For those who aren't familiar with the term, it means believing something that probably shouldn't be believed, or being influenced to believe something that's not necessarily in your best interests.

top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 134 points 10 months ago (26 children)

There was a time I actually thought that Elon Musk wanted to help save the planet by making electric cars mainstream to displace fossil fuel vehicles, and by helping humanity return to space simply for the science and exploration value.

Musk's "some kind of pedo guy" comment about the diver that dismissed Musk's efforts with the cave children was the first WTF moment, but I wrote that off has him just having a bad day as he apologized later. Musk fighting the COVID lockdown was also more evidence that concerned me. This was all before Elon's embrace of trump and GOP Nazism, and long before Elon's double Nazi salute on national television.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago

    I always knew he was an arsehole, but I thought he was at least a like minded arsehole, when it came to saving the planet.

    The trapped kids incident also the first proper crack I noticed in his image. Now, I wouldn't touch anything of his with a 40' pole.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I tend to think at some point that was true, that Tesla was about saving the planet and SpaceX was about making humanity multiplanetary.

    It could be he was always a wretched creep and just really good at hiding it, but it seems to me that the wealth and power just ruined him. He wouldn't be the first person to fall in that trap.

    I'll append my confession here.

    I supported Ron Paul once upon a time. The non-interventionism appealed to me in the context of the Iraq war in particular, and the rights-based libertarian philosophy seemed sound. I was young.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    We must be twins!

    Elon is a classic tale of surrounding oneself with sycophants and descending into the madness of their own bullshit. I think he started with pure-ish intentions.

    I was a registered libertarian and a Ron Paul disciple. Easy trap to fall into as a relatively privileged white guy. Every self-described libertarian I meet now makes me ashamed of who I was then.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Never liked the guy in the first place, but what really sealed the deal was when I heard him talk about the stupid fucking Hyperloop, and then later when he built the even more stupid Loop system in Las Vegas.

    As a Swede who knows trains and remembers reading about Swissmetro, the Hyperloop system was not just a stupid idea, it was an old discredited stupid idea from the very start.

    As for the Loop system, the less said about it, the more time is left to laugh at it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Musk was already know for being a toxic asshole long before the pedo incident.

    His was already establishing himself as anti-labor, a terrible leader and an asshole who screamed at employees and fired employees in front of other employees.

    He only got into Tesla and spacex because he was able to establish himself as unremovable because every other company he had attempt to lead, fired his ass for being all of these things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Absolutely, but little of that information was common knowledge at the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I'm not sure common knowledge is a appropriate here, most of what you and I listed still isn't common knowledge.

    I recall all of this being covered and discussed. The main difference was the type of excuses being made becuase believe wanted to believe he was saving the world.

    There are definitely people who still believe. But there are now fewer people proclaiming it and the excuses are gone.

    Now the argument is if he's a Nazi or not. Few take his goals seriously, we're in some weird state where people are gaslighting themselves for various reasons. A big one is to protect the massive amount of money invested in his worthless companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago*

    Capitalist oligarchs are the ones who rule society, and so if there are problems in society, the fault ultimately comes back to them as they are the rulers. They, however, will never admit responsibility to anything, and so they will always seek to shift to blame to other people, but they are the ones who rule, so their blame must be shifted to the non-rulers, i.e. to regular people. Shifting the blame to all of regular people would be vastly unpopular, and so they instead pick out a subset of regular people to blame. Whether it is Jews, Somalis, transpeople, immigrants, etc, it is always the fault of some minority group of people who have no political power, and it is never the fault of those who control everything and are in the position of power to make all the decisions.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (16 children)

    You couldn't tell he was a maniac grifter? The fact that his money comes from family mines in South Africa and he didn't renounce it but built upon it didn't let you know he was a villain? 😕

    PS: Weird post to downdoot. Explain yourselves, you cowards, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 10 months ago* (5 children)

    I had no idea he came from SA with wealth from mining until after I figured out he was full of shit and and absolute dickhead, only after that did I realize where it all started.

