top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 107 points 1 month ago* (28 children)

Probably didn't because (among, I'm sure, other reasons) the SNES was such a major upgrade over the NES that it would've drawn a negative comparison between the lesser difference of the Switch 2 versus the Switch. Younger audiences wouldn't get it/wouldn't care, and older audiences would see it as pandering/unwarranted.

Could also be that audiences were still wary of the whole Wii/Wii U debacle and just wanted reassurance that it'd be "more of the same but better".

And lastly, if they wanted a "Switch 3" in the future, it's been shown by Xbox that funny naming schemes can go awry after the second iteration.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 1 month ago (18 children)

    What you don’t want a switch 64?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 1 month ago (9 children)
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (8 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago (7 children)
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (6 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Just realized that was for 64 bit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    At the time, most home computers were still 16-bit.

    The N64 released in 1996. Mac System 7 released in 1991 with 32-bit support. It took until Windows 95 for the first consumer 32-bit version of Windows.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Why not go big and make it a Switch 128?

    I understand that there's a diminishing return and that a 128-bit processor core doesn't really add much in the way of performance over 64-bit, but it would be like having a V8 under the hood with an obscene amount of horsepower that you never use, no? People drive those anyway.

    Or be the true innovators again and release a ternary gaming system 🤯 They could call it the Nintendo3 (pronounced "Nintendo Base Three"), the Nintendo Trit, or the Nintendo ThreeWay

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    128-bit addressing would add memory and processing overhead that would make it not worth it. 64-bit addressing is already more memory than will ever be in a Nintendo console (16 exabytes, or 16 million TBi).

    The Nintendo Swirch 2 also has a 128-bit memory bus, which means it can move up to 128 bits of memory at once. This does make memory operations faster, effective increasing the bandwidth of memory operations.

    The PS5 has a memory bus width of 256 bits. The Xbox Series S has 128 bits, and the Series X has 320 bit memory bus width. So, wide buses aren’t uncommon on modern architectures.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    IMHO, Nintendo slaps “Super” on everything. At this point it’s basically a generic brand element that they use to make things Nintendo-ish.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Mediocre Mario doesn’t have the same kind of ring to it… actually, I take that back. We were robbed!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It's Nintendo. They could've called it something ridiculous like GIMP and everybody and their mom, kids, and dog would line up like

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 month ago* (2 children)
  • [+] 28 points 1 month ago (6 children)
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    featuring dante from devil may cry

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    So much silliness in this thread, I love it.

    To be the wet blanket, no, Nintendo did the right thing because they learned their lesson from Wii U, and to a lesser extent from the New 3DS

    It's not about the players, it's about who buys it, and the ones who buy it are parents and adults who aren't always up to date on gaming news.

    PS2, PS3, PS4, PS5. That makes sense, you want the latest one? Buy the bigger number.

    Wii U? I already have a Wii at the house, the kids don't even use it. It's a tablet? They already have a tablet though.

    New 3DS? I already got a DS and they tricked me into the 3DS! I don't even need the 3D feature, that was a waste of money. It's still pretty new, I don't need another new one.

    I worked at GameStop all those releases and I can't emphasize just HOW MAY TIMES I had those conversations with customers. Not just parents either, but casual consumers.

    Xbox was confusing too eventually.

    Nobody got confused on Playstation.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Xbox started looking at 14yo's gamer tags and thought that was a good naming convention:

    "XboxoneX"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I'm still not over the fact that not ONE person at Microsoft said "Really? We're calling it the XBone?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Why do you assume that them using the name meant no one noticed? There's a non-zero chance the person who came up with the name was trolling the company and deliberately set that up. Stranger things have happened, like the phalluses on the Little Mermaid poster art.

    There's also a chance that some marketing people came up with it, higher ups liked it, then didn't appreciate anyone pointing out the name they like had a potentially embarrassing abbreviation and would respond negatively to that. Or maybe they already had a culture of people pointing out things like that getting flak for it and anyone who noticed just stayed quiet. Hell, I could easily see that kind of culture being established when people objected to all the actual deliberate anti-features MS has been adding over the years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    No, it should have been The Switcheroo

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    I'm still bummed they didn't call the N64 any of the following:

    Ultra Nintendo

    Turbo Nintendo

    Super Duper Nintendo

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    It was originally called the Nintendo Ultra 64:

    I think they changed it late in development because they realized there was no “next” name and everyone would have exaggerated any issues with the GameCube being like “Nintendo couldn’t top the Ultra I guess!”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Nintendo when naming their next console:

    Yamauchi: "Hey Shigeru, what should we name our next console?"

