Better do it like the old Greeks: they voted twice. Once to get someone into office, and once at the end of the term whether to banish him or not.
post
That’s how instant runoff voting works (assuming you’re still starting with a small list of candidates).
Elections would take 10,000 years.
Depending on the voting system, that's basically just a rhetorical reframing.
I guess it would lead to politicians being even more sycophantic before elections to not exhibit any possible trait that could be seen as negative.
Not a good system, I think.
They already do that.
As others said, the practical interpretation of OP's idea would be that you just vote down all the candidates you don't want to win. Then the least-disliked (read: most moderate and inoffensive) candidate wins. Good. This is what should happen. Government should be moderate and boring. In an ideal world the government would never be in the news because things are going well and nothing of note is happening.
Or just let them compete on an island which gets smaller and smaller until there's just one person standing!
Would you get the least worst candidate? I would try it.
Another scheme is random selection of a citizen, like jury duty. You have professional civil servants but the leader is randomly selected and if the leader is doing badly it triggers a new selection.
Do we send the candidates off to a desert island to survive for a couple weeks while this is happening?
My solution to politics: if 50,000 people vote that we should execute you, we execute you. Pretty soon there would be no politicians left.
You realize that most people dislike taxes more than they like functioning schools, right?
As a sudden change that does something. I'm less excited about the steady state. I think nobody does anything publicly that could get attention, because being known gets you killed with surprisingly high probability.
Honestly with how much of a reality show the US already is, I'm surprised this hasn't been tried and televised lol
all 32 comments