top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 198 points 6 months ago (23 children)

And pin it to an inflation index maybe?

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 146 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Pin it to congressional compensation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago

    Only if that includes what they make from all sources. I could see them being bribed into reducing their pay and framing it as a selfless move for bucket-crab voters. Their new owners will make the investment back as soon as employee pay gets adjusted back down.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    I feel like many "cost of living" type laws need to be pinned together. For example the 401k yearly contribution limit and tax brackets should be defined as a multiple of minimum wage and not raised automatically each year without it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -62 points 6 months ago (11 children)

    It will definitely increase inflation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 59 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    That thing that's already gone up in the last 16+ years without the minimum wage doing up once?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    its performative for election, almost everywhere even in red states has raised the minimum wage since. remember one of the dem senators was introducing a bill about our flag, that amounts to nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago*

    Moving the goal posts for someone else doesn't negate the original comment's thesis. Raising minimum wage doesn't increase inflation, because as we've seen inflation has already gone up.

    Raising minimum wage (especially when tied to inflation and regional cost of living) often provides people with more spending power and work life balance. More money flows thru the economy while also allowing savings to increase. It can also cause other skilled labor jobs to see an increase in wages, and higher union attendance.

    Pay people better. Don't simp for the oligarchs.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Can't wait for this to not go anywhere and have several dems finger-wag for the next several years saying there's nothing they can do

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 37 points 6 months ago (10 children)

    I'm far more interested in a wage cap. Top level earner can't earn more than 10x the lowest level earner in the company. And a it doesn't matter the amount the wage is, if it isn't also tied to inflation as we'll be back fighting this fight again in short order if it isn't. That of course is take all of this at face value, and pretending it's not just theater.

    Though overall I would still prefer people rejecting the current business structures and making employee-owned businesses the new way. Go Pirate with the whole thing, everybody works for shares. Unions/Min. Wage are just compromises from realizing the true potential and pay of the working class.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago*

    I’m not an expert, but in that case, the company just splits into different sub-companies, no? The manufacturing arm would have a CEO paid in stocks and lower level workers still make nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    They just get non-salary benefits

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    That's where the cap needs to be. There will always be someone capable and willing to take the job without the enormous pay packet. Executive pay is the biggest scam ever created.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    No but you see if we don't offer 2 million a year AT LEAST we won't attract too talent!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    It’s such a wild lie that for some reason we are all supposed to take seriously.

    We all work at companies, the executives aren’t doing anything earth shattering. Most executives seem to be running the playbook of “give the customer less and charge them more to increase profits”. Wow, what innovation!

    I would love for someone to be able to point out some concrete brilliant ideas that an executive actually had that went from “vague bullshit” to execution without getting worked and reworked and reworked by a bunch of normal employees until it was actually viable.

    Steve Jobs made the iPhone, oh by himself, did he design the chips and write the software? Sure the vision is great, but for every iPhone there are a thousand CEOs that basically keep the lights on an already functioning company and raise the price. Oversee a rebrand. Go on the news and talk up their company.

    And they’d have you believe that that’s worth 300-400x what a regular employee.

    That every day they are coming in and providing more benefit than a worker does in an entire year. It’s the most obvious bullshit we’ve ever been asked to swallow

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 62 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    How DARE they Show voters what to Expect if PROGRESSIVES win a Majority!

    -People who will DISAPPEAR after the Midterms!

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    It's a great move and these are bills that need to be introduced frequently by dems right now. When people say "Yeah, but what can they do". This. This is what they can do. Introducing these messaging bills for republicans to vote again and then grand standing on how republicans won't do anything to help the working class.

    But dems must follow through. Minimum wage is the prefect example of where they should follow through. Attach it to a budget bill and when the parliamentarian says "not allowed" tell them to F off and push it through anyways. Just as the republicans have already done several times since they took control. Or blow up the filibuster. Either is an acceptable act for when dems get power. But they must deliver.

