all 69 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 1 year ago

The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) said Roberts is speaking to cabinet about trade issues because he knows the Trump administration's playbook.

And what exactly is this guy's motivation to share that information with us? Just out of the kindness of his heart? The guy quoted in this very article as saying the US was in the midst of a,

"second American Revolution, which will remain bloodless if the left allows it to be."

Yeah, that's a stand up guy who I definitely trust to tell me the truth. Come the fuck on.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) said Roberts is speaking to cabinet about trade issues because he knows the Trump administration's playbook.

    He knows that playbook because he was in the room when it was written.

    I hope this meeting is not what it looks like on the surface.

    There is no part of the heritage foundation agenda that I want to have any influence in Canada.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    It already does have influence in Canada, PP and Alberta are the biggest threats because of this.

    If taking to this jagoff makes it easier to deal with The Trump administration, that's a good thing. Forewarned is forearmed

    I'm fortunately that's the rose coloured glasses version of this meeting though.

    I hate this timeline

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    If Carney fucks us, I’m going to be rightly fucking pissed.

    If this is a meeting for discovery, OK. If this is a meeting to engage them more, fuck off.

    This closed door meeting better have some public relay once it’s over a good solid cabinet member can leak the details.

    This does not sit well with me.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Reminds me of that satire post Larry David did when Bill Mahar thought it was a good idea to have dinner with Trump

    https://www.rsn.org/001/my-dinner-with-adolf.html

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Link wasnt working so here's the article (only tried to enter HTTPS:// for some reason)

    My Dinner With Adolf

    Larry David / The New York Times

    4 - 5 minutes

    Imagine my surprise when in the spring of 1939 a letter arrived at my house inviting me to dinner at the Old Chancellery with the world’s most reviled man, Adolf Hitler. I had been a vocal critic of his on the radio from the beginning, pretty much predicting everything he was going to do on the road to dictatorship. No one I knew encouraged me to go. “He’s Hitler. He’s a monster.” But eventually I concluded that hate gets us nowhere. I knew I couldn’t change his views, but we need to talk to the other side — even if it has invaded and annexed other countries and committed unspeakable crimes against humanity.

    Two weeks later, I found myself on the front steps of the Old Chancellery and was led into an opulent living room, where a few of the Führer’s most vocal supporters had gathered: Himmler, Göring, Leni Riefenstahl and the Duke of Windsor, formerly King Edward VIII. We talked about some of the beautiful art on the walls that had been taken from the homes of Jews. But our conversation ended abruptly when we heard loud footsteps coming down the hallway. Everyone stiffened as Hitler entered the room.

    He was wearing a tan suit with a swastika armband and gave me an enthusiastic greeting that caught me off guard. Frankly, it was a warmer greeting than I normally get from my parents, and it was accompanied by a slap on my back. I found the whole thing quite disarming. I joked that I was surprised to see him in a tan suit because if he wore that out, it would be perceived as un-Führer-like. That amused him to no end, and I realized I’d never seen him laugh before. Suddenly he seemed so human. Here I was, prepared to meet Hitler, the one I’d seen and heard — the public Hitler. But this private Hitler was a completely different animal. And oddly enough, this one seemed more authentic, like this was the real Hitler. The whole thing had my head spinning.

    He said he was starving and led us into the dining room, where he gestured for me to sit next to him. Göring immediately grabbed a slice of pumpernickel, whereupon Hitler turned to me, gave me an eye roll, then whispered, “Watch. He’ll be done with his entire meal before you’ve taken two bites.” That one really got me. Göring, with his mouth full, asked what was so funny, and Hitler said, “I was just telling him about the time my dog had diarrhea in the Reichstag.” Göring remembered. How could he forget? He loved that story, especially the part where Hitler shot the dog before it got back into the car. Then a beaming Hitler said, “Hey, if I can kill Jews, Gypsies and homosexuals, I can certainly kill a dog!” That perhaps got the biggest laugh of the night — and believe me, there were plenty.