    So don't blame people for not knowing what you knew at the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    First of all, where's the blame? Don't get too emotional on me. Secondly, that's like the easiest and quickest Google research you could've done, lol. Finally, does anyone who isn't in the spectrum even have to Google anything related to him? The insanity and depravity was palpable, just like with Milei and Trump and the others. But if you are, then the little Google search would be absolutely necessary before you start praising him as if he's some messiah and not just another selfish capitalist amoral prick. Haven't y'all had enough experience with these folks to recognise it?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    This is where you put the blame in your comment:

    The fact that his money comes from family mines in South Africa and he didn't renounce it but built upon it didn't let you know he was a villain?

    This isn't even general knowledge these days, and has only started spreading in the last few years, you acted as if everyone knew it from day one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    PS: Weird post to downdoot. Explain yourselves, you cowards, lol.

    You're not wrong, you're just being a dick about it in a thread that is literally about the time one drank the Kool Aid.

    Criticising people that have reflected their previous choices/views and are acting different now is unnecessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

    Where's the criticism? Stop having an emotional reaction to my actual bewilderment ("you couldn't tell...") and just explain it to me (or don't!). 🙃

    Had I said something like "lol you fucking incompetent moron, you smoothbrain fucks", I'd get it, certainly. But I didn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

    You asked people to explain. People explained that you're coming across as a dick, in a thread explicitly about regrettable, gullible moments. I don't know what you're having a problem with here but it seems like you're the one having an emotional reaction, calling people cowards and refusing to hear people's explanations.

    I think the reason your initial comment comes across hostile is because of the way it's written (chaining questions), and the way you're asking things that have an obvious answer.

    However, you didn't write anything explicitly hostile. It's a question that could come across either way, and if you genuinely had no mocking or hostile intent I would have suggested rereading and rewording your comment to make that clearer, as it's tough to interpret that kind of thing through text. I've totally left comments that read hostile when I didn't intend it to, it just happens sometimes! 🤷‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Now this is a proper reply. Fair enough. I wasn't being hostile, more like 🤔😔, certainly not too positive. It's annoying that people can be this blind, it's a big reason why the world is so shit and why the West cranks and exports villains who are loved locally... it's triggering, for lack of a better word.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    He was a big figure before the Internet became what it is today. We only saw him through headlines, that he probably paid to have embellished in a positive light.

    Before he started going on twitter and we all saw what a prick he was, he was Mr. Most-Likely-To-Be-Iron-Man-IRL. It's a shame really.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 69 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    Divisive propaganda got me to vote for Jill Stein in 2016. I would still assert that Clinton was an awful candidate, but I should have voted for her.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I fell for this, too. I felt like I needed to "punish" the democrats for corruption that blocked Bernie from what should have been rightfully his. It felt like the democrats were doing election fraud. I thought Trump wouldn't possibly win in my state anyway. Oh how naive I was.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Even if all Stein votes went to Clinton, she still would've lost, so the country ultimately followed your strategy of not voting third party. You need to take responsibility as the current situation we are in is the result of your endorsed strategy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    I mean, not really. You just said it wouldn't have made a difference if I voted for Stein vs Hillary. I got several lifelong Republicans to change their voter registration to Democrat to vote for Bernie. I do not endorse voting 3rd party anymore. I used to think you should vote your conscience no matter what. I believed in a free and fair democracy. Now I think you should strategize even if the democrats suck too.

    I do take responsibility for being a dumb young 20s person falling for what I now think was Russian propaganda, but Trump winning a second time had nothing to do with me. That's on people who didn't vote at all in 2024.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    I mean, not really. You just said it wouldn’t have made a difference if I voted for Stein vs Hillary.

    I am not talking about "you." I have no idea who you are. I am talking about your strategy. People followed your strategy and it got us into the bind we are currently in.

    I got several lifelong Republicans to change their voter registration to Democrat to vote for Bernie. I do not endorse voting 3rd party anymore. I used to think you should vote your conscience no matter what. I believed in a free and fair democracy. Now I think you should strategize even if the democrats suck too.

    And people have followed your strategy and it failed. It turns out that having no principles and endorsing warmongering fascists who promise nothing to their constituents will just make you lose the election.

