all 70 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 93 points 3 weeks ago* (13 children)

I was also flabbergasted when I observed this. No idea why this is not default, but you can configure "Fail downloads" = "Executables", "Potentially dangerous" in the Sonarr Indexer options to prevent these downloads. Enable advanced settings first.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    I think this isnt a thing with prowlarr, is it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    It is, I've seen it. People upload .exe files pretending to be an episode day before it's release. Prowlarr will find those and start downloading.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Also frustrating that sonarr won't allow you to NOT auto search for an episode before it's released. It auto downloads WAY more garbage than early releases in my experience. In fact I'm not sure I've seen it actually download something successfully before it's official release.

    But searches online show sonarr devs pushing back against it for some unknown reason.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Are people running the arr stack in windows?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I actually saw this last night while I was looking for another setting. Why would I ever want sonarr to download an executable, and why would they think I'd want it that way by default? It made me wonder if I was missing something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 51 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

    The author getting pissed every step of the way is really funny, great write-up!

    I blacklist just about anything executable from downloading in Qbit but it stills feels a little clunky, I wish the ARRs would inspect the torrents and immediately ignore the .exe ones before they even hit Qbit, I feel like it should be a default option to help the Newbies out.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 48 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I remember spotting this when the Mario Galaxy film came out. The top seed was a 2GB exe.

    I hope we come full circle and we get "Avril Lavine - Girlfriend.mp3.exe"

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Settings -> Indexers -> Pick one -> Fail Downloads -> Select "Executables" and "Potentially dangerous"

    You still have to remove the malware from your torrent client, but at least sonarr will give up importing it and try a different torrent.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I know that qBit has an "excluded file name" option so just add *.exe to it.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago*

    Yeah they had this enabled without knowing it

    qBittorrent marked it "finished" two seconds after adding it with total_downloaded: 0, so nothing actually landed on disk. No idea why. Don't care. Thanks qBit.

    Think .exe is the default value but you can add more

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago

    Cool to see someone pull this kind of malware apart. Interesting read.

  • source
  • The problem is your roommate, your parent, or 3am you double clicking it in the downloads folder. (do NOT execute execute the skid malware)>

    Yeah, like any of those scrubs has access to any folders of any importance.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    I've been hit by this a few times recently too. No ill effects other than needing to clear it from the queue thankfully.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    I have been using cleanuparr to automate this. I have exes blocked in the download client and then cleanuparr sees they aren't being downloaded and removes them and triggers another search.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

    This shit is why I never used the arr stack. Never automate incoming data. It fetches what I intend it to fetch.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 weeks ago

    Shit like this is why I’m done with public trackers.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    What torrent sites are affected?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 weeks ago* (12 children)

    I don't know why you are annoyed by this.

    You use an automatic tool. It's bound to fail or make a mistake once in a while.

    The "uploader" likely knew this, so they had some fun. It's not like what you are doing is legal or anything. "Le me go complain on my blog about someone messing with how I do my illegal activites".

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago

    I don't know why you are annoyed by this.

    I don't read it as annoyance. It's a rundown of them tracking down who is doing it and what it actually is. They're just flagging for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    This seems like a one off for them, but for me whenever tracking ongoing TV series I would regularly get malicious files as they appear before the real ones, and get found and downloaded by sonarr.

    These days I only automate from private trackers, and enable a public tracker for an interactive search only if something can't be found on the private trackers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    The private trackers, I am looking at going back to te high seas but the cost of some of the trackers and usenet sites are high, then a debrid and I am kijd kf back where I was.

    Are there dcent free private trackers?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Most good trackers can be used completely free of charge. But you have to work your way up to them, proving yourself as worthy on a lower tier tracker.

    There are plenty of guides on this. Most recommend starting with an open interview on RED or MAM, then using the invite forums once you qualify.

    You can also watch for open sign-ups. TL opens its doors a few times per year (and usually during December), and it's at least as good as the public trackers. Sometimes these have invite forums, but usually not. TL does not.

    You will, however, want to spend money on a VPN with port forwarding. This should run ~$30/year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    I have been using seedpool for a while after the othrr tracker i used shutdown. I like them mostly because i dont need to worry about ratio. As long as you seed everything you download you're good.

    Edit: it's apparently not allow to give invites to people who ask

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    My problem is that it's hard to stay in good standing with private trackers while using the *arr suite. I leave everything seeded for weeks, but I never get close to 1.00 ratio on any of the files. It's not a connectivity issue AFAICT because I do have SOME people connected and downloading from me, but by the time the torrent reaches that point where there's hundreds/thousands of seeders, I'm still running at a big deficit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    Oh on private trackers it's hard to keep a genuine ratio like that. Instead they typically assign points for time you spend seeding, and you use those points to "buy" upload credit that counts for your ratio.

    Many private trackers have a requirement to log in every X months so occasionally I just go log in to each and spend all the points.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago

    As annoying as this is, I agree. It's a case of automate better or add a confirmation layer to the download decision.

    The reason I don't auto-DL anything yet is cos I'm too lazy to spend hours making sure it's setup correctly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 weeks ago

    It's reasonable to be annoyed by this.

    I've built automatic tools within client software that handle file types and basic security better than this, < 5 years into my career as an inexperienced dev.

    It's crazy that not only is executable downloading not blocked by default for a media downloader, but as fast as I can tell it's not even doing magic bytes based format detection...?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

    Imagine trusting Torrents when Usenet is right there.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

    Imagine paying for pirated content, when high quality torrents are right there

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Torrents are pretty terrible without private trackers. Since majority of free sites have no access to an API and require prowlarr/jacket to create one, a cloudflare slover to bypass bot protections and even then it's janky.

    If you use private trackers, you now have to keep seeding downloads to keep your ratio healthy, and require additional trickery to allow files to be seeded after sorting by sonarr.

    Usenet is plug and play, as the indexes are built with this functionality in mind and it's far less likely to run into malicious uploads, as there is curation occuring on the paid indexes, ie, they are insentivised to make the paying customer happy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    I have been using private trackers for 15 years now and have been extremely happy with them. I dont mind seeding back, plus not all of them have the ratio requirement. My tv show site knows it would be very hard to keep that from slipping so instead of ratio its just a certain length for episodes and season grabs. I really dont care about keeping my bittorrent app running since i leave my pc on anyway. As for sonarr it just copies the file to the new directory and renames it, after a few months ill do a cleanup that takes 2 min.

    As for usenet, my coworker loves it but he definitely says it has issues which may or may not be an issue today or workarounds for it? He has said the takedown requests are so fast now that finding a lot of stuff that releases quickly can be difficult if you dont use sonarr or radarr to grab right away. Every now and then he has to ask me to find stuff.

    The only real issues ive ever had is the instability where sometimes theres outages and not much you can do. I remember last year or maybe year before that one of the biggest had a 2 month outage and things looked bleak.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    I disagree. I have some private trackers, but I never use 'em anymore, mostly due to ratio requirements. I just don't have the space on my local drive to hold and seed all those files forever. Spending a bit of time on your initial *arr configs, means everything just works, even using all public trackers. I can't remember the last time my system grabbed a wrong/bad file. Been dialed in for years at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    Hold on, even if you're using torrents, you still have to pay for a decent indexer right? Or has stuff changed in the last few years?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    1000004726

    I've been at this since Napster was a thing, so imagine my surprise to hear that folks are paying to pirate.

    Usenet I get, but private trackers? only real benefit would be a risk reduction of being caught by your ISP, but that's easily overcome by using a VPN.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    VPN and public trackers gets you more shows and films than any human could ever consume. I'm not sure why any other method exists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    The two main benefits I've seen of private trackers are that you avoid the issue in the OP which happens all the time on public trackers, and that shows download in seconds.

    Not sure how helpful they would be if things weren't automated. I just have things set up so my Jellyfin users can request shows and they get downloaded automatically.

    But with that said, "private" doesn't mean it costs money, just that it requires an account (and usually that is an application process). It means they can kick people off for uploading things they shouldn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    No, most public ones are fine. Always have been. I've never used a private tracker and have had very few issues. Especially after using Radarr, etc. to pick out good and bad torrents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    Search lists in qbit are how most people manage.

    I personally use torrentleech which is a private tracker but has basically everything and super permissive rules. Very very easy to maintain ratio and to also get invited and started. I have 4.8TB of upload credit. Searching in qbittorrent or manually across public sites took too long for me when i usually want to find a higher res or higher bitrate version of something. I also always saturate my download speed even with only a few seeds since they're almost always seedboxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    Uh no, most if not all of the paid indexers are not worth it compared to just waiting for an open invite from a quality one.

    Not even the gold tier quality ones allow paid entry AFAIK. They only allow people who are long time seeders and uploaders with reputation.

    The one thing you might have to pay for is a VPN in case you want to torrent on public indexers, which is often worth it because not everything will end up on private indexers, and you usually have to wait a couple of months before you can join a solid private indexer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 weeks ago

    I've been getting exe's and such since I've been using the tech for a decade or more, though it does seem to be more common lately. I only wish sonarr would have an option to automatically blacklist and search. But at least now it does have an option to fail the download before even attempting to import it.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago

    Rargb included a .exe which if you changed to .txt was just a message saying don't reupload. It was to prevent indexers or something with basic "don't download .exe" rules. So that is probably why it is not fail by default in Sonarr for everyone? I don't know for sure but it is something.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub view that post
    [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    the 886 MB of random junk isn't there because scanners give up after a certain file size, it's there so the quality profiles in sonarr pick it up as a legit episode

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    It grabs stiky notes because a lot of people save passwords on sticky notes

  • source