top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 71 points 1 week ago (8 children)

$385 for a 16 GB Pi seems crazy.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Cheapest 16GB DDR5 stick I could go buy from the local computer parts store here in Finland is currently 363€, or $406.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    Well, that's great, if the price is entirely made up by the Raspi foundation and not actually caused by the massively increased memory fab costs, it means the competition is going to release a much cheaper version any day now and steal the entire market from them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago*

    Well... per the linked comment's thread... they did... by replacing the ddr chips on raspi, and raspi just did the usual walled garden corpo dystopian lockdown. For a full product with a well known name like raspi I guess it will be some years...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Arduino has a 16GB DDR5 board designed to run local LLMs for $299. And it has 64GB of storage on board. Granted it’s not as flexible as a Pi, but it has DDR5 RAM, and a good bit of storage on board for cheaper.

    A 16GB Raspberry pi with DDR4 for $385 is just robbery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 45 points 1 week ago* (6 children)

    A raspi with 16gb of ram WTF!? why not just get a SFF PC instead at that point? Unless you specifically need portability or pin IO, I don't see the appeal of raspi anymore, especially at those prices (almost $400!!!)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    last time i bought one was pre-pandemic, not sure exactly how much i paid, but was under $50 new, to hear they are $400 now... i guess i go back under my rock

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    I bought several of them when they were 120. But yea at current rate, not really worth it. I will say it's nice running them off of PoE. Keeps my energy bill lower.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 78 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    16GB on a pi doesn't even make sense. It's super inefficient. That ramm would be much better off in a datacenter \s

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    Think of poor Sam Altman before you buy a 16GB Pi!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  • [–] 33 points 1 week ago
    [–] 149 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (36 children)

    The aim of those buying up all the RAM is to prevent people owning devices capable of serious computing, so we have to rent what we used to have back from them, with added censorship and surveillance. Sam Altman has been explicit about how he wants no one to own RAM except companies running data centres. The Raspberry Pi becoming unfeasibly expensive is just an example of that forced transition from owning to renting playing out. When it was introduced the Pi cost $15 $35. We're in a different world now.

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 101 points 1 week ago* (15 children)

    When it was introduced the Pi cost $15

    It was a 700MHz single core board with 512mb of ram...and it was $35, not $15

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

    And if tech had been proceeding since then as it did for the previous 30 years, you'd expect a whole lot more power for your $15 $35 now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    An ESP32-P4 is about the same ram, better IO options, but half the CPU of the original Pi for about $20 right now. So the tech has been progressing a little bit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    It's also been 14 years. "About the same ram...but half the CPU" for over half the price (original comment was wrong, it was $35, not $15) is not a flex. It's a stunning failure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    It was also $35 at release, not $15

    You're roughly getting 150x the power for 10x the cost with the current price hike.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    You're roughly getting 150x the power for 10x the cost with the current price hike.

    Maybe in a vacuum, but in a world with millions or even billions of 'legacy' devices sitting around collecting dust that have equal or better compute power for less cost, these devices don't really make sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Moore’s law ran for 40 years but hit a wall around 2010 due to physics.

    “Free” upgrades ended long before AI bros started buying up all the RAM and GPUs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 days ago

    It slowed around 2010 while Intel sat on its arse for quite a few years, but then transistors started shrinking again. This page has a chart suggesting the law has pretty much continued to hold. But we know that can't continue because things really are starting to hit physical limits now.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago

    They're going to run into speed bumps soon enough. Capital problems are starting to appear in the AI market over the past month, that's going to get a LOT worse. And no matter what, production in 5 years won't look like it does today. Between competition, newer production tech, and political upheaval, it's going to be a hell of a ride.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    To be fair I have heard this same pitch 4 different times since the 1980s and it hasn't come to pass. We users just get around things by being clever and resourceful. Trust me when the big AI bubble either pops or deflates - they will be right back selling ram and drives for cheap. Someone will for sure make an adapter for all the extra data center ram or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Yes but a pi zero 2w is $15 and is roughly equivalent to an OG B+. The problem as I see it is that computing segments like pis are jumping into the next segment up in power and in cost and nobody’s doing a very good job of marketing that or marketing the new product in the lower tier that are meant to actually replace them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago

    I remember reading scifi stories from the 60's and prior where they imagine giant UNIVAC-style computers that people connect to with dumb terminals, renting cpu time. And even in the ones focused on how awesome that future would be it sounced miserable to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -4 points 1 week ago (6 children)

    Not everything is a conspiracy launched by shady billionaires in smoky back rooms. This is straightforward.

    The AI companies are in competition so they're building AI DCs at a breakneck pace in hopes of being the one who crawls out the blast crater when the bubble pops. This building mania predictably sent shock waves through RAM and other tech supply chains.

    As to home compute, most people happily ditched their PCs a decade ago and do everything on their phone. I'm not sure tablets are popular anymore. Keep in mind, most consumers can't pronounce Raspberry Pi and sure don't want or need one. Ask the "man on the street" what he thinks of the RAM shortage and you'll get a blank stare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (4 children)

    What "conspiracy"? They openly have more ram than they can install even given the best possible build out. They have also openly stated that they are buying more than they need, to intentionally price-out the competition, and that they want everyone to rent compute from them instead of owning their own.