    The point of voting third party isn't even necessarily some expectation that the third party wins, but to pressure the Democrats to actually stand for something so that the Democrats will win. Your strategy of "vote blue no matter who" always leads to the Democrats not only losing, but also shifting farther to the right before losing because they have no incentive to have any populist principles, and then this hands the reigns into an even farther right Republican administration.

    Again, Trump's victory is a result of your strategy. This administration is yours. Own it.

    People did not vote third party in this election in significant numbers enough for it to sway the election. People did not do so last election either. People have been consistently following the "vote blue no matter who" for decades now, with the last time there was any serious backing for a third party was back in the 2000 election.

    I do take responsibility for being a dumb young 20s person falling for what I now think was Russian propaganda

    Russiagate in 2025 🤦‍♀️

    Yeah, I'm sure it was those few hundred dollars in ads on Facebook and not open support for an industrial scale holocaust, an out of control cost of living crisis, shifting towards being jingoistic and running on wanting to massively ramp up military spending and constantly attacking Trump from the right saying he isn't hawking on the border enough.

    Yeah yeah, I'm sure none of those had to do with people not being very inspired to vote for the Democrats. Democrats aren't popular because of a few Facebook ads, not because they've done anything wrong! Sure sure.

    but Trump winning a second time had nothing to do with me.

    You take no responsibility for anything. You just constantly want to shift the blame elsewhere. Your failures are all secretly the fault of Russia or of other poor and struggling Americans. The problem is never you or your beloved fascist politicians. You do not have the level of maturity needed to admit when your strategy has failed.

    That’s on people who didn’t vote at all in 2024.

    It is the responsibility of a party to have a strategy to attract voters. Saying "we should have a strategy that appeals to no one" and then losing the election and blaming people for not voting for you just reveals that you, at the end of the day, genuinely do not care about the outcome of the election. This is why you try to shift the blame of your own failures onto other poor and struggling Americans.

    I want the Democrats to appeal to non-voters so they will actually win. You want the Democrats to appeal to no one and then just shame non-voters as bad people for not mindlessly your beloved fascist politician, because you ultimately, at the end of the day, don't actually even care if the Democrats win or lose as politics is just a game to you. I want a strategy that actually wins elections. Your strategy has been the dominant one for decades now. As the old saying goes, insanity is trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    What was the intent of your vote? To voice displeasure with both candidates?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    That, to demonstrate to the Democratic party that I don't want to support them if they actively fight against my policy goals, and to help develop a viable third party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    Wish voting third party could accomplish that. I want the same things. Thank you for sharing.

    Shocked that a vast majority of this country doesn’t agree to exclusively vote for candidates whose primary policy position is electoral reform.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I was raised insane and religious and ended up listening to Alex Jones every day for a year or two in highschool. I was also insufferable about it.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    How did you escape? Because it seems a lot of people can't

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    No useful tips for deprogramming, I'm afraid. The two most critical things was an honest desire to know the truth / challenge my own beliefs, and learning empathy which helped a bunch. The rest was part of a larger shift in my life.

    (Edit: Not being entirely isolated in the crazy is probably the most reproducible aspect. Gaining contact with people outside of that sphere was important, though my motivations can't be replicated...)

    Paragraph 2 from the long version AKA my life story and shift to the left

    As a teen I was big into Alex Jones and conspiracy theories to the point of losing friends before it was cool (pre-maga). Unfortunately for him, I took his advice and “did my own researcher”; becoming more disillusioned with his bullshit the more I learned. For one example, there was a great analysis paper on the sorts of energies and temperatures involved in 9-11, whose models perfectly matched the real world structural damage: no thermite or lasers needed. I bought into the h1n1 vax hoax from Ventura after I had the shot and thought I’d be crippled when then turned on the signal or whatever… But I wasn’t. Same with the Fukushima disaster Alex fearmongered about; turns out we’re not in a radioactive apocalypse. Retrospectively: he had a terrible track record for predictions.

    But I also fell in love with a cute lefty boy around the tail end of my Alex Jones phase of life, which certainly spurred a lot of change and self-reflection... I had already started cutting through a teeny tiny bit of the bullshit myself, but that really pushed things along and on a grander scale.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Have you ever listened to the podcast Knowledge Fight?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    No I haven't. Since AJ, the only podcast I've watched has been LinusTechTips' WANshow (and Level1Techs [prev. Tek Syndicate] very rarely). I've never really been big into the format.

