top 92 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 213 points 2 weeks ago (90 children)

My current company makes it real easy. All their simulated phishing addresses use the fictitious TLD of ".corn" so I just setup an email rule to filter them.

  • source
  • hideshow 90 child comments
  • [–] 161 points 2 weeks ago (32 children)

    I know this is a leap, but for some reason reading this made me want to buy a domain like virus.porn and make it the most wholesome, lemmy community on the planet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)
  • [–] 24 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    Or girlsof in stagam, which apparently has disappeared but used to be the story of the adventures of a person called Girlsof in the magical realm of Stagram.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    I remember that one too, but think it was actually called Slütsof In Stagrâm

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 weeks ago* (13 children)
  • [–] 42 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

    Just leaving their bare ass out there with no ssl, smh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

    It's only one ssl. How much could it possibly cost? 4 dollars?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

    I the worst part is deciding which flavor to get

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    I like that the most expensive one is called "wildcard".

    Sounds like it's gonna perform AMAZING feats of security some of the time and just not work at all at other times.

    Kinda like the wild mage of encryption 😁

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago

    WILDCARD SECURITY

    It blasts the hackers off the face of the earth with orbital lasers! killer robots sever their network connection! It's twirling a revolver on its finger while smoking three cigarettes!

    And sometimes, that revolver goes off in your face, and it posts your private key on 4Chan.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    Isn't TLS/SSL something at the server level and not the domain provider level?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    You have to get a certificate from a provider which can verify you control the domain.

    Once you've proved control you install the signed certificate with the secret private key on your server.

    You can get certificates for free via Let's Encrypt and a bunch more CA's. It hasn't been expensive for ages, unless you want fancy corporate support.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Corporate support can be a big deal.

    In a previous life, I routinely blocked anything from a free cloud host or cert provider. There was rarely a business justification for accessing a site or service hosted on DigitalOcean or signed by LetsEncrypt. Sure, get an SSL cert and host for your personal project - so I wasn't mad at the services - but it was a signal that the endpoint was not trustworthy beyond the TCP packets.

    I suspect that AWS/GCP/Azure has made that much harder.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    Be the change you want to see! I'll sign up straight away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    P1nkman, please report to the training room.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    But there's nothing here 😭

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    It can be yours for only $69/year!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    I wonder if the same leeches hoarding it also "own" plnkman.com...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Nobody owns it, virus.porn is currently unregistered. $69 is the actual price on Namecheap.

    plnkman.com (what you linked, with an L) is also available to buy

    p1nkman.com is an actual page registered through Porkbun.com since 2021. Maybe this is P1nkman@lemmy.world's domain, idk.

    pinkman.com however is owned by someone through DomainsByProxy.com via GoDaddy. It's been registered since 2004, and is just parked for ad revenue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 79 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (12 children)

    JBJTAc9nY83cYHV.png

    An actual email sent by my company. (not representative of their usual)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Yeah if anyone falls for this lock them out of their computer immediately.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 2 weeks ago*

    Clearly he's trying to trick you into pressing the "Report Phishing" button, which must be some sort of a trap. I'd check the attached document for further clues, especially since he's telling me not to. Must be something interesting there

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    That’s a crack it open with a hex editor, find who sent it, delete then return a note to the sender letting them know you’ve removed the problematic communication, thankyouverymuch.. signed ABiggerCuntThanYou@WhyIsMyCompanyWastingMoneyOnThisShit.org

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    That's how you get assigned to IT overflow tickets, NGL. 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    LOL! from the department of Don't Threaten Me With a Good Time!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    I'm betting that your current workload and their deadlines would be unaffected, is the rub.

    Don't get me wrong, I'm right there with ya! Except for the extra work, doubled expectations, and extreme discount to the co. 🙄🤢🤷🏼‍♂️

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    ...if you delete it, it'll sit in your inbox? I...what?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 weeks ago*

    in the Deleted Items folder. "Delete" just moves the email there. At my company anything older than a month in Deleted Items gets actually deleted. But more importantly if you just delete it, maybe nobody knows it's' there. If you report it the outlook team can delete it from the servers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 61 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

    A company I was in a few jobs back had several layers of IT department, there was the local studio department that handled our everyday stuff and a "head office" somewhere far away that set policy and handed out budget and whatnot.

    One day "head office" IT decided it was a good idea to send out some fake phishing emails to "test" us. They didn't tell the local IT department about it, I guess they were also being "tested". My manager received one and only recognized it as a phishing attempt after he'd clicked just one too many things for it to feel safe to ignore. So he yanked the power on his computer and contacted the local IT department, as is protocol when something potentially dangerous just happened.

    The local network went into lockdown while local IT tried to figure out if something actually dangerous had happened. It cost the studio as a whole several hours of work time, which for a studio our size translated to an obscene dollar cost. Nobody on our side of things did anything wrong, even that one extra "dangerous" click my manager did wasn't something he could be blamed for - head office had crafted the fake phishing attempt well and his reaction to it would have prevented damage had it been real.

    Head office never tried a stunt like that again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Given how common phishing attempts can be though, shutting down for every single one seems like overkill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago

    Phishing attempts that got far enough to actually show up in our internal corporate inboxes like that aren't common, though. They're normally blocked by the layers of firewalls and whatnot. We almost never saw email on those accounts from outside the organization itself, period.

