Republican US Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky said Wednesday that Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth, the most prominent cheerleader and architect of the Trump administration's illegal war on Iran, will face an impeachment vote in the House of Representatives—unless he submits his resignation first.

"There is one contingency in which I won’t reintroduce the articles of impeachment: Hegseth resigns," Massie, who unveiled eight impeachment articles against the Pentagon secretary in September, wrote following Democrats' rout of the GOP in Tuesday's midterm elections. Massie is expected to force a vote on the articles—which accuse Hegseth of extrajudicial killings, waging wars without congressional authorization, and kidnapping a sovereign foreign leader—as soon as next week.

The Kentucky Republican's ultimatum came as CNN reported that a "knives-out campaign" against Hegseth intensified following the midterm elections, in which Democrats won control of the House and Senate beginning in January.

"Many Republican lawmakers and allies alarmed by Tuesday’s wipeout are moving swiftly to pin blame for the election results on Hegseth, arguing behind the scenes that he played a chief role in convincing Trump to attack Iran with no exit strategy—and no plan for managing the inevitable political fallout," CNN reported.

It's unclear whether Massie's impeachment articles have enough Republican support to pass in the lame-duck House, which is narrowly controlled by the GOP.

President Donald Trump, who launched the illegal war on Iran in February and has threatened to escalate the assault following the midterms, insisted Wednesday that he has "every intention to keep" Hegseth in his post. (Trump has previously defended top administration officials in public just before firing them.)

NBC News reported Wednesday that Trump "has told some of his allies in recent days that he’s considering replacing" Hegseth, who has gleefully boasted of the "death and destruction" that the US military has inflicted on Iran, where American bombs have killed thousands of people—including many children.

The looming impeachment effort comes amid rumors that Hegseth is eyeing the US Senate seat that Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) will vacate after winning Tennessee's gubernatorial election on Tuesday. Puck reported last month that Hegseth "has been angling" for Blackburn to appoint him to the seat once she takes office—a story that Hegseth denied through a spokesperson.

Democratic lawmakers and progressive advocacy organizations have expressed support for Hegseth's impeachment. Last week, as Common Dreams reported, Free Speech For People and two other national advocacy groups endorsed Massie's articles, calling them "a clear opportunity for Congress to hold Hegseth accountable for his dangerous abuses of power."

Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), the lone Iranian American Democrat in Congress, introduced her own articles of impeachment against Hegseth in April, accusing the Pentagon secretary of targeting civilians in Iran and other abuses.

"Impeach Pete Hegseth," Ansari wrote Wednesday in response to the Pentagon secretary's election-day social media post urging Americans to turn out to vote.


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5 points 2 days ago (1 child)

It might pass in the house, but unless the senate republicans are really looking for a fall guy, there is little chance for a conviction/removal until the new congress is sworn in and by that time Massie is out...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    A lot of Rs are aligning to say that the reason for the ass kicking in this election was the war. Massie is putting them on the record to either stick to that message and do something about it, or it's just all words and no action, or they'll pivot to a new excuse. If they don't vote to impeach kegsbreath then it will come back to haunt them at the next election in two years.

    "You knew that the war was illegal and immoral and unpopular, and you knew that it even likely caused the blue tsunami in '26, so why didn't you immediately take action to rectify this when Massie reintroduced articles of impeachment? All you had to do was vote to impeach and you refused. Why should your constituents trust you to do the right thing when you've proven that you'll double down on doing the wrong thing?"

  • source
  • parent
  • 74 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 157 points 1 day ago (21 children)

    Dude needs actual consequences, not an opportunity to walk away without any

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    I agree. Although those two outcomes (resignation and prosecution) aren't mutually exclusive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

    Arrest him as soon as he resigns. Send him to Guantoanamo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

    Trump will pardon him and I don't think we can bring state charges. He can't pardon impeachment, but the other things he can pardon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

    Add his name to The List.

    Not sure if someone is actively maintaining the top N people that need investigation and punishment, but...

    Vought, Carr, Hegseth, RFK jr, Miller, Bondi, Noem, Musk, Zuckerberg, anyone involved with ICE, all of donnie's family, and of course, donnie himself. But I'm sure I'm forgetting a lot of high-profile scum and there are of course many, many that are lesser known that need to be hauled into court.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Can we get a public execution out of it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Live streamed, like he wanted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago* (3 children)

    Life in prison. Livestreamed 24/7. Let all fascist traitors spend the rest of their days in the panopticon they want to enslave us under.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

    Will never happen in a country that has been committing war crimes since WWII. Rumsfeld did worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

    You don't know what Hesgeth did until after the investigation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 22 hours ago

    That girl's school did not bomb itself.

    leaked government group chat on Signal

    Military strikes in the Caribbean Sea and Iran

    The ouster and misconduct accusations against senior military officers (such as Lt. Gen. Brett Sylvia).

