tldr: Australian pressure group Collective Shout has claimed responsibility for the recent Itch.io and Steam developments that have seen the platforms change how they deal with - and in some cases remove - NSFW games and content from their respective platforms.

The group had already been closely linked with the situation, which has seen Itch.io and Steam scramble to appease payment providers like Visa as they suddenly took an interest in the kind of games available on the platforms, especially those which contravened rules and "standards" the payment providers apparently had. It led to Itch.io deindexing all NSFW content from its browse and search pages, and Steam introducing vague new rules about adult content, while removing a slew of games.

"In response to false claims and misinformation about our campaign, we're setting the record straight," wrote Collective Shout in a Facebook update. "Some have asked why we involved payment processors, and others have claimed we are responsible for Itch.io removing all NSFW content.

"We raised our objection to r*pe and incest games on Steam for months, and they ignored us for months. We approached payment processors because Steam did not respond to us.

"We called on Itch.io to remove rpe and incest games that we argued normalised violence and abuse of women. Itch.io made the decision to remove all NSFW content. Our objections were to content that involved sxualised violence and torture of women."

Collective Shout shared a timeline of the campaign on its website, noting how it began with No Mercy, a game which involves extreme sexual violence, being brought to its in March. The group's actions - a mixture of petitioning, emailing, and lobbying - began in early April and led to the game being removed from sale later that month.

top 95 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 207 points 1 year ago (1 child)

We need to ignore them, they're obfuscating from the real issue. Payment processors should not have the ability to police content, full stop, end of discussion.

The person who tattled is absolutely irrelevant and a distraction

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 142 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    Steam ignored them, presumably, because they sell their products in accordance with the law, and that's all that ought to matter.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    hot take: people ought to start forming morals outside of legal morality. a Lotta freaks are gonna end up illegal otherwise and the freak factor certainly includes some thing you do that your prudish neighbor doesn't like

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

    In this context it's definitely a hot take considering the prudish neighbor was able to make freaky shit "illegal" anyway, and in far greater capacity than any single government could. Rape and incest games ain't for me but when they get banned because a handful of people decide for the rest of us how the world is supposed to look like without anyone else getting a say in the matter I take serious offense. At least if they went the legal route the process would've a) been transparent and given an opportunity for others to make a case and b) not instantly affect the entire world.

    This "scary government is going to take away your rights" just leads to private enterprises taking away your rights without any oversight. This entire thing is a case in point. The government can take away your rights but at least you have a way to fight for your rights, what are you going to do against oligopolistic payment processors taking away your rights?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Rape and incest ain't for me but I take serious offense when they get banned

    phrasing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    i hate to inform you that these lobbying groups are acting exactly like a state would, actually. maybe don't lecture to trans people and tell us how the state works, we interact with the state way more than you will ever have to 💋

    what are you going to do against oligopolistic payment processors taking away your rights?

    idk, what are YOU gonna do? are cis people gonna finally fight for trans autonomy or are they gonna act like us having autonomy is too insane?

    are you gonna finally listen to us like when trans sex workers told you a decade ago that banks, the police and payment processors are policing our money or are you gonna let the issue fester because you don't want your family to know you stand with trannies and whores?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Okay, the smug "you're not one of us so don't speak" argument... Alright, then we're just not going to have a discussion. Just don't forget that if one of these groups ever use payment providers to suppress trans rights you supported this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    not surprising at all that you chose to go the blue MAGA "enjoy your camps, then" route instead of taking a step back. the only smug person here was you not realizing you're way out of your depth

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago*

    Do you know that you can edit your comment before you post? Because if you post and then edit the rest of comment in later others might miss that when replying? Anyway, not that you've actually addressed something in your previous comment I'm going to respond to that. I'm going to ignore what you've said right now because that shit is just too dumb to respond to.

    idk, what are YOU gonna do?

    I already complained to my government.

    are cis people gonna finally fight for trans autonomy or are they gonna act like us having autonomy is too insane?

    The fuck are you on about? I'm not against trans people. We should all have humane levels of rights.

    are you gonna finally listen to us like when trans sex workers told you a decade ago that banks, the police and payment processors are policing our money or are you gonna let the issue fester because you don't want your family to know you stand with trannies and whores?

    Again, the fuck? I'm also pro sex work because sex workers regularly get exploited and I think legalizing and regulation sex work would make their lives safer.

