top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 126 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

How little vetting must have gone into the decision? Dubious claims of being an attorney aside, if they had done any sort of mock press conference her complete lack of public speaking ability should have been evident.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 117 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    But she looks like Ivanka? That's all the qualies she needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    I don’t want to stick up for Ivanka since she is a garbage person but Katie looks like Temu Ivanka. Or like if you were going to make a porn that’s thinly veiled Ivanka fanfic. I’m not even a fashion girlie but that girl looks kind of a mess. Like she just rolled out of bed, smeared on some brows without her glasses and stumbled up to the podium. Don’t get me wrong, their insides will always be the ugliest insides ever, but those outsides are no prize. I’ve legit seen junkies on the onramp who looked more put together.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    I think it comes from the conservative mindset that someone competent and capable in one field will be similarly competent and capable in other fields

    Simply put: They believe in a hierarchy. Some people are imherently better at everything than others

    She was competent and capable in her previous role of being an ass kisser. Because she was able to butter Trump up, it was assumed she would be good at any role, and she had "the look" Trump wanted (she looked like his daughter)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    It's just "is she hot", that's all they care about. Also, their idea of hot is terrifying.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    If you wm has skills for this job (or maybe you already do) would you be willing to apply of the last person quit because the president used her as decoy when there was a real threat.

    I think only dumb people would still be interested. Looks like they had to wait to even find her.

  • source
  • parent
  • In a sane world after all the "fallout" from finding out they did zero vetting with a lot of iSSe goons you'd think they'd start doing a tad better for higher profile positions.

    But then again in a sane world iSSe wouldn't exist and this orange kid diddler would be fucking locked up in jail

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 109 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    Oh man, she only lasted half a mooch.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Idk, 5 business days seems like a full working mooch?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 58 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    A mooch is 11 regular days so she's really not even a full half mooch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 183 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    The lettuce is still grocery store fresh

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 66 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Imagine if a Democrat administration had this scandal. Imagine Biden hiring this woman.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago

    It's like the "only democrats have agency" thing. We as a society don't seem to hold republicans to any sort of standard. They're like a fire that burns or a plague that spreads. You can't expect a fire to be polite.

    Except they're not an elemental force of nature. They're people. People with names and addresses and free will. They should be held accountable.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 101 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Who the hell dresses like a flight attendant for their first Whitehouse press appearance? (Besides her)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    Off to start her own podcast grift now I'm sure.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

    got my crypto wallet ready for the totally-not-a-rug-pull Zacharia coin thats bound to show up in the coming weeks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 29 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    I wonder if any of Trump's supporters remember that his original 2016 campaign leant heavily on the idea that he was great at hiring people, and would replace the swamp with a team of the country's best and most highly qualified people?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    Supporting Trump was always about making MAGA feel good about themselves, feels not reals. Trump's actual policy outcomes almost never mattered.

    Perhaps the main policy point of Trump was anti foreign adventure, alongside being anti-immigration and anti-inflation. And now Trump has started an optional war in Iran which is arguably even stupider than Bush II's Iraq War. Which has caused inflation to sky-rocket. And the national debt is spiraling out of control. And yet, 76% of Republicans still approve of Trump. I don't think most people realize how literally insane the loyalty of the Republican voter base is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    The % is a little misleading though. The total # of people who self- identify as Republican has also been shrinking (true with people who self-identify as democratic too). More and more people self-identify as independent. Most of the data I have looked at stop at 2023-2025 though, so who knows what it'd look like today after the fiasco this administration has been in 2026.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago*

    Republicans are still projected to get something like 40-50% of the votes next election. Given how much the Republican party is the party of Trump, pretty much every vote for a Republican is a vote for Trump. All the Republicans who opposed Trump have already been primaried out at this point.

    What actual policies does the Republican party even stand for, at this point? "No new wars"? Economic responsibility? Preserving freedom and democracy? Small government? Real Christian values like helping the poor? Preserving the status quo? Free market capitalism? No, they stand for Trump and racism, and nothing else.

