Can't wait, I'm hoping they release a flatpak at some point for all my immutable homies
post
Heroic works fine but I appreciate the gesture.
For me it's definitely more about legitimacy, recognition and signalling to the market.
This. I don't use GOG much, primarily because I'm lazy and just want all my games in the same place, but this is still fantastic news! It's one less barrier to ditching Windows as the defacto gaming os. It's also signaling to developers that the market share of users they cut off by explicitly excluding Linux (through kernel anti cheat or however else) is growing.
This isn't news for us already on Linux so much as it is yet another signal to Windows users that gaming on Linux is viable and worth investigating.
GOG and CDPR are closely related, so if nothing else, this means a high likelihood of launch day support for The Witcher 4 on Linux (or at least Proton), and THAT is a big deal.
Do cloud saves work yet? They haven't turned themselves on for me by default, so I'm guessing Heroic still considers the feature to be unreliable. That and proper achievement integration are my two most desired features for an official client.
They're never on by default, but you can turn them on for each game that supports it. I've never had trouble!
Well, I'll give it another look. Last time I tried was almost two years ago, and I kept manual backups in case the cloud sync failed; the cloud sync failed, and I haven't tried again since. It did come with a warning last time, so I figured if they were confident, it would be on by default.
Good! an official client! Hopefully it works with Steam Deck/Steam machine.
Just as long as I can still keep downloading standalone installers for both existing and future titles.
There are already a few games that REQUIRE galaxy to run, unfortunately.
Only for multiplayer, unless I missed something. It's their biggest glaring omission, but Galaxy is always optional or else their business model falls apart, and I understand that letting the platform take care of the multiplayer was an olive branch developers had been begging for.
See! I kept stating this! Nobody believed me.
To be fair, I've only seen it with the two more modern games I have on GOG and neither have multiplayer. All the actually old stuff doesn't need Galaxy for squat. If you're only using GOG for good old games, you may never have encountered it.
Which two? I buy modern games on GOG a lot these past two years.
EDIT: I think this might be a misunderstanding. If you go to your game library and try to download the game, "Download and Install Now" for GOG Galaxy is the first option, and the installer files may be collapsed by default. My understanding from looking through developer docs for GOG is that the DRM-free installer files are created for you automatically, so I don't know how you would make a game require Galaxy.
EDIT: I think this might be a misunderstanding. If you go to your game library and try to download the game, "Download and Install Now" for GOG Galaxy is the first option, and the installer files may be collapsed by default. My understanding from looking through developer docs for GOG is that the DRM-free installer files are created for you automatically, so I don't know how you would make a game require Galaxy.
No; when I try to launch the game from the .exe, it automatically opens Galaxy and only will run through Galaxy. If Galaxy isn't installed, it gives an error saying it needs to be launched through Galaxy. It does this for both Mad Max and Saints Row 4; both were originally installed from the off-line installers downloaded from the website.
I don't have Mad Max in my GOG library, but there are no complaints about DRM in the reviews or on its forums, and usually GOG folks will complain in one or both of those places whenever something's foul, including multiplayer (as they should). It's what got Hitman (2016) pulled from GOG, as while it's technically playable from the start of the story through to the end, it requires online connectivity for its most compelling features beyond that. As for Saints Row IV, I just installed it from the installer executables and launched it with my internet completely disconnected, so if that was a faux pas for that game at one point in time, it has since been corrected. It does require Epic Online Services for multiplayer even though previous versions of the game supported LAN, but I only have Re-Elected in my library. Others, I think, got Re-Elected added to their library if they had the legacy version.
Also, both of those games are stretching the definition of "modern" at over 10 years old.
But will it actually fix the numerous games that still ship with outdated dependencies without providing said dependencies?
Seeing as they have been caught using LLMs before I'm holding my enthusiasm. non-zero risk of a slopped client
I don’t game so I don’t have a dog in that fight, but the thumbnail for this article and the video associated with it appear to be slop generated.
An alternative client is Heroic, though they are currently discussing the use of AI in their project, but as of right now, I don't think they use it: https://github.com/Heroic-Games-Launcher/HeroicGamesLauncher/discussions/5556
Unfortunately, an AI code has already been merged. https://github.com/Heroic-Games-Launcher/HeroicGamesLauncher/pull/4882
It’s weird because in a way what I’d really want is a launcher like Heroic integrating Steam and GOG.
Gog Galaxy on Linux isn’t probably gonna change this..
Rights now I use Heroic for most of my games (GOG), but since I have a Steam Deck I’m launching the games through Steam.
I feel like everything relies on Valve and it’s willingness to allow other launchers, but what happens if they change their mind.
It would be good if Valve was part of the ecosystem and not the ecosystem.
Why would I ever want that when I can download games just fine through the browser? I don’t like running Steam either despite having a bunch of games in my library (I use shortcuts to launch them directly).
These programs are just bloatware that reduce my battery life.
I think you're missing the point. I don’t use GOG much at all, primarily because I’m lazy and just want all my games in the same place, but this is still fantastic news! It's about legitimizing Linux gaming at large. It’s signaling to developers that the market share of users they cut off by explicitly excluding Linux (through kernel anti cheat or however else) is growing, and it's signaling the public that Linux is a legitimate option. It's one more nail in the coffin of Windows as the defacto gaming OS.
I’m not too worried about Linux gaming. I think there’s already enough momentum behind it that it’ll keep growing steadily.
Look at the retro gaming hardware scene (handhelds) and it’s dominated by Linux at the low end and Android at the high end. Windows is a non factor.
Sure it’s important to signal Linux‘s viability for new AAA games or whatever, but I think that market mostly doesn’t care what platform they’re on. They just buy whatever hardware is most convenient for them to play GTA 6 or something.
I for one haven’t played a AAA game released in the last decade.
If you play GOG games that update, I can see a benefit to having a software that automatically manages the updates for your games.
Having an official GOG client might also mean that developers producing games on GOG are incentivised to make them work (either natively or with Proton), and we could also get some sort of "works well on Linux" tag on the GOG store (like there is on Steam!)
Because people other than you have other use cases and skill levels and wants and needs...
I don’t have a problem with it as long as it remains optional. So often though it feels like they’re trying to get enough people on the platform and then they can lock ‘em in and start enshittification, knowing they have people hostage to their game libraries.
That seems pretty remote for GOG since they’re all about no DRM, but their website has become more assertive about pushing Galaxy in recent years and that raises my anti- dark pattern hackles.
I use a desktop pc and it is power hungry even at idle so battery life isn't an issue to me.
I would like to manage my library without needing to fiddle with Wine prefixes (which for most 2000s games I have to) or Lutris.
Finally! That's one of the main things that have kept me from being a regular GOG customer, having its own Lutris and Wine prefix for it is so annoying. Steam has had it right for at least 8 years.
all 25 comments