    If dems operate like they did in Biden term 1 or Obama term 1, they'll be sunk in 2032.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Pretty much. I'd love to see a party actually have balls. Ever when the Dems are in the majority they just circle jerk each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    We are fortunately seeing some of this with the gerrymandering bills. The absolute right messaging came from AOC when asked about the Virginia redistricting "We have a bill on the table to resolve this very problem but Republicans refuse to support it. If they hate this, they can feel free to vote to stop all gerrymandering".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    And it's still too low for anybody to live off of.

    https://livingwage.mit.edu/

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    It would double my wages. Anything is better than nothing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    Or turn you unemployed if employment at new wage isn't feasible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Do you really think that wages are low because higher wages would make the businesses fail? Wages are low because businesses have no incentive to raise them in an employer's market, that's it. They make higher margins and keep the difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Both cases are possible. Wages may be low because of surplus of working force on the market (hence no incentives to rise wages) or can be result of extremely low margins at the given industry.

    There can be tens of reasons why wages are poor, and rising minimum pay solves the issue only in some cases

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 6 months ago*

    Of course, there will be edge cases of industries that have not improved their margins over the years. But the fact that prices follow inflation, and wages do not, is enough information to generalise that businesses are just greedy as fuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Most of the past history of raising minimum wage/payroll taxes/employee benefits has been immediate outcry by business groups over how all business is going to go bankrupt/the sky is falling followed by change that a year later has business chugging along mostly the same as it was prior to their catastrophizing. It's not really surprising that employees who are able to spend more, spend more.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    We need a revolution to undo the damage of this administration. Democrats aren’t going to do shit and they’re all owned by the AIPAC Uniparty. This administration has been devastating to our future. Heads need to roll and I haven’t heard any democrats running on real accountability and a hard line against Israel

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    This is just for show and will end up going nowhere. If you think this has even a remote chance at changing the minimum wage then I have a bridge to sell you.

    We live in a time where democrats do nothing but act appalled, corporations control politics, corporations keep getting bigger, consumer prices increase year after year, healthcare premiums constantly cost more and employee benefits keep getting more expensive every year. What gives you the idea corporations are going to let politicians triple minimum wage? If that happens it will have a ripple effect where higher paying job positions will want a raise because why should someone making an entry level wage be paid the same as a job position with a lot more responsibility?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 128 points 6 months ago (19 children)

    They can't pass it. They don't have majority. Now watch as they win midterms and this gets forgotten completely.

    I mean, why not introduce this bill during any of the 4 years Biden was in office? Because it would've been actual policy, and they don't want that. This is political virtue signaling and nothing more.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    Now watch as they win midterms and this gets forgotten completely.

    "We can't pass it. We don't have supermajority."

    They get supermajority.

    "We can't pass it. We don't have the presidency"

    They win presidential elections.

    "We can't just pass it. It has to be bipartisan or it's bad for democracy"

    They lose midterms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago

    This is specifically an optics move because they can’t pass it. Make headlines about this and a few other progressive moves in the run up to November and gain votes from the “fell for it again” neolib crowd. Then “whoops, 1-3 democrat senators are just real sticks in the mud and won’t go for it so I guess we give up”. Then frustration from the base and they eventually kill whatever momentum because they prove that when it comes to action they almost always cave. Then the gop sweeps up and regresses as much as possible.

    Lieberman, sinema, manchin, now its fetterman. who will be the next “this 1-3 person group personally stops any and all progress in America for like a decade”. The ones that give those dumb neolibs ammo, because of course the party would do so much if it wasn’t for them and you just have to vote more so that the 1-3 person group can become a 3-5 person group

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    I mean, why not introduce this bill during any of the 4 years Biden was in office?

    bCoS wE dOn'T hAvE tHe mAjOrItY!!

    It's the usual and convenient excuse that Dems and their neoliberal fans love to use. As if not having a majority in either houses ever stopped Republicans! If the Dems are really serious as an opposition, which they aren't, then they have to make popular choices-- the kitchen table issues. And not only that, actually impeach and imprison Trump. I think America has to go under a fully fledged dictatorship for Americans to actually know when they see one; kinda like Brazil imprisoning Bolsonaro for trying to overthrow the election, and they are not letting up at all. Because Brazil suffered from decades of dictatorship. Americans did not indict and arrest Trump because they are still arguing whether or not he's a fascist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    Meanwhile Trump calls himself a fascist. Lol the country is filled with brainrot. Give them their reality tv or whatever the fuck it is my fellow Americans do all day. Sounds like a completely different language when I’m around my countrymen. Nothing going on in the head.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -4 points 6 months ago (12 children)

    So according to this there is absolutely nothing the Dems can do right now that would make you happy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    You seem surprised that this is how losing trust works. If people don't trust you will keep your promises, then it doesn't matter what you promise them.