    So while you can (rightfully) quibble about the specific % I mentioned being misleading, the underlying Trump support is huge.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    5 days, isn't that only half a mooch?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Three days. She didn't work Monday, and she was fired this morning, so I don't think she worked today.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 3 weeks ago* (5 children)

    Its crazy she thought she could get away with lying about her degrees in a job thats so high profile. From far away she does look a bit like Ivanka, who trump has said he wants to have sex with, so I imagine thats why she was hired.

    https://newrepublic.com/post/173968/donald-trump-fantasized-sex-ivanka-new-book-says

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Between the way he talks about Ivanka, the way he interacts with her in public, and those creepy-as-fuck pictures of the two of them together, it was already obvious to anyone with half a brain that he desperately wants to bone her

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    I think he already did. The beginning part of this video of Ivanka giving a tour of her bedroom makes me feel gross. It's like the minute she turns to her bed all the air is sucked out of her.

    https://youtu.be/R6FZ5kj3FGo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    USA outstupids itself daily.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 69 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 65 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
  • [–] 29 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

    I'm getting to where I think a full Steven Cheung denial is the best possible endorsement of truth available. His tears of indignant rage just seem to light the last candle on the cake of whatever exposé is going around this time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    I bet the Turnip administration is really upset about the person whose job it is to communicate with the press was really distracting and ineffective. Now they'll have to waste more time looking for another with just a few short weeks until midterms. I bet they really hate that their pick is a relative nobody and convenient scapegoat. They probably really wanted to field questions about inflation, or oil prices, or food prices, or investments into Russia, or intentionally hamstringing Ukraine, or the Epstein files, or any of the insane things Turnip has said at recent rallies about his own health, or the superficial qualities of his supporters, or the bang up job RFK is doing with measles, or their targeting of political rivals, or their waivering support in traditionally rock solid strong holds, or that list of ballroom doners WP just released. Yup, I bet they're really embarrassed. We should keep focusing on the card we picked, surely the magician wont use misdirection.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    In all fairness, if you know going to be asked tough questions, you want a propagandist that can gaslight on the spot, not a slackjaw going "DURRRRRRRRR, me laaaawwwwwyerrrrrrr HURRRRRR"

    Ah well, valuing loyalty > competence strikes again, shocking nobody. I might actually watch SNL this weekend, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    They underestimated how hard it is to find someone like Leavitt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

    job interveiw kweschuns:

    • Are you hot?
    • Are you loyal to the One True God Donald J Trump?
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago

    The lettuce lasted longer the she did.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Something tells me this is the longest she has held a job down.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    Given Trumps history, its possible she was doing a lot of "jobs" for Trump when she was much younger.

    I wonder how right wing tabloids plan to spin this, as they were talking about her like she was a golden goddess

    And seriously maybe Trump get distracted too by their breasts, which is why he doesn't notice that everything coming out of these people's mouths is unbelievable crap (including his own).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

    Outlived, and out cultured, by a bowl of warm, raw milk.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    And as such, and US Americans, there to for, and as such.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I personally believe, that, US americans are unable to do so because some people out there in our nation don't have the answer and I believe that our education like such as South Africa, and the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and I believe that they should our education over here in the US should help the US, it should help South Africa, and should help the Iraq and the Asian countries, so we will be able to build up our future for our children.

    Amen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Natalie Harp was having NONE of it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    So what happened this week that this whole palaver pushed out of the news cycle?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

    This week the Washington Post released an exposé of the donors to the ballroom fund. You know, the one Trump swore would be used to pay for the new ballroom project that he would help fund himself. The one that never abided by actual donation laws but remains controlled by a PAC that steers the cash into a private account belonging to Trump, all with zero transparency or oversight. The one that has taken in over $350 million in unnamed donations so far. That one.

    Absent from the list is Trump himself, who has said that he is helping to pay for the project.

    Later in the article:

    But the documents show that the vast majority of the funds raised came from companies and wealthy individuals with interests before the federal government.

    Companies or executives of firms that have had contracts with the federal government during Trump’s second term accounted for about half of the total, The Post found.

    It's well worth reading for the donor list alone, but those are the highlights. This is the c/Politics discussion: it contains both the original WaPo link (paywalled) and free options to read the content.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    in short :

    President Trump’s new press secretary, Katie Zacharia, was fired Friday, after less than a week on the job, according to three people familiar with the matter.
    Ms. Zacharia had gotten off to a bumpy start with her first and final press briefing on Tuesday, in which :
    1- she largely read off a script and
    2- (she) ended questioning after just three queries (were addressed to her).

    That was followed by an onslaught of headlines about whether she had misrepresented herself as a lawyer — the president called her “an attorney” — despite failing her bar exam.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/16/us/politics/katie-zacharia-fired-press-secretary.html

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    28 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    14 comments in c/fauxmoi@sh.itjust.works view that post
    9 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    1 comment in c/politics@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post