    I watch Belle of the Ranch for political commentary, news, and anything that matters. Vaush, SomeMoreNews, and a bunch of urbanist channels like Not Just Bikes for pol / pol-adjacent entertainment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I’m also a big fan of Some More News!

    If hearing Alex Jones again wouldn’t be upsetting to you, I really recommend Knowledge Fight. They cut clips from Info Wars and dive into the reality of the stories behind his nonsense and break down the propaganda. They actually helped the lawyers for the Sandy Hook families. And the Formulaic Objections episodes where they listen to the depositions of the Info Wars employees are really good

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 65 points 10 months ago (21 children)

    I believed the USA was a liberal democracy full of concerned citizens. I also had faith in the financial system at one point!

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [+] -29 points 10 months ago (18 children)
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    You say socialist like it's a bad thing and it screams "I'm ignorant."

    If you hate socialism stop using the things socialism provides you. Mail, paved roads, power and water delivered to your house, fire and police, education, etc. Socialism is a big part of why our lives are so decent despite the capitalist hellscape the billionaires are pushing. They've lied to you that social programs are why your taxes are so high; they're high because the wealthiest among us aren't paying a fair share.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    All of that is infact socialism. Taxing individuals and creating community services. It’s like the core tenant or our education system which is socialist, even if it failed to teach you that. It’s the core tenant of social security and Medicare. Those third rail policies that everyone loves? It’s socialism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (7 children)

    None of that is socialism but alright I guess every country in the world is socialist so you've got what you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)

    What’s the purpose of social security? A state run program to redistribute money from the working to the non working? A social safety net to protect vulnerable citizens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    So what is the difference between that and communism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Idk what’s the difference between Donald trump taking 10% of intel randomly and communism lol. Is seizing the means of production on behalf of the state a capitalism?

    Can you describe capitalism for me before I describe communism?

    Communism is a classless society imagined by Karl Marx and Circle jerked over for over a century by nerds and dictators who killed nerds alike. It’s also a strawman for people who don’t understand communism depending on who you ask. Now can you explain capitalism to me? I can understand being ignorant of communism, but I can’t understand being ignorant of the system that you live under, so could you please describe the basic economic system that you prescribed to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    No I'm genuinely asking for your answer on this because none of your definitions line up or make sense. You realised that your definition of socialism is so wide reaching that it covers communism as well as capitalism.

    Trump seizing 10% of Intel

    That is a communist move. Trump is closer to a communist dictator than he to a democratic liberal leader.

    Definition of capitalism. An economic system where most of the capital is owned privately and distributed through markets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I apologize. I thought you were trolling or worse. Yea I generally think socialism is any government run program that redistributes resources for social goals. Like educating children and providing care for the infirm.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    Socialism is when we say grandma shouldn’t die of poverty; communism is when we say eat the rich because grand ma died of starvations. Socialism can exist under a capitalist economy while communism cannot. Hope this helps, try reading a book sometime. Or using google maybe idk.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Hahah socialism. Like subsidies for farmers who grow corn for ethanol? Or like subsidies for Amazon warehouses. Or should we only do socialism and when banks gamble to hard and collapse? Or socialism like getting a government/military jobs to avoid poverty?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 23 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I ran 5 km every day and ate very low fat, mostly plants. Ended up with non alcoholic fatty liver.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Used to believe that humanity would inherently self-improve, especially the more easily information became accessible.

    People couldn't read and write at first, and didn't know much about the world, and now we have instant communication and access to vast repositories of knowledge.

    I believed that people were naturally curious, and wanted to learn and figure things out. Education systems sucked, but with improvement it could foster that curiosity in everyone!

    Turns out that was incredibly naive. Humans have an inherent ego that tries to make themselves more than reality. Their problems are more real than another's. Their inconveniences are more important than anything bigger-picture. I thought religion were old dinosaur structures of primitive belief systems that lasted for too long, but humans will literally make shit up or believe in some made up shit from someone else if it helps them ignore the inconveniences of reality.

