top 65 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 1 year ago

I’d wait got the demonstration.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Gravity is how attracted I am to your mother

  • source
  • [–] 100 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Gravity is caused by the fact that everything in the universe sucks.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 1 year ago

    I've been reading a book about anti-gravity. I just can't put this thing down.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What do you mean no advances in the last 70 years?! In the last decade scientists detected gravity waves and imaged an actual real black hole. Also they've been steadily chipping at quantum gravity, give it a couple decades they'll get there.

    unless we cancel all the funding

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Gravity is just a side effect of the fundamental laziness of all things. Causality moves slower near mass, so it's kind of relaxing to move towards it. That's why everyone does it.

    PS: There is actually a SciShow Spacetime video about gravity being an emergent property instead of a fundamental force. And no I didn't get this from ChatGPT, I'm just that dumb when it comes to advanced physics haha.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Gravity was invented by Isaac Newton because he was invested in an airline.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It is what make it risky to jump from the Burj Kalifa, at least on the last meter.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    And yet, jumping from the Burj Khalifa at 1m off the ground is not very dangerous, so it's not the Burj Khalifa that's doing it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I find it quite marvellous that the universe contains unexplainable stuff like this, actually.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Everything we know about all space and time is technically just entirely made up by us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It came from the Labratory of The Mind, yes, the work was entirely metaphysical, but here's the wierd part. They used that mental experimentation and applied it to real life action, and it worked. It's like imagining you have a magic carpet for years then you stand on one and it starts flying. It began as imagination of the world around us, then when checked against reality. It works. Someone figured out that if something was passing around a sun. A planet, that it would dim the light at regular intervals. They checked, it did, that's the only reason we know there's planets outside our solar system. Someone checked the lumens of stars and found the data matched the theory. We use the color variations of stars in a similar way to detect more data. It's quite remarkable. A recent discovery in gravity is that while gravity is a ''constant'', it actually fluctuates from place to place, I'm not sure if anyone figured out why yet, but if and when, how they find out, will be their imagining a reason, imagining how to check, checking in real life, and getting the data on if it's right or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    57k a year is a decent salary if you live in the UK.

    A seasoned postdoc could expect to make 55K max. A professor a bit more.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago*

    57k€/year is a professional's salary in Italy.

    Average is 32k€

    With 57k€ you can afford to live comfortably, even get yourself a roomy flat, which is unusual for single individuals.

    *Exceptions may apply, see Milan or other big cities

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Mass go brrrr

  • source
  • [+] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Daily reminder that physicists contribute nothing to society /j

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    The far end might sound smart to you if you've never taken physics classes, but...

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Gravity is not what makes your body limp. It would just heavily influence a limp body. PhD my ass.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I mean for 57k a year it doesn't sound too bad tbh.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I could buy a house with that much ~

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • Isn’t this half the plot of Interstellar?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Gravity is a fundamental force just like electromagnetism (supposedly)

    Fundamental means it cannot be explained by being caused by something else.

    But then they say gravity is an effect caused by spacetime curvature and electromagnetism is caused by quantum phenomena.

    What is the cause for spacetime or quantummechanics? Idk but somehow they don't make it on the list of fundamental forces.

    Classical science, for all the good it did and does, is an unironic joke and if aliens knew about it they’d be laughing at us.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Fundamental means it cannot be explained by being caused by something else.

    Fundamental force means we expect a carrier particle to explain it (for gravity that’s the Graviton, although it hasn’t been detected yet).

    electromagnetism is caused by quantum phenomena.

    Not even remotely true.

    What is the cause for spacetime or quantummechanics? Idk but somehow they don't make it on the list of fundamental forces.

    Quantum mechanics is mostly that statistics is more complicated than we all thought . Seeking a cause for spacetime is interesting. It might be relevant to mention that there is a fundamental particle that imparts mass, which we call the Higgs Boson. I guess that could make mass and inertia something of a “fundamental force”.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Maybe i am wording it wrong. I did make the comment half joking but my current understanding of how magnetism really works, which my physics teacher was unable to answer has a chapter on wikipedia called Quantum-mechanical origin of magnetism

    I have no degrees in this stuff though, i just think about them recreationally.

    The carrier particle thing to describe a fundamental force is new to me, and honestly feels very counterintuitive to how i started to understand things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Quantum mechanical particles are very different things to classical ones.

    A slightly better way of thinking about them is quantised fields. Particles and waves are simplifications of the underlying effect. There is no classical equivalent to work with to this, so we try and understand it as particle-wave duality etc.

    In this case, a carrier particle is a (quantised) disturbance in the underlying field. If it has enough energy, it manifests as a physical particle. The higgs boson is an example of this. Below the required energy, you get virtual particles. These "borrow" energy, and so can never be seen directly, only inferred.