    Why would you paint this as a "conspiracy"? Are you just that ill informed, but chose to speak anyway? Or are you intentionally supporting it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    The person I replied to framed this as a conspiracy to make us all rent compute.

    If you think this is a play to capture the few remaining home compute users, you vastly overestimate the market. Reminds me of people on here thinking they're sticking it to M$ by turning to Linux. M$ don't give a shit, 90% of their profits are corporate Windows and Office.

    If it's a play to push corporate users into 100% cloud, good luck tech bros. Corporations are already holding onto their fleets longer, and they can wait till this bubble explodes. If you've ever tried to sell your boss on a subscription vs. outright purchase, you'll know what I mean.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 week ago* (2 children)

    The didn't "frame" anything. They are using the words out of the mouths of the people buying up the ram.

    And then "vastly overestimate the market"?

    You clearly have no idea what you're talking about in general.

    How much did the gaming industry alone take in last year? How about Microsoft's corporate revenue? How about something crazy like a defense contractor, Raytheon maybe?

    I'll wait.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Just phone games on iOS have basically double the revenue of the entire PC gaming market.

    It’s not as big as you think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 week ago

    BananaPI board I used to use for some projects has gone from about 120-150 to almost 400. It’s not just raspberry with this issue.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 1 week ago (7 children)

    Ummm can't you just buy a full size all-in-one motherboard for that? I mean, if you need small size sure, but I originally bought Pi's because they were cheap and small. Now they're just small.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

    Yep, and unless you really need the pi form factor just get a small n100 mini PC at this point. They are pretty much better in every way and are x86 so there's practically no limit to what you can run on them. I've seen n100 16gb mini PCs for as low as $60 on auction sites because some business will buy tons of them then sell them off for cheap when they upgrade.

    Want something faster? Look into business small PCs they are about the size of the small ps2 and will have Intel i3s to i7s. I'd just recommend looking for one that is at least the 8th gen Intel if you care about power efficiency. If using eBay search for used auctions and use a bid sniper that uses the official api

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Want something faster? Look into business small PCs they are about the size of the small ps2 and will have Intel i3s to i7s. I'd just recommend looking for one that is at least the 8th gen Intel if you care about power efficiency. If using eBay search for used auctions and use a bid sniper that uses the official api

    Are they still available? When I looked recently, most of it was Haswell/4th gen, and/or the seller had taken nearly all the parts out, like the memory, drives, and CPU.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    Yes there will still be big sell offs I recently got a 16GB n100 from someone selling a batch of around 100. You can set up eBay notifications for saved searches it is getting more competitive getting one for $60 is the absolute best case expect closer to $80+shipping.

    You can also check alibaba if you can spend bit more and have some older ddr4 laying around. They have n100 mini PCs with expendable storage and ram and multiple Ethernet ports. you can normally find them if you get the versions that don't come with any ddr4

    Edit: make sure it's listed as compatible with ddr4 not ddr5 there are a lot of ddr5 versions now

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 1 week ago (9 children)

    This is reminding me of hikes in property prices. Soon, older people are gonna say shit like

    • I paid that much for 32 megabytes 25 years ago
    • Why do you need so much RAM? Just use fewer programs
    • If you didn’t spend so much money on Steam and Netflix you’d be able to afford it
  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

    I started with computers in the cassette tape/5,25 floppy diskette era. RAM was measured in K's, not Megas, not Gigas. A flight simulator (white pixels on green background, yeah) fit in a diskette, 360 KB.

    Code was ultra efficient, as RAM was tiny.

    With time, and as RAM got proportionally cheaper, code got sloppy, because, hey, we got space.

    It's true that programs today are several orders of magnitude more capable, but it is also true that code now is hideously RAM inefficient and bloated.

    I'm not saying that the RAMcopalypse isn't real, I run a Ryzen 9 with 64Gb in my desktop, bought before the bubble, but as the Microsoft backpedal to 8 Gigs for W11, and the 8 Gig Macbook show, software should be rethought.

    AND RAM prices should go back to normal. That's the win-win

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    Going back to the 8-bit era muddies the water. Those computers and programs really were so limited. However, comparing what we were doing 20 years ago on 2 or 4GB of ram vs now and you see the sloppness of the software.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    You are expressing an illusion. The reason programs and operating systems use more ram is that they are doing more. If somebody stopped caring about resources it is web devs and Microsoft. Real-time and high end apps, like all games, have optimized frame time and the floppy era games is what looks sloppy in comparison. Except for sawyers insane games. Those are still somehow the cutting edge and a marvel of engineering to learn from 30 years later.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    It's true that programs today are several orders of magnitude more capable, but it is also true that code now is hideously RAM inefficient and bloated.

    The entire codebase of software in production, yes. But one thing that people might not realize is that some of our software algorithms themselves, at least for certain algorithm families, are also much more efficient than before.