    That being said, there are thing they can do that are not just virtue signalling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 6 months ago

    Democrats cry minimum wage increase if they win.

    Democrats cry legalized weed if they win.

    Democrats cry codified Roe v Wade if they win.

    Democrats cry ending the border wall if they win.

    And then don't do it when they win. And then get mad that people notice they got swindled.

    Republicans sell lies and promise torture, and they deliver that. Lies and torture.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    Drop all support for Iran war, pivot fundraising mechanisms away from Israeli influence, use bully pulpits and media to keep Epstein in the news cycle, direct more national funds to local DSA candidates, rotate gerontocracy out of party leadership, etc...

    I don't really mind them doing stuff like this too, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Yes because they are ineffective fucking liars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    At least Republicans are honest in his much they hate citizens at home and abroad. They don't mask their true intentions of the rich getting richer, the poor getting poorer, and enabling fascists.

    Democrats say they care until they get elected then say they need to work with the Republicans, then go hang out with them as they vote no on any bills that would inspire confirmce in the party or even system as a whole.

    And then their brainwashed fans get mad when you can notice patterns of intentional failure across every single election. Because losing elections to Republicans makes them more money. Winning elections just allows them to vaguely stop some things but never actually make meaningful change.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago*

    First day here?

    Most people here it seems would rather be worse off so they can continue to bitch endlessly than have anything good happen.

    Probably why half tell you voting is useless too even as primaries happen and Zoran is already in office doing things they should like.

    That notwithstanding I'd like to see polling on the matter. Right or wrong I would suspect a majority would be against such a drastic increase making this a loser of an issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    This is one of those ask for 100 so you can negotiate down to 50 kind of things isn't it? Or just a pretend attempt to look good when it's obviously rejected.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Democrats had all the leverage during the government shutdown and demanded nothing.

    They had the presidency and did nothing.

    But when they have no leverage they start introducing bills which they know will not pass.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago

    Introduce a bill for Socialized Healthcare too!!!

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago (7 children)

    Trump white house just posted " 2 kings" and these people still trying to pass fake bills?

    The people of the US need to woke up before it is too late if they want their democracy back, otherwise they can accept the new kingdom.

    I am not sure what he will call it, maybe just Trump

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 6 months ago (5 children)

    these people still trying to pass fake bills?

    Telling voters what to expect, if voters give Democrats power, is not "fake bills". What do you want, for Democrats to not tell voters what they would pass, if given power?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Telling voters what to expect, if voters give Democrats power

    After decades of lies, you'll have to excuse the skepticism of people who have been paying attention.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    They will be talking about this bill being shut down by Republicans for the next 20 years. They will talk about how improper it would be to reintroduce the bill after it was voted down. If they are ever in power they will point to this failed bill whenever the min wage comes up. They know that it will never pass, that's why it's being done now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Democrats have not had a filibuster-proof majority for almost 20 years.

    Sometimes I think Americans don't know how democracy works. You can't blame a party for not passing stuff, if you don't give that party the power to pass stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Democrats have not had a filibuster-proof majority for almost 20 years.

    Stop using the filibuster as an excuse for democrats blocking what you want blocked. They could have ended the filibuster for good with a simple majority any time they had one.

    Sometimes I think Americans don’t know how democracy works.

    Sometimes I wish the genocide wing could come up with a new way to gaslight people who say things they don't want to hear.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago

    Sometimes I think Americans don’t know how democracy works.

    As not an american I am almost certain you don't know how a real democracy works. A two party system is not democratic and majority are not healthy long term, if you want proof look at the us and the uk more recently. Coalitions are common and more democratic the world over.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›