you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I'm no longer convinced by this line of reasoning. They wouldn't waste money on meetings if they didn't break even. They wouldn't waste money on physical offices if they didn't break even. They wouldn't use chat bots if they didn't break even.

What we have isn't an efficient rational market. It's just a bunch of superstitions from business school.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 5 hours ago

    They just raise prices to compensate for the advertising budget. Sounds easy to justify when you make the assumption that reaching more people would generate more return. Perversely customers wind up paying more for the very thing that pays for the ads that get shoved in their faces.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Somewhere along the path from the boardroom to the consumer's eyes, advertising still works. If they stop advertising, they sell less, that's a metric they can measure and I'm sure they do, or at least have. Exactly how it works may be more art than science and not as well understood as they like to claim, but the numbers don't lie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment