Fortnine actually made a video explaining how Google's ads are a scam.
In a nutshell, they don't convince people to buy things. They predict that someone is about to buy something, shows ads for it and then take credit for the purchase.
Fortnine actually made a video explaining how Google's ads are a scam.
In a nutshell, they don't convince people to buy things. They predict that someone is about to buy something, shows ads for it and then take credit for the purchase.
The actual truth is the people paying for ads are rubes.
When it came out that Facebook’s “pivot to video” numbers were all fake nobody batted an eye. Marketing departments have failed to apply any statistical rigour for decades and all fall prey to the the idea that if you target ads well enough they work.
If you even have a marketing department they exist to spend money, so as long as they have charts and graphs they’ll ignore the users and keep asking for budget.
Read a great article by a guy who was questioned as to why the company's advertising spend wasn't resulting in sales. He had the IT chops to dig in, found 77% of "clicks" were bots. He laid out his testing and results very nicely.
I am amazed that companies keep throwing money at internet advertising.
Yup. It's human storage in pointless jobs doing feckless shit to justify those jobs. They'll pump the numbers (and/or blame other teams on any flagging sales) in an endless cycle of bullshit. Marketing works strongest internally at most companies.
From what I remember, this pivot to video thing fucked a number of companies. Including cracked and college humor.
My dad asked me the other day if I had seen some commercial for something and I was like "I block ads on the net and don't watch regular TV. How would I have seen it?"
I'm happy to not be able to relate to someone wanting to talk about an ad. Especially if the focus of the conversation isn't on how annoying ads are. I get that they can sometimes be funny or clever or whatever but that just isn't a facet of humanity that I care to celebrate.
I had a teacher in middle school that told our class how he liked to watch the Super Bowl "for the ads." I thought that was silly then, and I still think that's silly now.
I know - companies throw money at the ads they'll air at that time, and I suppose some people consider the results to be acceptable entertainment. But to me, ads are still ads. Fuck 'em all, even the fancy, expensive ones.
It sucks to miss movie trailers. Its ironic, I subbed to a youtube channel to catch trailers, the only ads I wanted and it spammed shite edits of trailers and I gave up.
I don't even see the ads I see. If an email or text message looks like an ad then I'm probably not reading it either. Nonstop spam ads caused me to be this way. I sure as sh*t am never clicking on an ad to buy anything. I don't think I have ever clicked on an ad and bought something through the ad.
When did advertising become so evil? It's always been there, but today it's ridiculous. Even the targeted ads are useless.
Imagine if all these companies spending billions on vast networks of advertising actually used that money and energy on something, anything, useful. This meme is on point.
Like tracking and imprisoning dissidents? Because that's the usefulness we are going to get.
As you've said, it's always been this way. It's just the internet has supercharged their ability to serve them
Ever see Mad Men?
He’s not fully responsible by any means, but the impact Edward Bernays had on modern advertising and public relations is rather profound. It’s gotten more evil in the past couple decades, but it’s always been a force for coercion and manipulation.
You have to remember that the people in charge of advertising spend are c-suite executives, and c-suite executives are the absolutely dumbest rung of society. Invasive advertising makes them feel important, and nothing else in the world matters more than their feelings.
I do those Google survey things for Google Play money.
Google, the biggest spyware company ever to exist.
99/100 of the things it sends are "Have you been to any of these places recently", and none of them are even in my state.
I don't understand. You have my location. Why are you asking me about shit in Texas?
In the end I get a dime for my time and sometimes I spend it on some game.
look there's this HEB with a sushi bar, tortilla press, and a bakery twice the size of the largest house i've lived in.
have you been there? fresh tortillas = best tortillas.
Fresh corn tortillas are indeed very good
LOL, I don't even know what a HEB is.
Advertising is a perk
Control is the goal
I agree that that is the goal, but also think that the control was much tighter before the internet. When all the information was centrally broadcast and curated. Now they may create a more personalized control feed, but I can still go outside of the feed. Until that is closed too.
When your generation isn't advertised to anymore, it's a strange feeling. My uncle who is in the boomer range, they stopped advertising to them and he and my aunt really took it hard. Like I said, it's a weird thing to go through.
When they stopped advertising to my generation when I was early 20s, I watched them start trying again around the late 20s. I was kind of in the fuck you phase at that point.
My point is, if you're in a booming type generation, you probably don't know what it's like to have no advertising towards you anywhere. Some generations, no one cares what you think.
Note: Not a bad thing to be not advertised to, but it's a shock when it happens. You realize how much of it is out there.
Imagine if you and a friend entered a large, empty cafeteria, got your meal, sat down, and started eating. It would be so quiet your voices would echo. Then two more people come in and do the same thing. They start talking and it gets just a little bit more difficult to hear your conversation, so you and your friend start talking louder. Then more and more people come in start talking and the background noise gets louder than the foreground sound until you need to wear earplugs just to hear yourself chew.
That is the state of advertising. If only one player in a market advertised, they might derive some advantage but now people have to pay advertisers to scream the name of their product just because their competition does and no one can even hear the name of the product because everyone is screaming.
