I clearly mean that the more people (both sellers and buyers) do this crap, the worse it becomes.
Lazy people who want to avoid studying in college have been being taken advantage of since the beginning of academia. Adding AI doesn't change anything, humanity's knowledge has survived lazy students and fake notes it can survive fabricated notes.
...making people study on potential AI slop which will compound over the years and that will result in a degradation of the humans’ knowledge on the topic
Someone really needs to stop your friend before they destroy the sum total of human knowledge with their beer hustle.
They're paying for Google too, but they're using the credit card of their students' privacy.
It might turn out we were better off without electricity, but we'll never know because we have electricity.
We need to work out a better review system, the current one of writing our complaints on cuneiform tablets and burying them under a desert for dozens of centuries isn't working out.
He can't keep getting away with this
It's also getting to the point where some nerd with a lot of DDR5 can vibe code a complete replacement emulator from scratch in a few days on hardware running in their basement.
I get to use it 5% of the time (e: for $20/mo)
I can't believe that selling services that nobody needs at prices nobody can afford while also taking a loss on selling said service isn't a successful business model.
Oh no, my life savings (2 sticks of DDR5) will decrease in value.
It's the process of making art that's what's important and fulfilling, not the end product.
Unless, of course, I don't approve of your process in which case you're a talentless hack.
Pretty much sums up the argument.
One one hand, I'm glad Steam isn't abusing their market position and treats customers well.
On the other hand, why are our rules and laws setup such that it is impossible to compete with a company which has a de-facto monopoly on a service.
