I emailed the foundation last night, replying to my original email from last week, and cited these links. Thanks for sending them.
Bro, you're the assholes that gave it to him in the first place. Very "we investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong" energy
Dude needs actual consequences, not an opportunity to walk away without any
An "emboldened" democratic party is like extra firm Jello
So what is your plan, to cancel your subscription and move everything elsewhere, then when they make a change, move everything back?
Already did. Here's what I wrote, feel free to use it for inspiration.
Hi Proton Foundation Team,
I’ve been a Proton customer since 2022 on the Unlimited plan and the free tier for some years before that. I’m writing because I really believe in your mission, people before profits, and I want to stay a customer. But I’m getting pretty worried about what’s going on internally, specifically regarding Andy Yen's leadership.
Recent reporting ([the 404 Media piece](https://www.404media.co/manifestos-fear-and-loser-thinking-inside-protons-ai-reckoning/ "the 404 Media piece")) describes a pretty toxic environment: employees being called "losers," tracking software to monitor AI usage, and pressure to use AI even when security teams have concerns. If the culture is punishing people for raising red flags, that feels like a huge risk for a privacy company.
Beyond the immediate morale issues, I’m concerned this atmosphere will repel top engineering and product management talent. The best security experts and PMs won’t stick around where they’re treated poorly or where their warnings are ignored. And if there’s a casual attitude toward essential safeguards like penetration testing just to move faster on AI, that’s a direct threat to the product’s integrity.
This is exactly why your oversight role exists. As the non-profit shareholder tasked with ensuring Proton never deviates from its mission, I need to know you’re stepping in. Can you clarify how you’re handling these concerns? Specifically:
* How is AI-generated code being reviewed for security if engineers are afraid to speak up?
* What’s the Foundation doing about the reported bullying and fear tactics?
* Are you monitoring how this culture affects talent retention and security rigor?
I’m not looking for a PR spin, just some transparency. I trust the mission, but I’m starting to doubt the execution.
Thanks for listening,
What recourse do we have other than switching to a competitor and waiting until someone over there does something I disagree with?
Because arrows and chess pieces work differently
Exporting chats allows you to store and review conversations outside the app.
The export includes all your chats; exporting individual conversations is currently not supported.
So how does this work? You have to export your entire, let's call it a, library? Every message to and from every contact. Then how do you read it, like literaly looking at a json with the {brackets: {and colons: and indentations}} and stuff?
If you're going to make up a number that no one will believe anyway, why stop at 60%?
Has anyone heard from him recently? Where has John Barron been?
“Every illegal vote cancels out the vote of a lawful American citizen,”
Not if they both vote for the same person