    But it wasn’t just a one-way street, with the Führer dominating the conversation. He was quite inquisitive and asked me a lot of questions about myself. I told him I had just gone through a brutal breakup with my girlfriend because every time I went someplace without her, she was always insistent that I tell her everything I talked about. I can’t stand having to remember every detail of every conversation. Hitler said he could relate — he hated that, too. “What am I, a secretary?” He advised me it was best not to have any more contact with her or else I’d be right back where I started and eventually I’d have to go through the whole thing all over again. I said it must be easy for a dictator to go through a breakup. He said, “You’d be surprised. There are still feelings.” Hmm … there are still feelings. That really resonated with me. We’re not that different, after all. I thought that if only the world could see this side of him, people might have a completely different opinion.

    Two hours later, the dinner was over, and the Führer escorted me to the door. “I am so glad to have met you. I hope I’m no longer the monster you thought I was.” “I must say, mein Führer, I’m so thankful I came. Although we disagree on many issues, it doesn’t mean that we have to hate each other.” And with that, I gave him a Nazi salute and walked out into the night.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    If this is a meeting for discovery, OK.

    Ostensibly, that's why:

    The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) said Roberts is speaking to cabinet about trade issues because he knows the Trump administration's playbook.

    Roberts's book Dawn's Early Light: Taking Back Washington to Save America includes a foreword written by U.S. Vice-President JD Vance

    The PMO added it would be beneficial for cabinet to hear Roberts's perspective and understand the White House's priorities as the government prepares for the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) review next year.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    He's probably meeting them as flattery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Well, unless there is more to it for Canada other than a "good conversation" it's a fucking waste and a spit in the eye.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    If it keeps them from doing anything worse for a little while, I fully appreciate Carney sitting through a speech by another blowhard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    This isn't just another blowhard. This dude is from the heritage foundation and was a key figure in writing project 2025.

    This asshole is on the same level as Geobbels and the like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Honestly, I think I might characterise Goebbels, propaganda minister, as a blowhard as well.

    How much we don't like a particular blowhard is kind of irrelevant here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Even a top Trudeau advisor is openly telling the press that it's "mind-boggling" he was invited. At least 2 MPs and a Liberal party staffer are also speaking out. It's indefensible, and I have to seriously question the motives and principles of anyone trying to defend it.

    https://sh.itjust.works/post/45477858

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Oh no, I wouldn't want you to seriously question me! /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's all just a joke, right? Inviting the fascists into your cabinet meeting is really funny, hahaha /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Geezus. Why do you immediately think the worst? Maybe Carney wants to put this BS to bed. Is it so hard to believe he’s not in cahoots?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    I don't like that it's closed doors, but I question the framing of this article.

    Like clearly Canada needs to keep negotiations with the USA open and Carney is not in control of who Trump authorizes to speak for the USA.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Canada needs to keep negotiations with the USA open

    I don’t want that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They need time. Canada IS setting up trade with other nations. It’s not going to happen overnight...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Our exports dropped 19% in Q2 this year. Diversifying 1/5th of our trade will take long enough that the responsible thing to do is salvage what trade we can from the USA in the interim.

    There's a world of difference between buyCanadian and wefuckingneedourexportsguys.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    “Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer”. Carney has a long and distinguished career in finance and politics. He is in complete control with whom he meets. Carney is buying time and setting up alternate trade outside of USSA. This takes time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I was thinking United SchutzStaffel of America.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    He's in complete control of who he meets, but the way the article headline is framing it is irresponsible IMO.

    As you said, Carney is setting up alternative trade partners. I'd assume part of his diversification strategy is to identify what aspects of trade specifically we need to divert away from the US due to Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Can you elaborate on the "authorize" portion? This is all that's in the article regarding why the person is speaking at the event.

    Roberts is speaking to Carney's cabinet during a session dubbed "establishing a new economic and security relationship with the U.S." They will also hear from Kevin Rudd, Australia's ambassador to the U.S., during the session.