    I thought this was an interesting overview:

    https://futuretech.mit.edu/publication/how-fast-do-algorithms-improve

    The focus isn't on memory usage, but the same general trend applies there: when someone discovered a new algorithm that improves on old ones, it can change the amount of memory used to accomplish a specific result.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    The price increase itself is more than I paid for a new Pi4B a few years back. Amazing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

    I feel like RPI lost the plot at some point. Like the entire point of them was a small minimal headless system that runs low end programs and scripts like a dns server or home automation system. I don't really see why something like that needs 16 gb of ram(or a nearly 400$ price point). At the new pricing, why would anyone want to go for a Pi vs just getting a low end pc which contains actual hardware meant for higher end systems.

    I guess form factor? I feel like you are just artificially restricting yourself going with the higher end pi's vs just biting the bullet and going with a normal system.

    Also I feel I should mention that this was also the same company that decided to link the ram to the firmware meaning you no longer can buy a pi and then solder a new ram on it. They claimed it was to prevent counterfeit sellers putting bad ram in it but, it still puts a bad taste in my mouth. The only way to bypass it is to go back to the 2024-9-23 firmware.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    The entire point of them was to be a cheap, open, educational computer for kids. Even the hobbyist/homelab use-case lost the plot, let alone the commercial bullshit they're targeting these days!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 child)

    honestly I would argue that is the same plot(or at least overlapping). Low end systems would be an entry level use case for sysadmin and network design. that's how I got started, I had an RPI that I used as a DNS, file backup and a chat bot I ran, learned a lot from the experience. But I can see how it could be taken into the commercial field as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    I'll admit that being a cheap way for adults to learn is plot-adjacent. But at its core, Raspberry Pi was intended to be the spiritual successor of stuff like the BBC Micro, Alan Kay's KiddieComp/Dynabook, and OLPC.

    (The shared purpose and British heritage of the BBC Micro is part of why the Raspberry Pi people picked ARM instead of x86, by the way.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 week ago

    Raspberry pi started as a weird educational side project of a Broadcom engineer, and that enabled them to work with a dirt cheap mass produced SoC for the first iterations. Without broadcom, there would be no raspberry pi. The problem is, it got wildly successful, and moved from side project to actual project that makes money, and education for poor kids wasn't as much of a priority anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 week ago

    16GB pie is like buying disposable silk toilet paper.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago (10 children)

    Honest question, what are people using their 16GB RPis for? What are you running that needs that much RAM?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 week ago*

    I got a rock-5-itx in the before times with a decadent 32GB of RAM. It's my home server, and it's currently using 19/31GB:

    The headroom is nice, I guess. Sometimes I spin up whole desktop dev environments I can access remotely.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago* (3 children)

    Two things I’ve found that really help having more ram for on the pi’s:

    • Any kind of docker image.
    • Build times if you use the pi as an agent/runner for gitlab-ce.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I guess that makes sense. Personally I don't see SBCs as very good Docker hosts or build machines. Aren't build times and such affected much more by the weak CPU? Obviously if the system starts swapping, then sure, having more RAM to avoid that helps a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    The following has been my own experience:

    On a pi, you’re much more likely to run out of memory than cpu compute. The increased memory gives you more concurrent things to run…images etc.

    Back when I got them and they were just north of a 100 bucks it made a lot of sense. Not so much with current prices.

    Having them tho, I really enjoy using them with poe. Their idle power draw is very low. Which is great for budget homelabs. But if I was looking for hardware today I’d look for used nucs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago

    Been on a NUC for years and if this thing finally shits the bed I'll be on eBay hunting another one. Neat thing with NUCs is you can pick your price point and get a unit from $<100-$3,000.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago

    For Halloween I used an orangepi (cause of cost, but would not recommend due to support) to install an LCD eye in a skeleton that tracks people using a object detection model. Additionally it's setup with some voice commands/interactions.

    Overall that means holding 3+ ML models in ram (yolo, whisper, Vad, etc.). That basically uses up all the RAM I have and before optimizations was actually causing the chip to overheat (was able to fix that, but still hits the cpu pretty hard).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    I installed SteamLink on it and use it to stream my gaming PC to my living room, which is too far away for an HDMI cord. I can get 1440p @ 120fps with no issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Surely simple streaming doesn't require much RAM at all. That was my point, for most people's use cases, the 4GB or 8GB variants should be more than enough.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 week ago

    I suppose it would be good for a large number of mostly idle services. Nextcloud, home assistant, a few other containers. Things that don't do much except for brief periods, but still need to be running. Add in a zfs or btrfs filesystem and some of those operations will use a lot of ram.

    I certainty wouldn't go that route, I've found that 2-4GB in an SBC more than meets the purposes I use them for. I also don't think I'm willing to run off a microsd anymore now that I've discovered emmc and ufs boards.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 week ago

    This RPi has more ram than my gaming pc lol

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago*

    I paid $99 for one on 10/25/25 from microcenter

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›