    COVID-19 really helped sink that in.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago

    Oh man. Yeah, I remember in middle school reading about WW1, WW2, Vietnam, the Civil War (USA) and thinking that thank god we're smart enough to be past that.

    Yes, also, COVID killed any hope I had left. I remember before the pandemic thinking that if aliens landed all of humanity's petty bickering would end once we had something that united us all, and when COVID hit I thought "this is it, we have no choice but to come together as humans and face a challenge"...holy shit was I wrong. In the years since the pandemic I've had to actively try to forget most of what happened for my own sanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Humans are smart.

    But this isn't our natural habitat. Its a laboratory and we are the lab rats.

    Can you judge an animal's intelligence if they are in a controlled environment and manipulated by mad scientists? (mad scientist = the 1%)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 45 points 10 months ago (9 children)

    Elon Musk in his early days. He was fresh, convincing and his ideas sounded good. It turns out they sounded a bit too good. With hindsight he really is the world greatest con-man. Why this still goes on its beyond me, though.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago

    I knew of Tesla and SpaceX and I'd vaguely heard of him but didn't really care so I wrote him off as another rich asshole immediately. Then I had some friends raving about him going to Mars and saving the world. I almost bought in but within a few weeks of that happening he called the guys who rescued the kids trapped in a cave a pedo just because he couldn't use his sub. That started my hatred of the man.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 6 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago* (4 children)

    wild to think that whole house of cards of his collapsed because his PR person wanted a raise and being the greedy little ratfuck he is he refused.

    cleanly they earned it

    kimd of makes me wonder who all else out there is a complete piece of shit but we just don't know/realize it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Never heard about this. Do you have a source I can get some further reading on this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    don't have any links off the top of my head but it should be easy enough to find.

    it could just all be coincidence but the timing of public-facing downfall and that event seems too good to be true imo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (1 child)

    Ok I'll have a look. Thnx for the interesting info

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I thought the Mueller report was going to be a big bombshell and end a bunch of shit but it did almost less than nothing.

    I thought "loose change" had more merit than it did when it came out. still sus on wtc7.

    i thought 'What the bleed do we know" had more merit when I first saw it.

    so there, I admit being human and getting swept up in confirmation bias, etc.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    If it makes you feel better, political bombshells don't work anymore because nothing will ever phase the Republican voters enough to turn against their own politicians. Nothing, ever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    they had fox, newsmaxs, OAN, russian backed grifters to astroturf with propaganda to, hypernormalize it. its very effective with conservatives, because they are terminally drama/emotionally stunted driven people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Ancient Aliens.

    It was about 2002. I was 20.

    Yes the internet existed back then but it just wasn't so pervasive. As in I didn't own a computer and that wasn't uncommon.

    I bought a second hand book called Ancient Astronauts (?) by a guy called Erik Von Daniken. He's absolutely the 80s / 90s version of Graham Hancock. All the same pseudoscience strategies to popularise a bullshit theory.

    I think I could best be described as a troubled young man. I drank heavily, smoked weed every day, party drugs on the weekend. When I was 18 I had left my home and a deeply religious background. I guess I was looking for some kind of secret arcane understanding of the world that wasn't religion.

    I honestly don't know what I would have said if someone had have asked me directly - do you really believe that extra terrestrial beings have visited the earth in it's distant history. Like I don't know if I really truly believed it. I sure loved thinking about it though.

    I changed my position over a decade or so. I went to uni, got a degree, started my career in accounting. Completely un-related to science or history or anthropology but, I certainly realised that people who have spent a lifetime studying to become experts in their field really know what they're talking about. Like it's just stupid to suggest that "every real archaologist in the world is stupid and only I can explain earth's real history".

    I still am a weird guy but I don't believe in weird stuff like that anymore.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    Conspiracy nonsense is one of my favorite hobbies to the point where I read your first sentence and immediately thought 'Erich von Däniken!' and two sentences later he is mentioned, coincidence, I think not!

    He is one of my favorite weirdos, humans developing through aliens fucking apes? That's exactly the kind of freaky shit I'm in to chef's kiss

    Hollow earth is also great.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›