Ain't no class solidarity like billionaire class solidarity.
post
I don't think Jensen is qualified for a job in Elon's boy's club. He only had sex with adult women.
Why are you so sure?
He's incredibly wealthy, runs a company supposedly important to everything, and was honey potted by a spy...
One of the main things honey pota do, is rack up blackmail. The goal is not just to get caught with the affair.
Depending on how long this was happening, she would have kept accumulating blackmail, including trying to get him to rape kids.
It's wild for people to assume if they didn't hear about shit it never happened in 2026.
That's just speculation without any evidence. I wasn't assuming anything but I'll stick to the available facts.
On Lemmy, this is somehow controversial ^
Wouldn't even surprise me if someone insulted you or claimed you're covering for pedophiles for simply being reasonable.
Buddy...
Assuming every billionaire who hasn't been caught raping kids has never raped a kid is just a wild position in 2026...
I'm not saying assume they all have, I'm saying none of them should be getting explicit benefits of doubt like you are.
He only had sex with adult women.
You stated it as fact, but as my dear friend Gin Rummy once said:
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
Making allegations in the absence of evidence shows that you have zero credibility, though, buddy.
I didn't make allegations...
You said he only had sex with adult women...
I said you don't know that, then you started trying to say I was saying he definitely raped kids.
How are you still confused here?
Only one person has definitively said they know if he's having sex with just adult women or not, and that was you:
He only had sex with adult women.
You made that claim, and all I've done is point out there is no way for you (or me) to know if that was true.
I even explicitly said this already:
I’m not saying assume they all have, I’m saying none of them should be getting explicit benefits of doubt like you are.
Like, I legitimately don't understand how you're still not understanding this. Why are you trying to say I'm the one acting like either of us know?
Are you even reading these comments?
I'm going to chalk this up to you have a bad day that you're putting this much energy into chasing down pedantry to this level and needing to score a win over socially understood semantics. You're usually better than this.
I hope your day gets better.
I appreciate seeing you handle this better than I did/normally do. I think this is an exemplary reaction to a situation like this.
I've found myself in their same situation before. You get so far down a rabbit hole of "being right" that the win in itself is meaningless to anyone. For me the need for the win had nothing to do with the conversation I was in, but instead a distraction from other difficult things going on in my life.
None of us are perfect. I'd like to think I'll never be in the same situation again myself, but I'm not vain enough to think I'm immune. I hope if it happens to me again others will remember my other better behavior and grant me the same grace.
He only had sex with adult women.
Pretty obvious the intended meaning was
"As far as we know, he only had sex with adult women."
It's perfectly reasonable to stick to known facts. That shouldn't invoke anger or be controversial. They never even said they didn't think he was capable of that crime. I think everyone on this platform except the like 50 conservatives would agree it would be unsurprising if a CEO was a pedophile.
Guess the chances that the following who were technically in the Epstein files raped kids, it can be a little time capsule:
- Trump
- Vance
- Hegseth
- Steve Bannon
- Bill Clinton
- Obama
- Soros
Yeah, cause Elon's definitely not trying to put himself in the spotlight by saying he'll do something he'll worm his way out of later.
Jenson should totally rest assured Elon will definitely commit to hiring him.
Musk would fire him again soon anyway. Compared with Musk doing artificial insemination with tens of women at the same time, Huang's traditional way is too inefficient.
And don't even get me started on having to use a spy.... When Musk wants to engage in treason he skips the middleman, picks up the phone and calls Putin directly.
He should make a legally binding offer to buy Nvidia and then try to weasel out of it.
Pink Slime says he would hire Stupid Jacket
“Then I’d at least have competition for the position of Most Embarrassing Executive at my companies.”
Of course he would. They could both have extramarital affairs with each other!
Wait, is Musk still on his 71st marriage? I can't keep track.
Anyway, he could give Huang tips on divorce! And starting again after divorce!
"Offer to buy her a horse. Uh, bitches love horses. Heh! And, uh ... mmm, uh, get some test tubes in bulk. !!! Lol. And, uh, make sure you subscribe to a, uh, mass mailout service for them! 100%! Heh heh! Just send those genes out at random to white bitches! Lol! Ha! Oh! And, uh, always remember to stretch your fingers beforehand. Cramp is no joke at our age. Starlink FTW! Vroom! Vroom! Self drive, brother! Lol! Uh ... lol! Wanna see my rocket?"
Oh Elon! Such a shocking thing to say! You are such an edgy guy. Sieg Heil!!
Ofc he would. He thinks Huang could hook him up with Chinese girls. Muskrat is that fucking stupid and pervy.
Chinese spies don't have issue with a surgically decimated penis. That's like Musk's ideal woman.
Yeah like when he was visiting Ghislane Maxwell for "kung fu lessons" in those emails found in the Epstein files. Maybe he thinks Huang knows Kung Fu
Can you overdose on ketamine? 🤞
Yep Elon wants to return a favor to him not in a good way he is super petty*
They've already had secrets stolen by fake lovers, it's what all the big shots do.
Elon's excited that he's finally able to hire someone who has prior experience selling state secrets. All that DOGE info was burning a hole in his wallet!
It's honestly impressive that Elon even has knees at this point. He's constantly on them.
As much as I dislike cheaters. At some point we need to look at the other person. She was a spy and used techniques of the trade to get him there. Whether or not he cheated isn’t really relevant to how he led that company. And what he built that company into.
sure but what about the second affair? at that point it's a pattern.
what he built that company into.
Tick sucking on an elephant be like "look how tall I made myself"
She was a spy
Yeah, that's the fucking point and why you don't hear about his non-spy affair...
Do people really think the reason this is everywhere is he cheated on his wife?!
What does this this even mean, he was an innocent bystander in his infidelity? It definitely does matter to how he leads the company. Which is evident by the fact he had an additional affair with a subordinate, which is strictly against company policy for obvious reasons. Chances are if you lack the morals to not fuck around on your wife of however many decades, ruining a marriage with 2 kids. You may be lacking other scruples. A decision process that leads to being able to be honeypotted by a spy.
Anyone with two brain cells to rub together can think “what are the consequences if this all goes south? If it gets revealed I cheated on my wife(twice).” The moment their relationship headed down bone alley he would have considered these things. If not, then he is clearly not capable of the decision making required for a company worth however many trillions.
So instead of an unfaithful dupe, we should really consider him as a ponzi scheme pushing, bubble inflating, fascist supporting, money hoarding, economy ruining, billionaire (derisively) cheater? Sure. Sounds good to me.
You ever heard the saying "you can't scam an honest man?"

all 67 comments