I’ve definitely had it on voyager on specific instance, the new feed will be fine and then I’ll come across a months old post and then it be back to the other hour old posts. In my case though it’s the same month old post each time. Sort by new sorts by post time I thought but could be wrong.

What does this this even mean, he was an innocent bystander in his infidelity? It definitely does matter to how he leads the company. Which is evident by the fact he had an additional affair with a subordinate, which is strictly against company policy for obvious reasons. Chances are if you lack the morals to not fuck around on your wife of however many decades, ruining a marriage with 2 kids. You may be lacking other scruples. A decision process that leads to being able to be honeypotted by a spy.

Anyone with two brain cells to rub together can think “what are the consequences if this all goes south? If it gets revealed I cheated on my wife(twice).” The moment their relationship headed down bone alley he would have considered these things. If not, then he is clearly not capable of the decision making required for a company worth however many trillions.

That sorta doesn’t really deal with the main problem here though imo. People who review and maintain the code have to review submissions. I doubt most of the idiots submitting slop pull requests are going to be upfront and say “hey before you spend your finite time alive putting effort into reviewing this, just know I put zero in but still want credit for ‘contributing’.” So they have to likely deal with a tsunami of this shit only to get part way through and realise it’s slop. The only solution would be to ban contributions or greatly complicate the process of it; which runs contrary to OSS. Torvalds stance certainly hasn’t helped and probably emboldened these types.

You filed complaints for what? What tickets did you purchase from trip?

Do you have a screenshot of the service agent telling you to do that? Because yeah, plenty of places online if you purchase things and then just do a chargeback will restrict your account. I think with PayPal you’re expected to work with the dispute resolution with them first before doing a chargeback. Never heard of them disputing a bank initiated charge back though, wild.

I was going to type as long as it’s rigidly defined, good fuck em but:

The Digital Duty of Care Bill aims to force online services, including social media platforms, search engines, apps, games, and AI chatbots, to ensure Australians enjoy a safe digital environment

Nah fuck right off. Define it rigidly with a specific scope and work outwards. There’s enough weasel tier censorship thanks to groups like collective shout without the government being able to determine which games, apps and search engines they decide provide a “safe digital environment”.

Great album, was very fortunate to see them this year on their Get to Heaven tour. Fantastic band and very talented lads.

Yep. Notice these as well.

Ok sweetie? My mum and dad came up in those sort of schools and told us about them, which is why they didn’t tolerate similar shit from my teachers. My mother went to a catholic school in the 60s-70s with nuns running classes. For those that know, that’s nuff said right there.

So they were pretty militant on the “we’re paying for our kids to be educated, not traumatised, abused or really anything else but that” stuff. Not that we didn’t have our share of shit teachers to deal with but at least they weren’t able to beat us with 1m rulers I guess.

I’d accept this for literally anyone that isn’t the guy spamming bordering nonsensical questions to these sort of communities with 0 intent of engaging. It’s his form of “making content” for these communities.

Guy literally posted about having 10k unread replies in what I assume was a shitpost highlighting this.

At school? Wtaf? My parents give me some at home as a “check this out” and so I could see the spots I was missing. My parents would have chewed the fuck out of a teacher if she heard they were making kids at school do it.

I really appreciate that response.

The man paying feels outdated. I’ll occasionally offer but usually whoever I’m dating declines and offer to split. I have been told this is also so they can avoid the guy then claiming he’s “owed something” for paying for the date. But yeah dates cost both people time and money and whenever I saw people stating the man pays on their bios/dating app I’d generally avoid them.