  • source
  • parent
  • Why offer a man accused of war crimes a choice of anything? Just fuck his shit up.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    OR - okay OR, hear me out here - Leavenworth.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    As someone who lives in Washington, I have a very different view of Leavenworth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    While Leavenworth, Washington is a nice little mountain town, Leavenworth, Kansas has something much worse, however it's more fitting for Kegsbreath.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

    I looked up Leavenworth, KS....and I have no idea what you're talking about....help a guy out?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Like, why? Why give him a choice? Why do they insist on no consequences?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 day ago

    Because consequences mean investigations and that would expose how the game is rigged and how every single one in politics, government and capitalist plays the system.

    This is a performance, not a correction.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

    Because there's no point impeaching someone who no longer occupies the position you're trying to impeach them from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    A better choice would be life in prison or capital punishment.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

    Fun Fact: You can still impeach him after he resigns.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

    And then execute him for treasonous acts in a kangaroo court.

    Learn the lessons of the civil war: kill every last one of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 22 hours ago

    This is not an either/or thing. Pressure him to resign and then impeach him anyway!

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 day ago

    Nah, don't give him the opportunity to resign.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

    Resignation is unacceptable. Hegseth should be tried and executed for warcrimes and treason.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

    So even as unpopular as Hegseth is, would they get 67 senator votes? Even in the new congress? I truly wonder.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 hours ago

    I think if the House presents their case for war crimes, which should be pretty trivial what with the extra-judicial boat strikes and the double-tapping on survivors and Iranian civilian infrastructure, there should be enough military-adjacent Republicans who can also read the mid-term tea leaves who would vote to convict and remove. Start picking apart the admin over the crimes and build it upwards against Krasnov.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

    Give him a pistol with one round a bottle of Jack.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

    Why would they let him off the hook?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 19 hours ago

    He'll choose impeachment. Oh, boy! The circus is coming to town!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 19 hours ago

    I got a third option right here in case he somehow refuses both the other ones.

  • source
  • Don't let him resign. Hold his nazi ass accountable for everything!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    Then coonvict him of murder in international waters

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 15 hours ago

    A case of what brand of EOH should we send him to drown his tears?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 hours ago

    Whatever he chooses, fingers crossed both options end with imprisonment

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago

    His only choice should be which direction his small boat goes in as he anticipates where the reciprocal projectile comes from…

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 15 hours ago

    Por que no los dos?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago

    as drunkenly rabid as he is, he wont go willingly

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago (2 children)

    Lol kidnapping a leader is hilarious. Do like a canadian leader or slavic leader next. For like a week. I’d giggle if our prime minister just went missing and the states were like yeahhh we’re ganna eventually fire the guy or maybe charge him for this.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago (1 child)

    They can hold onto Carney for a little while. I think he's done a decent enough job of convincing other countries to work with us. Maybe if he fucks off to the US for a while we can slow or reverse the environmental rollbacks he's been implementing while the dust is settling. Keep rail development going though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago*

    Commenting on my own comment, my first inclination was to say "keep the train rolling with rail" but realized that's confusing. Immediately after hitting post I thought of a better way to keep the pun and clarity.

  • source
  • parent
  • 10 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post
    [–] 6 points 8 hours ago

    How about prison?

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

    Do not give them a choice, hold thier feet to the fucking fire.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

    Your guilt has already been determined, this is merely a sentencing hearing. Now what will it be? Impeachment or resignation?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago* (3 children)

    For one, people in most government positions serve at the pleasure of the electorate and the president. Its not about whether hes done anything he could be convicted for criminally (though he has). It also about whether or not he is wanted out by the people at large.

    For two, the guy literally admitted in his election response video that his goal is to continue the extrajudicial murder of people trafficking drugs, which should have nothing to do with the military. He has admitted to, and admitted he plans to continue, committing undeniable war crimes. There is no question “if” he is guilty…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 hours ago (2 children)

    Its not about whether hes done anything he could be convicted for criminally (though he has).

    My pasta in Crisco, impeachment and removal is exactly about an elected or appointed official violating legal or ethical codes of conduct.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 36 minutes ago* (1 child)

    If the impeachment is over something criminal in nature, yeah. It can also just be about ethics, or even non-ethical shit. Clinton getting head was hypothetically impeachable, but not because it was criminal. Arguably it wasnt even unethical, other than him being married, assuming that she was qualified and performing her job otherwise. It was just a bad look

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 17 minutes ago

    Clinton's impeachment was for perjury after he testified that he did not have "sexual relations" with her. The Senate didn't convict because before he testified he asked the House committee to define terms and they defined "sexual relations" as intercourse, so under the definition they gave he did not lie about it.

  • source
  • parent