    The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) said Roberts is speaking to cabinet about trade issues because he knows the Trump administration's playbook.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Carney meeting with the nazis

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Oh, and I suppose the enemy is going to give you good info?

    This is nonsense. You don't sit down with fascists. Easiest rule. This is unconscionable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Of course you don't take anything they say at face value, but keeping track of what they emphasise, what they downplay, and how that changes over time can give you some notion of where their weak points are. Don't listen to what they're saying, listen to what they're trying to hide.

    In the end, though, what we want is to keep the Americans talking, rather than shooting at us. Each diplomatic conversation buys time until they either course-correct or collapse into civil war. And if that requires some MPs to sit through a dramatic reading of Trump partisan trash while not visibly rolling their eyes, well, they're being paid well enough for it. There's a big difference between keeping someone talking and letting yourself be persuaded by them. (People like Danielle Smith don't need to be persuaded over to the evil side—they were on that side from the get-go.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Theil is behind project 2025 and is the child rapist trumps puppeteer. There is no reason in the universe to invite that vile scum. If he does I am writing Carney off 100%.

    Fuck.

    Edit typo

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    its clearly a big brain ambush move and they'll take him as ransom

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Y’know you keep giving them handouts, they’ll keep coming back.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The next person that says "strategic voting" within earshot is getting knocked out, I swear to god. This is so beyond the pale

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Strategic voting.

    Whatever alternative you're thinking of is unworkable. Nor am I convinced any other party would do something different, given our vulnerable position, except to maybe genuinely entertain further integration.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "The best thing you can do is capitulate, it'll totally work against the bully President this time"

    There, that's what his speech will be.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    And hopefully they nod and smile, and he goes back and reports they've contained us so we can buy some more time.

    Everyone's getting their pitchforks out, but I'd be doing the exact same thing as PM right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Capitulating Capitalist Carney will always put monied interests above those of the people. Once a banker, always a banker.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Maybe he'll get shot and killed?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah the guy who ran on opposing Trump and supporting workers who immediately folded to Trump and ratfucked the flight attendants definitely deserves the benefit of the doubt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    I'll join you in that chant when I'm convinced it's not a gross oversimplification that ignores developments not covered in the media.

    As much as I'd rather socialist domestic policies, I acknowledge that in realpolitik terms we don't exist in a void or have the luxury of ignoring the influence of neo-fascists like the USA.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    You: Maybe we can sit down with fascists just a bit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    You are acting like they are signing a weapons deal.

    Do you want Canada to close its US embassies too?

    Real life isn't black and white.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Lol yeah you're right, it's cool, just inviting the author of a document so heinous that even Donald fucking Trump had to distance himself from it in order to get elected, totally normal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Damn, glad he distanced himself, wouldn't want them to think Donny has bad friends.

    Wtf are you even saying? Lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    When asked during the campaign if Project 2025 was his agenda, Trump said he had never heard of it. This was widely reported, so I'm not sure why you're confused about what I wrote

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    there’s two things that EVERYONE should be able to recognize about Trump, but really just boils down to one simple fact : he always says the opposite of what is true.

    • when he says “nobody knows more about this than me,” what he REALLY means is “i am completely clueless about this subject”

    • when he says “never heard of it,” he is VERY involved.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 10 comments in c/canada@lemmy.ca view that post
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    Absolutely disgusting

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    What the frick

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Revolting.

    Fucking disgusting. We are responding by a clear and present need to learn to stand on our own two feet as a nation by trying even harder to gargle America's bloody cock.

    Fucking sycophantic cowards.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Who invited the tech bros to an adult meeting?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Luckily this meeting didn't happen. I was going to reserve my judgement until after, when the PMO noted their takeaways of the conversation.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I am glad to see that this fuck wad is not being invited into Canada anymore, I just wish Carney had the gonads to say the invitation was rescinded rather than giving the fuck wad the ability to say he was not coming on his own accord.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "Listening" is not approval. The government should want to understand the threat better. Carney is being smart here by wanting to understand the situation he has to deal with.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)