    And once you've run something capable of remote execution on a machine that's inside the local network, with the sort of privileges that his machine had (he wasn't just a bureaucratic sort of manager, he was writing code too), you don't want to mess around.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 47 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    I've also never fallen for any of the phising emails the IT department sends to test me, my secret is almost never checking my email

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

    My company sends at least one fake phishing email a week. They track stats for them on a security page and I wear it as a badge of honor that my report says 100% viewed and 0% reported.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

    My company makes you take a course of you fail one or if you ignore 4 or 5 so I have the highest reporting record of the company just because of how much I hate that course

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    I think they do that at my company too but in addition to not reporting phishing emails I have a personal rule that I don't do any "mandatory" training unless someone in my management chain specifically asks me to. My boss probably gets annoyed by that occasionally but you'd be surprised how much of that stuff I never get asked about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Last year our CISO personally reached out to me and asked me to do the course that’s overdue. I was a little nervous for a second and decided to obey.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    Yeah that's a good call. I don't push back when asked directly I just pretend I didn't see the emails. Most of the time it's fine but the boring security stuff is usually the one they get me on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 2 weeks ago* (3 children)

    Kemming is 100 level preparedness.

    They need to up their game to cover internationalized homograph vulnerabilities, using roughly similar characters from different international alphabets to create totally different domain names:

    example.com
    exаmple.com

    They look identical but are entirely different.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    I do have a tendency to check where the link leads before clicking on it, so the difference between those two is quite obvious to me: http://example.com/ vs http://xn--exmple-4nf.com/, but a lot of people probably do not do that.

    I would definitely not click on the second one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago*

    They look identical but are entirely different.

    They "a"s don't look identical at all with a good font like Atkinson Hyperlegible Next, which also very clearly differentiates between

    • 0 and O
    • I and l

    etc..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 weeks ago

    My company is using phishing simulations from a company that puts their company name in the x headers or every email, so that's also easy filter.

    As a bonus, that filter also throws all the full security training courses to junk

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    lucky you. they fail us if we don't right click report phishing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    I have over 8000 unread mails in my inbox. Whoever contacts me used Slack. I don’t give a fuck about emails unless DMs me “hey can you maybe answer that customer mail I forwarded you?”

    So I would have a fabulous time with such a stupid policy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    My place has this thing where most phishing test emails are obvious but every once in a while they’ll drop a really good one, sometimes these even pose as our managers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

    Mine includes a header so their mail filter knows to ignore it.

    At this point, I'm pretty sure that every employee who has been there for more than a month has written or at least copied a filter to delete any email with that header.

    I've never been comfortable with that kind of mass deletion and we have, AFAIK, unlimited mailbox storage, so I just set my version to mark those emails as read.

    edit: Mail, not mark.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

    If your company contracts with phish.me then that URL is actually in the email header metadata.

    Just set up a rule for the word phish to a special folder, and then you can use the "report" button on everything in that folder to get the credit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

    KnowBe4 includes a bunch of headers in the email, including a disclosure saying they have permission to run the simulated phishing test.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 weeks ago

    I heard a rumour that KnowBe4 have ties to Scientology.

    From what some Googling told me, Kevin Mitnick is a scientologist, as is most of the upper management .

    Not really relevant here, just interesting...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    Apparently I'm both right and wrong.

    At a previous job, there was a header. I can't remember it directly, but lets say it was like this:

    X-Acme-Security-Test: Authorized simulated phishing exercise conducted by KnowBe4 on behalf of Acme Corp for security awareness training and compliance validation
    

    Apparently KnowBe4 lets customers set their own custom headers. So this was probably set by my company. And not something everyone will see.

    But also, they set an X-PHISHTEST header. Maybe its a signed header, so they can cryptographically prove the test was in accordance with the customer's request (this email was sent by us, but it uses YOUR private key, so clearly you were involved here, and we arent just scamming people, or otherwise allows you to validate it at the firewall/spam filter). This isn't the header I remember, but apparentlly can also be used to detect them -- the explicitly say not to do that, but here we are.

    But if you ever get a knowbe4 phishing test, check the email headers. you'll probably find something to key off of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    Also there's a "congratulations you're a good boy" popup when you click the report phishing button in outlook, so I guess those headers is how the plugin determines whether this is a test email.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    Where might I find more details to set up filters?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 child)

    In the gmail web client, I dont see an option to filter off headers. thunderbird lets you set up filters for custom headers, but it's a bit more complicated.

    TBH, i never used it to set up a custom filter, I just knew there were indicators I could use to figure out if an email was in fact a test

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    My work computer is quite locked down (can't even install Solitaire or Minesweeper), so I'll have to set up whatever filter in Outlook. And I think it deletes the messages once flagged as phishing, so I don't think I have one to inspect right now.

    Anyway, some random blog seems to point back to KnowBe4's whitelisting guide, so I think the filter would need to look for something in the header or for the specified IP addresses?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

    If we don't report the emails as phishing it is considered a fail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    When they first started doing these tests unannounced, our IT department got a horrendous failure rate and then management had to announce that if we recognize it as a phishing simulation, we should still report it, and we also shouldn't start poking around in the supposed phishing links. 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 weeks ago

    I just take it one step farther and never open any email. If it's important you will CC my manager and he will physically come by my office and tell me about the email, giving me multi-factor phishing protection. If he demands I open an email then I am absolved of responsibility.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 77 points 2 weeks ago

    My knee jerk reaction is to calmly explain why this isn't appropriate in a corporate environment.

    I'm so broken.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›