    Also do you see how insane you act? I disagree with you on one thing and then you automatically assume I also disagree with you on (probably) all the other things. You're turning me into a villain in your own mind, and for what purpose? So you could dehumanize me? You're acting exactly like the conservatives who hate your guts.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    'Blue MAGA'? Oh shit, please don't tell me you voted for trump!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    yeah, you got me. not liking liberals makes me a trump supporter. the overton window always ends at being a "progressive" slightly to the left of Ronald Reagan and anything beyond that is just the ice wall keeping us from finding out that the earth is flat

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 78 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    They are ok with murder and war simulation then? ROFL Smells like another religious pressure group tbh, haven't looked into them yet.

    They should go after all violence in games and media then; we'll see how well they can fend of the pressure... Not sure if they have the ressources to survive that, so I would LOVE to see them try.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    Oh it goes deeper than that.

    Check out their FAQ. They’re cool with the dehumanization of males too. They’re only advocating for “dehumanization” against females.

    A game about torturing women? Unacceptable.

    A game about torturing men? Acceptable 👍

    They mention some bullshit about how one happens more often and the other doesn’t so that justifies being hypocrites.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    By all accounts they aren't religious, we don't have *gestures broadly to American Evangelicalism* going on here in Aus. They just seem to be TERFs and SWERFs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    As they should have. Why should Steam or Itch.Io have to respond to every tiny cult of religious nutjibs making ridiculous requests?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    They didn't respond to religious nutjobs, maybe read the article

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    I'm not sure what you are saying here?

    Are you saying that Valve and Itch did not respond to Collective Shout? Well, so did I... My comment was saying they were justified in doing so.

    Are you saying Collective Shout are not religious nutjobs? That's an easy mistake to make because their website and branding does a really good job of trying to hide it from a casual researcher, but the founder Melissa Reist is pretty obviously a devout Catholic- she gives interviews with Catholic organizations, appears at Catholic youth camps, and describes herself as a "pro-life feminist", which is of course an oxymoron. She's definitely a religious nutjob.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Our objections were to content that involved sexualised violence and torture of women.

    Okay so why did m/m smut games get delisted? Get fucked, puritans.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    because MC and Visa are morons. According to them in porn 4 fingers and a thumb in a vagina is fine. as soon as you take said fingers and thumb, ball them into a fist, and then stick it in a vagina then they got problems with THAT and it's a no go.

    They have more stupid rules. If you piss on a woman in Europe and film it then it's fine. If you piss on a woman in the US and film it then it's not fine. IF you take the footage of someone pissing on a woman IN Europe and SELL it in the US then that's fine. But Americans are not allowed to pee on Americans on US soil according to Visa and Mastercard.

    here's another one: Incest Porn is not fine according to Visa and MC. "but I see that stuff all the time!" I hear you say dear reader. Yes, because according to MC/Visa you MUST establish that this is a step family relationship in the beginning BUT further into said video you can drop the "step-" moniker and start throwing around regular dads and moms and brothers and sisters all you like.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Why is their logo a pink asshole?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Next they are banning sex toy purchases, r rated movies, tabacco, vape and alcohol.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    next they’ll probably want to ban LGBT content since it’s “clearly pornographic”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Clearly you didn't read the article

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago

    or i share similar concerns with the person from the quote in the final part of the article…

    i’m not sure how bringing up something in the article makes it “clear” that i didn’t read said article

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    Have you gone to their (Collective Shout) website to check out their successful campaigns? They've taken down a manufacturer on Temu who makes silicon heads used for piercing. Apparently the heads looked too much like children.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    it's really wild that payment processors have decided to be the arbiter of content on the Internet.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    they've been doing it since the late 90s/early 00s. Visa and MC have a list of "rules" for porn companies and have had them for decades. Why the vast majority of adult entertainment companies use third party processors like CCBill to specifically deal with that shit.

    These dumb fucks in Australia think they're ahead of the curve or doing "something that has never been done before" but nah man they probably did talk to Visa and MC but highly doubt they pushed them to anything. it was more like Visa/MC said "oh yeah we did this before...yeah we should probably apply what we did to Porn to the gaming industry."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Australia is pretty weird about porn too. For years their rules basically ensured all female porn actors get boob jobs and took scissors to their labia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Never heard about this, what are you referring to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Thanks for taking the time to put those resources together for me.

