congrats, now that is an unpopular opinion. caramel is so awesome, it has its own verb
post
It's an incorrect opinion, not liking caramel is fine but caramelization is chemically completely distinct from burning. That's like saying you only like sushi because cooked fish is just burnt fish
Massively faulty premise. The point isn't to burn sugars but to heat them slowly so as to bring about (wait for it) caramelization.
Quite aside from producing sweets, this is one of the most critical chemical reactions in cooking(β ), used in any number of popular, classic dishes.
EDIT: (β ) and arguably even in human evolution, believe it or not.
Upvote that your whole premise sucks. π
Quite aside from producing sweets, this is one of the most critical chemical reactions in cooking(β ), used in any number of popular, classic dishes.
I would disagree and say it's the Maillard reaction which is similar but different from caramelization.
Upvote for a truly unpopular opinion!
Also, your description of caramel is incorrect, caramel is caramelized sugar. But that doesn't effect you not liking it!
I wholeheartedly disagree but congrats for having an actual unpopular opinion.
Butter, cream, salt are all a huge part of the flavor too. Also, its a Maillard reaction, not oxidation. So, not only is your opinion unpopular, it is also objectively false.
Butter, cream, salt, and sugar are already in the vast majority of desserts. You do not need more of this! Onions should be caramelized, sugar should not be. This is my unpopular opinion. Someone like you disagrees. We get it
Mmmhh but akshully, when you caramelize onions, you're technically caramelizing the natural sugars in the onion βοΈπ€
Wow looks you paid attention in year 8. Good job
You need to wear that unpopular opinion cape proudly, not be defensive. Although, it kind of makes it more fun for us, so carry on.
Yeah what this guy said. It's okay not to like caramel, I'm not gonna force it down their throat or mock them for their tastes. But omg what's with the abrasive attitude!
It's not that they are disagreeing with your opinion, so much as they are correctly pointing out that caramel is not burnt sugar. It's like saying that a cake is burnt flour. It's wrong and stupid.
Yep. This is unpopular.
Bourbon, banana, maple, caramel, vanilla... they all dance around a midpoint flavor of the gods.
Maple, Banana, and Vanilla are all natural flavors I enjoy. Bourbon is an American creation I don't care for and caramel is burnt sugar. Those things do not belong in the same group.
I have noticed lately that commercially available caramel doesn't taste like caramel anymore, it just tastes sweet
If you burn the sugar, it most assuredly is not caramel. It's also not usually just melted sugar but a mixture of melted sugar, salt, butter, and heavy cream.
It can also be burnt milk fat, such as Dulce Leches.
I don't like caramel desserts, but this is just culinarily incorrect. It's not burnt sugar, it's sugar that's undergone a millard reaction. This is how many many foods are also prepared, and what makes them delicious.
Carmel isn't burnt sugar any more than a seared steak is burnt meat.
Truly unpopular.
Caramel, especially salted caramel is really good.
Same opinion for butterscotch or nah?
Thats not just unpopular, thats a verified trash take. Take my upvote and leave earth
Homemade toffee is one of the most delicious substances on the planet.
Goat milk caramel, oooooh so delicious.
Yes soft caramel is sticky but the flavor is amazing. Magically changed by heat from just butter and sugar and cream to caramel.
Any cookie with butter and sugar has a similar toasted sugar flavor. It's a foundational flavor in cooking.
Thank you for you absolutely trash opinion on this delicious food. Perfection.
Definitely unpopular by any metric!
I'll add to the list of folks explaining that the way you describe caramel isn't accurate, as there is a difference between burnt sugar and caramel.
I'll also add my own bit of opinion that not all caramel is equal. When made on the cheap, particularly in commercial sized batches, it's way less likely to be anything other than why you say you don't like it: sticky and unpleasant. Shitty caramel is most often not even caramel, it's a flavored and thickened syrup, which will have only scant flavor beyond being cloying.
You probably wouldn't like good caramel either though, So I won't waste your time or mine explaining how to make it. But suffice it to say that if it's homemade, you have much better control of the results, and thus a better chance of it being good.
What about a caramel sauce, like on Ice cream? It's sticky like any other syrup, but not in the way that gets stuck in teeth. Curious if it's also the flavour or mostly the texture.
All kinds? They range in consistence.
It literally isn't just burnt sugar... That is like calling anything cooked "just burnt". Also, caramel usually has butter and cream in as well, so it's even worse than that. "I hate cake, it's literally just burnt flour".
You're a loon and your opinion is hot garbage.
Is this like the cilantro thing? I'm fascinated.
If you ever get the chance, find a Mexican candy/sauce called "Leche Quemada", it's the best caramel analog I've ever had.
Iβd say 90% of caramel is gross, you being correct or not about it being burnt sugar is irrelevant to the fact most caramel is gross. Flavored soft cream caramel can be good though. Salted caramel is disgusting, itβs the worst type of caramel to me by far.
This is the correct opinion, so am I supposed to downvote?
Caramel tastes like shit, has awful consistency, and it gets stuck in my teeth. I hate caramel.
Serious question. When you have a steak, or any piece of meat really, do you try to make sure it doesn't get an color when it cooks? A lot of what's happening is the same (heat converting sugars and things into other compounds that our brains like)
Iβm not OP but I donβt like a seared steak, I donβt like char, if it wasnβt for micro plastics a sous vide steak would be my preference if I ate red meat
This is a misconception. The Maillard reaction is distinct from caramelization. The two processes occur at different temperatures and involve different inputs. Caramelization can occur with sugars alone, whereas the Maillard reaction requires amino acids (such as from proteins).
TIL! So (in general) it goes maillard reaction -> caramelization -> pyrolysis as temperatures increase?
Yes. Maillard reaction occurs between 140C and 165C, accelerating as the temperature rises. Caramelization occurs above 170C.
Since there isnβt that much of a temperature difference between these stages, and because something with the very complex chemistry, shape, and structure of food is difficult to heat evenly, in real cooking youβll get Maillard browning and caramelization happening at the same time in different parts of the food. You can of course increase the amount of caramelization by using a sugar-based marinade or sauce, and this is why barbecue sauce is so popular!
all 71 comments