This, and coupled with the fact that businesses cross state and international lines. They’re not just competing with local businesses (which get drowned out in the noise created by the volume of money spent by big business) but they’re competing sometimes with national and international businesses. So 50 years ago you probably had to put up with mostly local stuff but maybe a national business like a car maker or airline, now it’s everyone that can do business where you live or might be.
If it ever comes to pass that I can't learn or figure out a way to block ads, I'll stop visiting sites that show ads. Obviously, that will severely limit my choices, but probably that's a good thing.
I play this single player mobile football game that has pop up ads. I just turn off the wifi when play instead of paying 5 bucks to remove ads.
Just use a DNS adblock?
Sometimes this is ineffective. If you use the youtube app, it has googles ip address built in. So even if you.use a pihole, you will still see youtube ads
This is true, but it I can't escape the fear that it is far more fragile than we realize. What happens when they start coming after adblockers harder?
More like precisely targeted ads of stuff I've already bought and don't care about anymore...
They've basically dismantled society so Amazon can think I'm some kind of toilet seat and/or chainsaw collector. Clown shit.
They wouldn't waste money on ads if they didn't work enough to at least break even on them. They work. People with adblockers or who do not click on ads are not the norm. Not that I like this, but here we are.
I'm no longer convinced by this line of reasoning. They wouldn't waste money on meetings if they didn't break even. They wouldn't waste money on physical offices if they didn't break even. They wouldn't use chat bots if they didn't break even.
What we have isn't an efficient rational market. It's just a bunch of superstitions from business school.
They just raise prices to compensate for the advertising budget. Sounds easy to justify when you make the assumption that reaching more people would generate more return. Perversely customers wind up paying more for the very thing that pays for the ads that get shoved in their faces.
Somewhere along the path from the boardroom to the consumer's eyes, advertising still works. If they stop advertising, they sell less, that's a metric they can measure and I'm sure they do, or at least have. Exactly how it works may be more art than science and not as well understood as they like to claim, but the numbers don't lie.
Actually, data suggests that over 50% of internet users are using some kind of adblockers. Looking at ads is absolutely “not the norm.” Using adblock software just makes one part of the largest consumer boycott in history.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
I don’t own a smart tv. I have no streaming services. I use Firefox with Ublock. I have an ad block on the one game app I play (Scrabble). If a podcast tries to play an ad I will drop everything to hard focus on the phone and hit the ff until it’s back. I don’t even have an Amazon sub. What do they hope to accomplish?
Granted, I’ve done some home maintenance for a relative and there’s zero effort there to avoid ads. Not even a mute as they play YouTube ads via their smartTV. So, maybe that’s everyone else.
So, maybe that’s everyone else.
Most people are pretty helpless. They just take what comes out of the box.
That is most everyone else.
You'd be surprised how few people go even slightly out of their way to avoid ADs.
... And it makes sense we're the minority, cause if we weren't I guarantee you the industry would be much more rabid in stopping us.
If a podcast tries to play an ad I will drop everything to hard focus on the phone and hit the ff until it’s back.
I decided to try getting into podcasts the other day. I started listening to one, hit an ad, and immediately shut it off.
Until I figure out how to get some kind of "SponsorBlock for podcasts" (I looked into it a little, but the solutions all seemed to involve a selfhosted middleman instead of something built directly into an app on my phone), no podcasts for me.
I don’t think it’s possible. Trevor Noah reads his own ads, how do you block that? Stewart, reads his own ads. Others, like Behind the Bastards, straight commercials. It’s pretty common.
For now, audiobooks are clean. The library is clean.
I don’t think it’s possible.
Do you know what SponsorBlock is? It's a thing that crowdsources identifying the embedded ads in Youtube videos and manually marking them to be skipped over.
The solutions I found are literally "SponsorBlock, but for podcasts" -- either by using Youtube Sponsorblock to remove the embedded ads from the Youtube copy of the podcast and then repackaging it in an RSS feed for your podcast app to download, or by forking SponsorBlock and running it against Spotify instead of Youtube.
| potential solution | why I rejected it |
|---|---|
| Pinchflat+Sponsorblock (https://lemmy.world/post/30510539) | requries a selfhosted service separate from the podcast app |
| https://github.com/ericmedina024/podcast-sponsor-block | requries a selfhosted service separate from the podcast app |
| https://spotsponsorblock.org/about/ | browser extension for use with spotify.com, not an app |
Basically, I'm holding out until I can get Sponsorblock integrated directly into AntennaPod (or some other podcast app available from F-Droid).
I’m guessing it’s a paid sub? I use ublock for free, on Mozilla, and that deals with YouTube.
"Paid sub?" What?
No, uBlock Origin and SponsorBlock are both browser extensions (and both free in terms of cost and freedom). uBlock blocks the ads that YouTube inserts into the stream as separate files. SponsorBlock blocks the ads that the Youtubers themselves embed into the video before uploading. Even if the Youtuber is reading out a sponsor message himself without so much as a jump cut, SponsorBlock can block it as long as somebody else who saw the video before you marked the start and end timestamps. (It also lets users categorize what kind of segment it is, so it can skip self-promotion, intros, "like, comment, subscribe", etc.)
all 68 comments