit are subjected, as the twisted outgrowths and expressions of the existing social system, in order to direct all our energies into a collective struggle against this system—that is the direction in which the burning desire for revenge can find its highest moral satisfaction.
You don't know that we won't get universal health care by shooting the CEOs of health care companies.
This is just virtue signaling for capitalism and it's fucking lame.
One healthcare CEO is dead. UHC promptly replaces him and the system goes on as usual.
This is what Luigi did not know, it is near impossible to go after a corporation because its a machine with legal personhood!
I like how your response was sensible but got downvoted so much lol Every one calls for a Luigi but no one wants be a Luigi
And frankly, a wave of Luigis would be actively harmful to the cause of fixing US health care. We had a wave of "propaganda of the deed" anarchist assassins and bombers in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Their "direct action" against members of European royalty discredited their cause in the public eye, and tainted not only them but peaceful anarchist movements beside them.
And then an anarchist shot the wrong person and started World War I, showing that propaganda of the deed may not be able to make the world better, but it sure as hell can make it worse.
You have a terminal diagnosis, regardless of your choice you will die. However if you pull the lever for a brief moment tens thousands of people will be given a better chance to live before the trolley returns to the mainline and the cycle begins again.

Heartbreaking: man diagnosed with UnitedHealthcare
Luigi Mangione sacrificed so much for essentially so little, just heads on a hydra for a complacent populace still asleep at the wheel. What the fuck.
Once is a fluke, Twice is coincidence, three times is a trend. People notice trends.
Luigis story is still at the end of the first act. There is much to be written yet. He will become a highly influential person in American history.
I seem to recall they started paying more claims after a certain CEO of theirs was gunned down in the street.
And the investors got pretty pissed and demanded explanations afterwards.
I do not know why but the name Pavlov comes to mind..
I'm not american (thankfully). But if I were, and I had a terminal illness, I'd suicide bomb a health insurance headquarters on my way out. Because fuck it...I'm dead anyway.
Greedy old fucks are the reason we are in this mess.
it seems to be a generational thing. that generation which is old now isnt radicalized like some of the younger folks will be by that age.
Boomers are a bunch of coddled pussies that had the softest easy mode lives handed to them. They were pandered to as a generation and pulled the ladders up behind them at every step of the way. I hoped that as they died off as a voting block we would finally be able to make real progress as a society,. But the sociopaths they put in power know that they'll never win on policy, and so fascism and putting an end to democracy is their only way to avoid consequences for their crimes.
The thought crossed my mind more than once when I was struggling for diagnosis as a very sick person and fighting insurance every step of the way.
Cigna or the SSA, though? Decisions, decisions.
True. And then you dont have to worry about facing the cops/legal system cause y'all both be dead. And its better than dealing with an illness where the end result is death. Its on your own terms!





top 95 comments