    By example. Photons are the carrier particle of electromagnetism. Give the field energy and you get photons (light). Without that energy, the photons are virtual. Existing only between the 2 acting entities.

    Different fields have different carrier particles. The photon is quite simple. It's effectiveness decays as 1/r^2 . The strong force carriers are more complex. They can emit more carrier particles, allowing the field to grow with distance rather than decay.

    To add more complexity. The various fields look to be aspects of the same field. At sufficient energies, they behave identically. We have figured out how to combine the electric, magnetic and weak fields. We have a handle on the strong field. The higgs field seems to also match into this. Gravity is a pain to study. We assume it should match in, but haven't managed to work out how yet.

    As for why the underlying field exists and follows the rules it does? We have no clue right now. The 'why' tends to follow the 'what', and we have yet to get a good handle on the 'what'.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    diamagnetism, paramagnetism and ferromagnetism can be fully explained only using quantum theory

    The magnetic properties of certain materials (e.g. why an unmagnetized piece of iron sticks to a magnet of either polarization), the way permanent magnets work, is best explained by quantum mechanics.

    However, the electromagnetic force itself doesn’t “arise” from quantum mechanics, and you can explain things like electromagnets and a lot of common electric circuits (until you need a transistor) quite well without considering quantum mechanics.

    Usually you take the “classical” formula for a force and to inform your quantum mechanical model of particles, and that’s how you can arrive at things like deriving how permanent magnets work with the help of w quantum mechanics.

    Generally, a lot of material science and chemistry is inherently quantum mechanical because the way atomic orbitals and molecular bonds work is heavily quantum mechanical.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Thanks for a well written reply.

    Though i still dont quite get this

    the electromagnetic force itself doesn’t “arise” from quantum mechanics, and you can explain things like electromagnets and a lot of common electric circuits (until you need a transistor) quite well without considering quantum mechanics.

    You seem to say if we can explain x without y then y cannot be fundamental to x.

    But can electromagnetism at all emerge if the quantum mechanics dont exist to emerge things like magnetism and some of the behavior of electrons?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    But can electromagnetism at all emerge if the quantum mechanics dont exist to emerge things like magnetism and some of the behavior of electrons?

    Well yeah, sure. Earlier you said something like "electromagentism is caused by quantum phenomena," but you can say that about almost every object and behavior in the universe! We don't have a theory of everything but the standard model and quantum field theory explain a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    “Caused” was not a good term but like i said i made that comment half jokingly

    I find that almost everything can be boiled down to just be a display of quantum mechanics which is why id place it as more fundamental.

    I cant really say that about gravity/spacetime though. Maybe someday we do find that it also is but for now it seems to be distinct.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    But can electromagnetism at all emerge if the quantum mechanics dont exist to emerge things like magnetism and some of the behavior of electrons?

    Short answer: yes.

    Technically the world can’t exist without all of its physics. But that’s kinda backwards from how you study it. Quantum mechanics isn’t “more correct” than classical mechanics, it’s more that it’s “more detailed”.

    If you want to model an electromagnet, an electronic circuit, light (in most macroscopic situations), how permanent magnets interact, electrostatic situations like how static electricity makes your hair stand up, lightning, the magnetic fields of celestial bodies like the Earth and Sun (they are big electromagnets), etc. you will use “classical” electromagnetism (meaning Newton’s mechanics, possibly with Einstein’s modifications, and Maxwell’s equations).

    If you want to model material science situations, like determining what material to make a diode or transistor out of, or if a given material can become a permanent magnet, you will likely need quantum mechanics to help model the interactions of electrons on the atomic scale. The section on Wikipedia you were looking at is about this kind of material science. You do this by combining the same “classical electromagnetic” equations with Schrödinger’s equations for quantum mechanics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    But then they say gravity is an effect caused by spacetime curvature and electromagnetism is caused by quantum phenomena. What is the cause for spacetime or quantummechanics? Idk but somehow they don't make it on the list of fundamental forces.

    I don't think we know enough about quantum mechanics to even make a guess, yet. I do know that the reason we wanted to find the Higgs Boson so much was because we thought it could help explain how things acquire mass, which could lead to figuring out antigravity. But then we found it and it wasn't doing what was originally thought. Or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Gravity is the opposite of comedy.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Babe wake up new physics copypasta just dropped

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago

    Lemmy: Hey, remember how reddit used to be so good?

    Satan: Yeah! Dang, I miss those days.

    Lemmy: I’ve got tons of what you don’t miss about reddit and little of what you do!

    Satan: Hooray!

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Same as any theory, but it's enough to make Christians freak out

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago

    Gravity is the net effect of all electromagnetic forces and quantum fluctuations causing the smallest bits of information at the smallest scales to drift together over “time” due to black hole natural selection aka cosmic natural selection.

    It is the universe using math to reproduce.

  • source