    That's absolutely crazy, my goodness... Some people really are insane when it comes to sex. It reminds me a bit of how you can show soft penises in American TV to some extent without it being considered pornographic, but hard penises are pornographic. But this labia issue makes even less sense than that, because it doesn't depend on arousal. What a backwards situation

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Don’t forget ad companies! Those ad companies love a squeaky clean, family fun internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I also love squeaky clean, ad-less internet. In this timeline, sadly, I get to enjoy both, while only half of that would be enough for me.

    Blessed uBlock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    sounds like it's time to bring the 90s back. rotten.com here we go.

    they want to stop the sale and purchase of adult content, so just give it away for free. shareware that shit and spread it like VD.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 47 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Hey Australia, we've got enough stupid moral crusader nut jobs here in America; please stop making yours our problem too.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Don't forget Ruport Murdoch who's been pushing the right wing agenda across the country is an Australian export. This is not unusual from that country honestly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    He is from Australia originally, but he's been a US naturalised citizen and lived there full-time since 1985, he gave up Australian citizenship 40 years ago.

    No backsies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    How about we just send him half way back?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm expecting many services to accept alternative payment methods soon, just to beon the safe side from meddling ex-monopolies.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    So I appreciate the pushback, but for those of us with the option, what should we choose? Amex? Discover? Bitcoin is non-viable.

    I just want a solution, not another problem. I live in America, and we have WAY too many problems already.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Discover seems to be the best bet to me so far.

    Discover is on the JCB, UnionPay, Troy and RuPay. (japan, China, turkey, and India respectively). Probably many more.

    Similarly, a JCB card should work wherever Discover is. It's a billateral alliance.

    Oh, and all Discover cards work on Diners Club International because those two networks completely merged.

    Alliance members are not 100% acceptance. It seems like 95%+ acceptance though (most JCB will accept most Discover cards and vice versa, though you will get confused looks from the locals). It sounds like there's a lot of old equipment around the countries that break compatibility but cities and other urban areas with new equipment shouldn't have any problems.


    I'll probably get a Discover card and start testing this out. I already have Visa and Mastercard but this new censorship issue seems serious enough to make me start supporting a 3rd place competitor.

    Between Discover vs AmEx, it seems like AmEx is about elite club / customer service / returns etc. etc. nice features but I'm not sure if it's worth the price.

    Discover is free of annual fees, reasonable cash back, mediocre costs for the merchants (better than AmEx anyway and comparable vs Visa) and a surprisingly huge offering of international compatibility (RuPay, JCB, UnionPay, etc Etc). It seems like the winner to me as a 3rd card to experiment with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    People outside of USA don't even have Amex or Discover as options.

    It's either Visa, MC, or Bitcoin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    As a Canadian, American Express most certainly exists here. A quick google search shows that it exists in the UK as well. I'm going to guess it exists in other major countries as well.

    No idea about Discover though. Barely even knew it existed at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    Their logo is a butthole - is this some sort of elaborate troll??

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Someone down under needs to send some complaints about them in. There is no way anyone who projects that much isn't guilty of something.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    The only thing dumber than your comment is the amount of up votes you have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Thanks coming from someone with your post history it means a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Its not but that wasn't sarcasm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Oh its a lot of posts confirming what I suspected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Time to put some pressure on the pressure group.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Why are you censoring words?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    +1

    Self-censoring words like "sexualize" is part of the culture responsible for this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Kind of inevitable when automated moderation becomes the norm

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I was gonna say that's not necessary here, but actually many Lemmy servers do have a completely asinine word filter, and the devs have never heard of the Scunthorpe Problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Nitpick: I'd like to know what part of incest implies violence and abuse.

    Btw, does anyone know if Madmind Studios' games were delisted as well? Agony and Succubus would make the fuckwits of Collective Shout shit themselves

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    Leaving aside how gross it is, and separate from whether corporations should be the arbiters of morality:

    Incest between parent and child, even if the offspring is of legal age of consent, would imply an insurmountable power differential as well as likely grooming. Incest between siblings would depend on the age differential and authority structure of the family. It's not a case of incest=abuse, but of how likely it could imply abuse. The challenge is nuance. The goal is harm reduction

    I understand that for some incest porn is enjoyable, not because they would commit incest themselves, but because incest=forbidden=naughty=sexy. Maybe that's you? In any case, you asked how violence is implied, and that's my take

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›