    Miyamoto: "No idea. Anyway, I was thinking about going to the aquarium, you wanna join?"

    Yamauchi: "Perfect! We'll call it the Dolphin!"

    Miyamoto: "...What?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    I mean they could have just stopped after the Ultra 64. The GameCube was alright but there was no point in continuing to invest in Nintendo consoles after that unless you're just a casual gamer.

    I mean the Wii was just an overclocked GameCube with motion controls. The WiiU was just a Wii with a slightly better (yet still outdated) GPU and a worse controller. The Switch 2 is literally just a Switch, again the only difference being that it uses slightly less ancient hardware.

    Nintendo gave up completely in innovating after the 90s. Now all they know how to do is cater to the mainstream and sue their most hardcore fans in the name of profit. I'm tired of their Late Stage Capitalism bullshit!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    Quite the interesting take that they "stopped innovating". Sure their hardware specs have always been lack luster, but Satoru Iwata always focused on fun over bleeding edge. After the Wii, PlayStation and Microsoft followed suite with the PS4 "wand" and Xbox Kinect. After the Switch released, Sony created the PS Portal, not to mention the Steam Deck and other copy cats. They have literally been the top innovators of the last few generations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    PSP was way before the switch, but otherwise I fully agree.

    ETA: but I guess that was copying GBA so. Nevermind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    Nintendo gave up completely in innovating after the 90s.

    Very weird take, especially after mentioning:

    I mean the Wii was just an overclocked GameCube with motion controls.

    PlayStation 3 was just a more powerful PlayStation 2. Xbox 360 was just a more powerful Xbox. Then there is Nintendo who, instead of making a more powerful Gamecube, they went with largely the same hardware but with a radically different control scheme.

    Isn't that the definition of trying to innovate?

    Also, the Switch format has everything now. I don't see how anything can innovate further than to radically change what a videogame even is.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago*

    The Nintendo Router

    Fun side note, I've had more than one fun conversation where someone forgets to say "Nintendo" when asking about connecting a switch to my network (especially back when it was a new thing...)

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Should’ve called the Switch Lite the Switch Pocket, and the Switch 2 the Switch Advance

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Can’t wait for the New Switch 3DS XL

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Let's just do the whole DS lineup.

    Nintendo Switch
    Nintendo Switch Lite
    Nintendo Switchi
    Nintendo Switchi XL
    Nintendo 3Switch
    Nintendo 3Switch XL
    Nintendo 2Switch
    New Nintendo 3Switch
    New Nintendo 3Switch XL
    New Nintendo 2Switch XL

    Yes, very sane.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Super Switch Fighter II Turbo

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They should have named the joy-cons the super drift controller too

    Although, considering that all of the joy-cons all seem to eventually fail, the "con" part of the name was certainly appropriate

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    or the switch U

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Oh, that would have been sweet. Then the next Switch would be Switch 64. :D

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    I thought this for a while as well. Until it became blatantly obvious how much of a "Wii U" moment that would be. Not as bad, but nowhere near as concise and obvious as Switch 2.

    It would also be the Nintendo Super Nintendo Switch. Or the Nintendo Super Switch. And that last one doesn't sound good to me personally.

    Switch 2 makes the most sense when you really dive in to it.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Why not just the Super Nintendo Switch? No need to lead it off with the redundant 'Nintendo'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Because the company is named Nintendo, not Super Nintendo.

    The SNES was the Nintendo Super Nintendo Entertainment System.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    They should have made two spin off consoles, The Nintendo Top and the Nintendo Bottom. That way they have a complete set.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Super Nintendo Switch U cube.

    Nah, people understand numbers.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Switch Ultra 64

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Switch too electric bugaloo.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Should have been called the Bait and Switch, because of the physical media situation.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    May as well call it “Switch 2 Linux Gaming PCs” based on their actions pushing us all that direction anyway. Their legal team especially can get fucked. Not that Nintendo is any better or worse than Sony or Microsoft.

    The good part is that we don’t need their stupid consoles because most games are available for PC and the few exclusives that aren’t will be available to emulate at some point.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Go full 80s.

    Switch Turbo: Radical Edition

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Then there's MS over here ruining decades of easily understood versioning and thinking that was a Good Move™.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›